Literature DB >> 16899996

MMSE scores decline at a greater rate in frontotemporal degeneration than in AD.

Tiffany W Chow1, Linda S Hynan, Anne M Lipton.   

Abstract

The clinical diagnostic criteria for frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) include relative preservation of memory and visuospatial function, in contradistinction to characteristics of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) contains items to assess these areas of cognition. In a retrospective case-control study of participants at two institutionally-based AD centers, we determined whether total MMSE and MMSE subscores would reflect the disease progression projected by the clinical criteria of FTD vs. AD. Participants were 44 subjects with FTD (7 pathologically confirmed) and 45 with pathologically confirmed AD. Each subject had at least two MMSEs with minimum inter-test intervals of 9 months. We compared annualized rates of change for total MMSE scores and cognitive domain subscores over time and between groups by two independent samples t-tests and proportion tests. The total MMSE score (p = 0.03) and language subscore (p = 0.02) showed a greater rate of decline for the FTD group than the AD group, although the constructional praxis item declined less rapidly in the FTD group (p = 0.018). Changes in MMSE subscores paralleled the clinical diagnostic criteria for FTD. The more rapid progression on the language subscore was observed in both language and behavioral variants of FTD. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899996      PMCID: PMC1592245          DOI: 10.1159/000094870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord        ISSN: 1420-8008            Impact factor:   2.959


  30 in total

1.  Neuropsychological performance of right- and left-frontotemporal dementia compared to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J Razani; K B Boone; B L Miller; A Lee; D Sherman
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Frontal lobe dementia with novel tauopathy: sporadic multiple system tauopathy with dementia.

Authors:  E H Bigio; A M Lipton; S H Yen; M L Hutton; M Baker; P Nacharaju; C L White; P Davies; W Lin; D W Dickson
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.685

4.  Comparison of neuropsychological functioning in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  N A Pachana; K B Boone; B L Miller; J L Cummings; N Berman
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Can frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease be differentiated using a brief battery of tests?

Authors:  C A Gregory; M Orrell; B Sahakian; J R Hodges
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.485

6.  A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  P S Mathuranath; P J Nestor; G E Berrios; W Rakowicz; J R Hodges
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Memory encoding and retrieval in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Guila Glosser; Jennifer L Gallo; Christopher M Clark; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Behavioral quantitation is more sensitive than cognitive testing in frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Andrew Kertesz; Wilda Davidson; Patricia McCabe; David Munoz
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.703

9.  Survival in frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  J R Hodges; R Davies; J Xuereb; J Kril; G Halliday
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Cognitive profiles differ in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal dementia and AD.

Authors:  K Rascovsky; D P Salmon; G J Ho; D Galasko; G M Peavy; L A Hansen; L J Thal
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  16 in total

1.  Reliability of repeated cognitive assessment of dementia using a brief computerized battery.

Authors:  Dustin Hammers; Elizabeth Spurgeon; Kelly Ryan; Carol Persad; Judith Heidebrink; Nancy Barbas; Roger Albin; Kirk Frey; David Darby; Bruno Giordani
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.035

2.  MMSE scores decline at a greater rate in frontotemporal degeneration than in AD.

Authors:  Tiffany W Chow; Linda S Hynan; Anne M Lipton
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 2.959

3.  Using the Folstein Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) to explore methodological issues in cognitive aging research.

Authors:  Todd Monroe; Michael Carter
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 4.  The epidemiology of frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Chiadi U Onyike; Janine Diehl-Schmid
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04

5.  Comparative quantitative study of 'signature' pathological lesions in the hippocampus and adjacent gyri of 12 neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Armstrong; Nigel J Cairns
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Is There an Association between Norton Scale and Cognitive Impairment in Hip Fractured Elderly Patients?

Authors:  Nadya Kagansky; Ilia Stambler; Eliyahu Hayim Mizrahi
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.959

7.  Estimating severity of illness and disability in Frontotemporal Dementia: Preliminary analysis of the Dementia Disability Rating (DDR).

Authors:  Chiadi U Onyike; Kelly L Sloane; Shawn F Smyth; Brian S Appleby; David M Blass; Peter V Rabins
Journal:  Acta Neuropsychol       Date:  2011

Review 8.  The early neuropsychological and behavioral characteristics of frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Dana Wittenberg; Katherine L Possin; Katya Rascovsky; Katherine P Rankin; Bruce L Miller; Joel H Kramer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 7.444

9.  Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Katya Rascovsky; John R Hodges; David Knopman; Mario F Mendez; Joel H Kramer; John Neuhaus; John C van Swieten; Harro Seelaar; Elise G P Dopper; Chiadi U Onyike; Argye E Hillis; Keith A Josephs; Bradley F Boeve; Andrew Kertesz; William W Seeley; Katherine P Rankin; Julene K Johnson; Maria-Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Howard Rosen; Caroline E Prioleau-Latham; Albert Lee; Christopher M Kipps; Patricia Lillo; Olivier Piguet; Jonathan D Rohrer; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren; Nick C Fox; Douglas Galasko; David P Salmon; Sandra E Black; Marsel Mesulam; Sandra Weintraub; Brad C Dickerson; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Florence Pasquier; Vincent Deramecourt; Florence Lebert; Yolande Pijnenburg; Tiffany W Chow; Facundo Manes; Jordan Grafman; Stefano F Cappa; Morris Freedman; Murray Grossman; Bruce L Miller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The Role of Brief Global Cognitive Tests and Neuropsychological Expertise in the Detection and Differential Diagnosis of Dementia.

Authors:  Marianna Riello; Elena Rusconi; Barbara Treccani
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.