Literature DB >> 16899117

Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17).

Zbigniew K Wszolek1, Yoshio Tsuboi, Bernardino Ghetti, Stuart Pickering-Brown, Yasuhiko Baba, William P Cheshire.   

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder, which has three cardinal features: behavioral and personality changes, cognitive impairment, and motor symptoms. FTDP-17 was defined during the International Consensus Conference in Ann Arbor, Michigan, in 1996. The prevalence and incidence remain unknown but FTDP-17 is an extremely rare condition. It is caused by mutations in the tau gene, which encodes a microtubule-binding protein. Over 100 families with 38 different mutations in the tau gene have been identified worldwide. The phenotype of FTDP-17 varies not only between families carrying different mutations but also between and within families carrying the same mutations. The pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the disorder are thought to be related to the altered proportion of tau isoforms or to the ability of tau to bind microtubules and to promote microtubule assembly. Definitive diagnosis of FTDP-17 requires a combination of characteristic clinical and pathological features and molecular genetic analysis. Genetic counseling should be offered to affected and at-risk individuals; for most subtypes, penetrance is incomplete. Currently, treatment for FTDP-17 is only symptomatic and supportive. The prognosis and rate of the disease's progression vary considerably among individual patients and genetic kindreds, ranging from life expectancies of several months to several years, and, in exceptional cases, as long as two decades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899117      PMCID: PMC1563447          DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-1-30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis        ISSN: 1750-1172            Impact factor:   4.123


Disease name and synonyms

Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17).

Definition/diagnostic criteria

The term frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 was defined during the International Consensus Conference in Ann Arbor, Michigan, in 1996 [1]. At the time, affected individuals with frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to the wld locus on chromosome 17 had been identified within 13 families. This syndrome is a familial disorder with autosomal dominant inheritance. The three major clinical features include behavioral disturbances, cognitive impairment, and parkinsonism. There are no strict diagnostic criteria for FTDP-17. Nevertheless, FTDP-17 should be considered in the differential diagnosis in the presence of one or more of the following [2]: • Age of onset of neurological symptoms between the third and fifth decades; • Progressive neuropsychiatric syndrome including personality and behavioral abnormalities and/or frontotemporal dementia; • Parkinsonism-plus syndrome (bradykinesia, rigidity, postural instability, paucity of resting tremor, and poor or no response to dopaminergic therapy) frequently associated with falls and supranuclear gaze palsy and less commonly associated with apraxia, dystonia, and lateralization; • Progressive speech difficulties from the onset of the illness; • Seizure disorder poorly controlled by standard anticonvulsant therapy; • Positive family history suggestive of autosomal dominant inheritance of a neurodegenerative disorder, even if there has been variability in clinical presentations.

Epidemiology

FTDP-17 is an extremely rare condition. Its prevalence and incidence remain unknown. Over 100 families with FTDP-17 have been reported to date in numerous countries (USA, Great Britain, Japan, Netherlands, France, Canada, Australia, Italy, Germany, Israel, Ireland, Spain and Sweden). Some of these families share a common founder [3]. We estimate that there have been about 50–600 patients described, with fewer than 70 individuals still living. Molecular genetic studies have identified 38 unique mutations in these families (Figure 1). The most common mutations, accounting for approximately 60% of known cases, are P301L, N279K and a splice site mutation (exon 10 +16) [4].
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the exons and introns of the tau gene localized on chromosome 17. The 38 mutations identified so far are presented.

Schematic representation of the exons and introns of the tau gene localized on chromosome 17. The 38 mutations identified so far are presented.

