Literature DB >> 16902176

Carotid artery stenting: first consensus document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee.

Alberto Cremonesi1, Carlo Setacci, Angelo Bignamini, Leonardo Bolognese, Francesco Briganti, Germano Di Sciascio, Domenico Inzitari, Gaetano Lanza, Luciano Lupattelli, Salvatore Mangiafico, Carlo Pratesi, Bernard Reimers, Stefano Ricci, Gianmarco de Donato, Ugo Ugolotti, Augusto Zaninelli, Gian Franco Gensini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The prevention of stroke and the correct treatment of carotid artery stenosis represent today a major debate in cardiovascular medicine. Beside carotid endarterectomy, carotid angioplasty and stenting is becoming more widely performed for the treatment of severe carotid obstructive disease, and is now accepted as a less invasive technique that may provide an alternative for selected patients, particularly those with significant comorbidities. An Italian multidisciplinary task force, in which converged the most representative scientific societies involved in carotid treatment, was created to provide neurologists, radiologist, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, and all those involved in prevention and treatment of carotid disease with a simple, clear and updated evidence-based consensus document. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: This First Consensus Document of the ICCS (Italian Consensus Carotid Stenting)/SPREAD group addressed the main issues related to methodology, definition of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, indication and procedures for carotid artery stenting, including the use of devices for preventing procedural embolic complications. Special attention was paid to credentials and competency for physicians qualifications to perform vascular angioplasty and stent placement, including training, acceptable complication rates and certification.
CONCLUSIONS: As any guideline or consensus statement, also this document is valid as long as the evidence on which it is based remains up-to-date. In such a fast-evolving field of medicine as the management of carotid stenosis, it is mandatory to stimulate a continuous and fruitful discussion among all the professionals involved in this very evolutionary field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16902176     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236101.09480.b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  11 in total

1.  The role of endovascular expertise in carotid artery stenting: results from the ALKK-CAS-Registry in 5,535 patients.

Authors:  Stephan Staubach; Ralph Hein-Rothweiler; Matthias Hochadel; Manuela Segerer; Ralf Zahn; Jens Jung; Gotthard Riess; Hubert Seggewiss; Andre Schneider; Thomas Fürste; Christian Gottkehaskamp; Harald Mudra
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Usefulness of acceleration time for internal carotid artery origin stenosis.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tamura; Yasuhisa Akaiwa; Kiyoshi Onda
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2013-07-31

3.  [Current guidelines on carotid artery stenting. Critical evaluation].

Authors:  R Hein-Rothweiler; H Mudra
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and surgically high-risk patients: single-centre, single-operator results.

Authors:  Josef Veselka; Petra Zimolová; Daniela Cerná; Pavel Stanka; Aleš Tomek; Martin Srámek
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2008

5.  Acceleration time ratio for the assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Hidehiro Takekawa; Keisuke Suzuki; Etsuo Takada; Hideaki Tanaka; Ryuta Okabe; Masanari Yamamoto; Yuko Ishii; Madoka Okamura; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 6.  Indications for carotid artery surgery and stent: the role of carotid ultrasound.

Authors:  Yong Jae Kim; Charles H Tegeler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Short- and long-term outcome after carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: single-center experience within a prospective registry.

Authors:  Christoph H Spes; Andreas Schwende; Florian Beier; Martin Hug; Ralph Hein; Henning Strohm; Wolfgang Büchele; Mathias C Haufe; Harald Mudra
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Age and gender disparities in the risk of carotid revascularization procedures.

Authors:  Sotirios Giannopoulos; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Spyros N Vasdekis; Efstathios Boviatsis; Konstantinos Iota Voumvourakis; Georgios Tsivgoulis
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Effects of carotid artery stenting on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment and carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Yong Cheng; Yan Jiang Wang; Jia Chuan Yan; Rui Zhou; Hua Dong Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 10.  Recommendations for carotid stenting in Korea.

Authors:  Hyuk Won Chang; Shang Hun Shin; Sang-Il Suh; Hae Woong Jeong; Dae Chul Suh
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2015-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.