Literature DB >> 16904428

Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Sam S Chang1, Michael S Cookson.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16904428     DOI： 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN： 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Postoperative biochemical recurrence of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Authors:  Ji Eun Heo; Jee Soo Park; Jong Soo Lee; Jongchan Kim; Won Sik Jang; Nam Hoon Cho; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  A multi-institutional comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy, radical perineal prostatectomy, and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eric E Coronato; Justin D Harmon; Phillip C Ginsberg; Richard C Harkaway; Kulwant Singh; Leonard Braitman; Bruce B Sloane; Jamison S Jaffe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-10-01

3.  Cancer Care Ontario Guidelines for radical prostatectomy: striving for continuous quality improvement in community practice.

Authors:  Todd M Webster; Christopher Newell; John F Amrhein; Ken J Newell
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Cristiano Cristini; Magnus Von Heland; Stefano Salciccia; Vincenzo Gentile
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Adverse prognostic impact of capsular incision at radical prostatectomy for Japanese men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masafumi Kumano; Hideaki Miyake; Mototsugu Muramaki; Toshifumi Kurahashi; Atsushi Takenaka; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Frej Filén; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Disease-specific outcomes of radical prostatectomies in Northern Norway; a case for the impact of perineural infiltration and postoperative PSA-doubling time.

Authors:  Sigve Andersen; Elin Richardsen; Yngve Nordby; Nora Ness; Oystein Størkersen; Khalid Al-Shibli; Tom Donnem; Helena Bertilsson; Lill-Tove Busund; Anders Angelsen; Roy M Bremnes
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: a case report and narrative review.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Michael Pinkawa
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2012-12-17

9.  Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 immunoexpression in prostate carcinoma at the positive margin of radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Romano Oguić; Vladimir Mozetič; Eleonora Cini Tešar; Dora Fučkar Čupić; Elvira Mustać; Gordana Dorđević
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2014-07-06

10.  Transition from open to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with a reduction of positive surgical margins amongst private-practice-based urologists.

Authors:  Ralph Madeb; Dragan Golijanin; Joy Knopf; Craig Nicholson; Stuart Cramer; Frederick Tonetti; Kelly Piccone; John R Valvo; Louis Eichel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2007-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.