Etiology

Mutations in the tau gene account for the vast majority of FTDP-17 cases. Tau is a microtubule-binding protein abundant in neurons and glia. In neurons, it is predominantly expressed in axons. Tau binds to and stabilizes microtubules and promotes microtubule assembly. The majority of the currently known mutations in coding region occur within the microtubule-binding region of tau gene. Most known mutations in non-coding regions affect the splicing of exon 10 [4]. The pathogenetic mechanisms in FTDP-17 are thought to be related to the altered proportion of tau isoforms or to the ability of tau to bind microtubules and to promote microtubule assembly. Mutations in tau gene associated with FTDP-17 fall into two broad mechanistic groups. One group contains coding mutations (missense and two deletions) that, in recombinant protein studies and in transfected cell assays, have been shown to disrupt the binding of tau to microtubules. In addition, the majority of these mutations have also been shown to accelerate the aggregation of recombinant tau in the presence of polyanions. Thus, overall, these mutations are predicted both to increase the proportion of tau that is unbound to microtubules and available for aggregation and also to increase directly the tendency of the unbound tau to form filaments. The second group of tau mutations appears to cause disease by disrupting the alternative splicing of exon 10 and hence the ratio of 4R: 3R tau. These mutations comprise a mixture of coding changes, within exon 10 (N279K, delK280, L284L, N296N/H, delN296, P301L/S, G303V, and S305S/N) and also intronic mutations close to the 5' splice site of exon 10 (at positions +3, +11, +12, +13, +14, +16, +19, and +29). All but three of these mutations have been demonstrated to increase the splicing-in of exon 10 and hence the proportion of 4R tau. The exceptions are delK280, +19, and, +29 mutations that show increased 3R: 4R ratio as compared with normal condition [5]. The +29 mutation has been detected in both affected individuals with the FTD phenotype and normal controls [6-8]. Therefore, it is still unclear whether this splicing mutation contributes to disease development.

Families with FTD linked to chromosome 17q21 without tau mutations

Six FTDP-17 kindreds have been identified in which neither a tau mutation nor tau pathology has been detected, despite genetic linkage to the same region of chromosome 17q21 that contains the tau gene [7-12]. Their clinical phenotype is indistinguishable from that of cases with known tau mutations. The specific mutations and their clinical presentations are summarized in Table 1. Studies of this group of individuals provide valuable information for elucidating the etiology of FTDP-17, as it introduces the possibility that further mutations in the introns or regulatory regions of tau, or other causative genes near the tau locus may yet be discovered. For example, mutations in the intronic sequence adjacent to the stem loop structure in exon 10 have been identified that alter tau splicing to increase soluble 3R tau, leading to increased tau proteolysis and neuronal apoptosis without deposition of insoluble tau aggregates [13].
Table 1

Families with FTD linked to chromosome 17q21 without tau mutations.

AuthorFroelich et al. [7]Rosso et al. [8]Lendon et al. [9]*Rademakers et al. [10]Kertesz et al. [11]Bird et al. [12]
KarolinskaDutch IIIHDDD21083KerteszSeattle B
Pedigree
OriginSwedenGermanyUSANetherlandsCanadaUSA
No. of FA/G/AI20/4/11NA/4/32>10,000/8/2473/4/1630/4/1052/4/18
Mean ± SD age at onset, y51 ± 3.661.2 ± 8.860.4 ± 0.564.9 ± 8.963.4 ± 12.554.7 ± 7.5
Mean ± SD disease duration, y2.9 ± 0.88.6 ± 2.96.9 ± 2.26.6 ± 2.64.0 ± 2.710.1 ± 5.2
Clinical characteristics
 Initial signDD/PCDD/PCPCPC (PS)
 Dementia++++++
 Other featuresApraxia, dysphagiaLDLD, EP, hemiparesisLDLD, dysphagiaMyoclonus
Predominant clinical phenotypeFTDFTDFTD (HDD)FTDFTD (Pick complex)FTD
Pathologic findingsSevere frontal lobe degeneration with spongy changes and gliosisSevere frontal lobe degeneration with neuronal loss and gliosis Neuronal loss in the hippo-campusSevere frontal lobe degeneration with neuronal loss and gliosis Neuronal loss in the hippocampusFrontotemporal degeneration with neuronal loss and gliosisFrontotemporal lobe degenerationTau-positive NFT in the neocortex and limbic system
Ubiquitin-positive neuronal intranuclear inclusions++NR++NR
Max lod score for chromosome 17q212.683.463.685.511.681.11

+, present; AI, affected individual; D, dementia; EP, extrapyramidal signs; FA, family member; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; G, generation; HDD, hereditary dysphasic dementia; LD, language difficulties; NA, not available; NFT, neurofibrillary tangles; NR, not reported; PC, personality change; PS, psychiatric symptom.

