Literature DB >> 16900828

Why walkers slip: shine is not a reliable cue for slippery ground.

Amy S Joh1, Karen E Adolph, Margot R Campbell, Marion A Eppler.   

Abstract

In a series of four studies, we investigated the visual cues that walkers use to predict slippery ground surfaces and tested whether visual information is reliable for specifying low-friction conditions. In Study 1, 91% of participants surveyed responded that they would use shine to identify upcoming slippery ground. Studies 2-4 confirmed participants' reliance on shine to predict slip. Participants viewed ground surfaces varying in gloss, paint color, and viewing distance under indoor and outdoor lighting conditions. Shine and slip ratings and functional walking judgments were related to surface gloss level and to surface coefficient of friction (COF). However, judgments were strongly affected by surface color, viewing distance, and lighting conditions--extraneous factors that do not change the surface COF. Results suggest that, although walkers rely on shine to predict slippery ground, shine is not a reliable visual cue for friction. Poor visual information for friction may underlie the high prevalence of friction-related slips and falls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16900828     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  6 in total

1.  Rate of recalibration to changing affordances for squeezing through doorways reveals the role of feedback.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Frank A Somoano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Infants' perception of affordances of slopes under high- and low-friction conditions.

Authors:  Karen E Adolph; Amy S Joh; Marion A Eppler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Motor Development: Embodied, Embedded, Enculturated, and Enabling.

Authors:  Karen E Adolph; Justine E Hoch
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Touch influences perceived gloss.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Iona S Kerrigan; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  State of science: occupational slips, trips and falls on the same level.

Authors:  Wen-Ruey Chang; Sylvie Leclercq; Thurmon E Lockhart; Roger Haslam
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.778

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.