*Data are from individuals with some form of dementia in recent generations of the family

Families with FTD linked to chromosome 17q21 without tau mutations. +, present; AI, affected individual; D, dementia; EP, extrapyramidal signs; FA, family member; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; G, generation; HDD, hereditary dysphasic dementia; LD, language difficulties; NA, not available; NFT, neurofibrillary tangles; NR, not reported; PC, personality change; PS, psychiatric symptom. *Data are from individuals with some form of dementia in recent generations of the family Extensive ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative, cytoplasmic and intranuclear neuronal inclusions have been observed in layer II of the cerebral cortex and in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus in three of the kindreds lacking a tau mutation [14,15]. The intranuclear inclusions are unlikely to result from a trinucleotide repeat expansion mutation in that they failed to stain when exposed to an antibody that recognizes proteins with polyglutamine tracts [7]. Descriptions of similar intranuclear inclusions in patients with FTD and motor neuron disease [14,15] suggest that they may turn out to be specific for chromosome 17-linked FTD without tau mutations.

Clinical description

Symptoms and signs

The onset of FTDP-17 is usually insidious. Affected individuals who have reached the fully developed stage of the disease present with a constellation of signs including at least two of the three cardinal features of FTDP-17. • Behavioral and personality disturbances; • Cognitive deficits; • Motor dysfunction (typically signs of parkinsonism-plus syndrome). Clinical features of FTDP-17 vary considerably among affected individuals, regardless of whether they inherit the same or different mutations. Even members within a family, for example, can vary in their clinical presentation. The specific mutations and their characteristic clinical presentations are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Phenotypes of specific tau gene mutations seen in FTDP-17 patients.

Exon
Clinical feature1911121310Intron 10
Average age at onset, y
 ≤30S352LP301S
G335V
 31–40L266VS320FG389RdelN296
S305N
G303V
 41–50G272VK317ME342VN279K+3+11+14
K257TP301L+16
 >50R5HI260VL315RV337MR406Wdel280K+12+13+19
R5LQ336RT427ML284L+29
K369IN296H
S305S
N296N
Average duration, y
 ≤5R5HL266VL315RS352LG389Rdel280K+29
R5LK257TdelN296
N296H
S305N
G303V
 6–10G272V I260VK317ME342V Q336RT427MN279KP301L+11+12
K369IS305S
G335VN296N
L284L
P301S
 11–15S320FV337M+3+14+16
 >15R406W
First sign
 ParkinsonismR5LK317MN279K+3+11
P301L
delN296
S305S
N296N
G303V
 DementiaR5HK257TS320FQ336RR406WL284L+3+12+29
L315RdelN296
 Personality changeG272VL315RV337MT427MP301L+12+14+16
I260VE342VN296H+19+29
K369IS305S
G335VS305N
Parkinsonism
 Early-prominentK317MN279K+11
delN296
S305S
N296N
G303V
 Late-prominentP301S+3+12+14
N296H+16+29
 Rare-minimalR5LG272VS352LP301L
S305N
Dementia
 Early-prominentL266VS320FQ336RR406WdelN296+12+29
K257TL315RG335VT427MS305S
I260V
 Late-prominentG272VV337Mdel280K+3+11+13
K369IL284L
P301L
P301S
S305N
 Rare-minimalK317MN279KG303V
Personality change
 Early-prominentL266VL315RV337MR406Wdel280K+12+14+16
G272VK369IT427ML284L+19+29
I260VG335VP301L
K257TP301S
S305S
S305N
Other clinical features
 Language sG272VS320FQ336RG389RN279K+14+16+29
 difficultieK257TL315RT427ML284L
I260VK317MN296H
P301L
S305S
N296N
G303V
 Late mutismL315RV337MR406WN279K+16+29
T427Mdel280K
N296H
P301S
S305N
 Eye movementN279K+3
 abnormalitiesN296H
P301S
delN296
S305S
N296N
G303V
 EpilepsyS352LP301S
 MyoclonusV337MN279K+11
S352LP301S
 Pyramidal signsN279K+3+12
P301S
N296N
G303V
S305S
 AmyotrophyK317MP301LN296N+14
Phenotypes of specific tau gene mutations seen in FTDP-17 patients. The behavioral and personality abnormalities can include disinhibition, apathy, defective judgment, compulsive behavior, hyper-religiosity, neglect of personal hygiene, alcoholism, illicit drug addiction, verbal and physical aggressiveness, family abuse, and other manifestations. While cognitive disturbances occur, memory, orientation, and visuospatial function are relatively preserved during early stages of the disease. Progressive speech difficulties with non-fluent aphasia and disorders of executive functions can be seen initially. Subsequently, memory, orientation, and visuospatial functions progressively deteriorate, while echolalia, palilalia, verbal and vocal perseverations develop. Finally, progressive dementia and mutism occur. Motor signs are also prominent. Parkinsonism can be the first manifestation of the disease, and in this regard it is important to note that some FTDP-17 patients were initially misdiagnosed as having Parkinson's disease or sporadic progressive supranuclear palsy. In some families, however, the parkinsonism occurs late in the course of the illness or not at all. The parkinsonism in FTDP-17 is characterized by rather symmetrical bradykinesia, postural instability, rigidity affecting equally axial and appendicular musculature, (usually) absence of resting tremor, and poor or no responsiveness to levodopa therapy. Other motor disturbances seen in FTDP-17 include dystonia unrelated to medications, supranuclear gaze palsy, upper and lower motor neuron dysfunction, myoclonus, postural and action tremors, eyelid opening and closing apraxia, dysphagia, and dysarthria.

Phenotype-genotype correlations

It is still very difficult to perform precise phenotype/genotype correlations in FTDP-17 since the clinical information available for some families is not detailed enough in or not accessible at all. Nevertheless, some patterns have emerged. The families with FTDP-17 fall into two major groups [16]: • dementia predominant phenotype; • parkinsonism-plus predominant phenotype. The dementia predominant phenotype is more common and is usually seen in families with mutations in exons 1, 9, 11, 12, 13 and in exon 10. The parkinsonism-plus predominant phenotype is usually seen in families with intronic and exonic mutations affecting exon 10 and leading to the selective overproduction of 4R tau isoforms. These categorizations should be viewed cautiously until more clinical and pathologic data become available.

Diagnostic methods

Characteristic clinical and pathological features of FTDP-17 coupled with a molecular genetic analysis of the tau gene are essential steps for a diagnosis. Imaging studies such as computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can assist in establishing a diagnosis, mainly by excluding other diagnostic possibilities such as the presence of a brain tumor, abscess, multi-infarct state, or hydrocephalus.

Imaging studies

CT and MRI of the head usually demonstrate some dilation of the ventricular system and frontal, temporal, and parietal cortical atrophy (Figure 2A) [17-22]. MRI T2-weighted images may show accumulation of paramagnetic substances (iron) in mesencephalic nuclei [19]. In some kindreds, asymmetrical cortical atrophy is present. Functional imaging studies such as single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) also demonstrate significant abnormalities. PET with 2-deoxy-2-fluoro- [18F]-D-glucose (FDG) usually shows reduced frontal-parietal-temporal uptake patterns similar to those seen in sporadic frontotemporal dementia (FTD). PET with [18F]-fluoro-L-dopa (6FD) and [11C]-raclopride tracers reveals uptake abnormalities distinct from those seen in PD, in which the putamen is affected more than the caudate nucleus [23].
Figure 2

A) Head MRI (left panels) demonstrates cortical atrophy in frontal and temporal lobes. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-fluoro- [18F]-D-glucose (FDG) PET (right panels) demonstrates hypometabolism in the same cortical regions. Middle panels show co-registration of MRI and FDG PET studies. B) Thermoregulatory sweating tests in the same patient with PPND. Shaded areas represent sweating over the anterior body surface. Distal anhidrosis is seen.

A) Head MRI (left panels) demonstrates cortical atrophy in frontal and temporal lobes. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-fluoro- [18F]-D-glucose (FDG) PET (right panels) demonstrates hypometabolism in the same cortical regions. Middle panels show co-registration of MRI and FDG PET studies. B) Thermoregulatory sweating tests in the same patient with PPND. Shaded areas represent sweating over the anterior body surface. Distal anhidrosis is seen.

Laboratory findings

The routine serum, urine, cerebrospinal fluid and other body fluid studies are usually negative. Electroencephalography (EEG) findings are normal early in the disease process and progress to diffuse slowing as the disease advances, although slowing can sometimes be seen earlier in the course of the FTDP-17 illness [24]. In sporadic FTD, the slowing of background rhythms usually occurs late in the course of the illness. In individuals with the P301S mutation, EEG demonstrates sharp waves, spikes and epileptiform discharges [25]. Nerve conduction studies are normal. Electromyography may show neurogenic patterns related to lower motor neuron dysfunction [26]. Evoked potential studies are usually normal. Autonomic testing may show sudomotor impairment but not orthostatic hypotension (Figure 2B) [27]. There is very little information available on sleep studies in FTDP-17 kindreds. In a clinicopathological study of an affected patient with G389R mutation, a relationship between the reduced delta sleep and the decreased cortical and subcortical connectivity was reported [28]. Neuropsychological evaluation is of paramount significance in determining the severity and extent of cognitive and behavioral dysfunction in this disorder.

Differential diagnosis

Clinically, FTDP-17 may mimic several neurodegenerative diseases. The differential diagnosis of FTDP-17 includes disorders with initial signs such as behavioral and personality abnormalities, parkinsonism, lower motor neuron dysfunction or cognitive impairments. In the absence of a positive family history or molecular genetic data, FTDP-17 is most frequently confused with Pick's disease, sporadic progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Other familial frontotemporal dementias, parkinson-plus syndromes, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA) should be excluded. A neuropathologic examination coupled with molecular genetic analysis of the tau gene are essential steps towards distinguishing FTDP-17 from other neurodegenerative diseases associated with tau deposition. The pathologic analysis should include immunohistochemical studies using multiple anti-tau antibodies.

Genetic counseling

Affected individuals should be counseled regarding the estimated probability of passing the genetic bases for their illness on to their offspring. As FTDP-17 is an autosomal dominantly inherited condition, each offspring of an affected individual will carry a 50% risk of inheriting the abnormal gene. Some of these mutations can be detected through genetic testing. The individual who inherits a mutation will not necessarily develop the same clinical syndrome as the parent, because penetrance may be incomplete, neurologic manifestations vary greatly even within families, or the individual might die from unrelated causes. In the case of the pallido-ponto-nigral degeneration (PPND) subtype of FTDP-17, however, penetrance is complete and virtually all individuals who inherit the mutation will become symptomatic during middle age. At-risk individuals may sometimes choose to adopt rather than bear their own children. When faced with the option of genetic testing, some people prefer the greater certainty that a genetic diagnosis may afford when planning life decisions, while others find not knowing to be a lesser emotional burden as well as a lesser risk of being denied healthcare should their insurance carrier learn the test result. In either case the patient's choice should be respected. Inquiring into the family history can also identify relatives who may be at risk of having inherited the genetic basis for FTDP-17 and who thus may be presymptomatic. Clinical genetic testing of affected and presymptomatic individuals is commercially available for some mutations. However, there tends to be little interest among at-risk family members to undergo clinical genetic testing [29].

Antenatal diagnosis

Once a genetic basis for a subtype of FTDP-17 is discovered and testing for that gene becomes commercially available, it becomes possible, in principle, to identify that gene antenatally by sampling amniotic fluid or by preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Genetic counseling should accompany antenatal genetic diagnosis.

Management including treatment

Currently, a curative treatment for FTDP-17 does not exist, and most patients respond poorly, if at all, to levodopa. Palliative and symptomatic interventions are the mainstay of treatment. Physical therapy can be helpful to preserve some measure of mobility and independence in activities of daily living and to reduce the risk of falling. Stool softening agents are recommended for constipation. Speech therapy, swallowing assessment, and switching to a softer diet may be helpful for dysphagia. Anticholinergics may be helpful for sialorrhea or urinary frequency but carry the risk of aggravating mental confusion. Clozapine or quetiapine may be helpful for psychosis not explained by systemic infection or responsive to medication withdrawal. Antidepressant medications may be indicated for concurrent depression. Bed-bound patients will require frequent repositioning or air flow mattresses. Patients should be encouraged to discuss their treatment preferences with their families and their physicians and to indicate their choices by advance directives.

Prognosis

The prognosis varies considerably. Most patients with FTDP-17 will experience several months to one or two years of moderate impairment followed by an unremitting downward course of physical and cognitive decline. The rate of progression varies greatly among individual patients and genetic kindreds, ranging from life expectancies of several months to several years, and, in exceptional cases, as long as two decades. In addition to the clinical features described above, in the late stages of illness these patients often develop secondary medical problems associated with immobility including falling injuries and respiratory and urinary tract infections.

Unresolved questions

It is hoped that further research will identify the genetic modifiers and environmental factors that influence the variable penetrance and clinical expression of FTDP-17. The development of transgenic mice may provide an opportunity to test novel therapeutic agents in the near future.
  27 in total

1.  A Japanese patient with frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism by a tau P301S mutation.

Authors:  M Yasuda; K Yokoyama; T Nakayasu; Y Nishimura; M Matsui; T Yokoyama; K Miyoshi; C Tanaka
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Familial frontotemporal dementia with ubiquitin-positive inclusions is linked to chromosome 17q21-22.

Authors:  S M Rosso; W Kamphorst; B de Graaf; R Willemsen; R Ravid; M F Niermeijer; M G Spillantini; P Heutink; J C van Swieten
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Mutations in the tau gene that cause an increase in three repeat tau and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Prudence M Stanford; Claire E Shepherd; Glenda M Halliday; William S Brooks; Peter W Schofield; Henry Brodaty; Ralph N Martins; John B J Kwok; Peter R Schofield
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 4.  Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17.

Authors:  Zbigniew K Wszołek; Jerzy Słowiński; Maciej Golan; Dennis W Dickson
Journal:  Folia Neuropathol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Slow wave and rem sleep mechanisms are differently altered in hereditary pick disease associated with the TAU G389R mutation.

Authors:  A Gemignani; P Pietrini; J R Murrell; B S Glazier; P Zolo; M Guazzelli; B Ghetti
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Familial frontotemporal dementia with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions.

Authors:  A Kertesz; T Kawarai; E Rogaeva; P St George-Hyslop; P Poorkaj; T D Bird; D G Munoz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Tau gene mutation G389R causes a tauopathy with abundant pick body-like inclusions and axonal deposits.

Authors:  J R Murrell; M G Spillantini; P Zolo; M Guazzelli; M J Smith; M Hasegawa; F Redi; R A Crowther; P Pietrini; B Ghetti; M Goedert
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  Interest in genetic testing in pallido-ponto-nigral degeneration (PPND): a family with frontotemporal dementia with Parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17.

Authors:  C A McRae; G Diem; T G Yamazaki; A Mitek; Z K Wszolek
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.089

9.  Extended investigation of tau and mutation screening of other candidate genes on chromosome 17q21 in a Swedish FTDP-17 family.

Authors:  Susanne Froelich Fabre; Pia Axelman; Asa Almkvist; Hans Basun; Lars Lannfelt
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.568

10.  Clinical characteristics of a family with chromosome 17-linked disinhibition-dementia-parkinsonism-amyotrophy complex.

Authors:  T Lynch; M Sano; K S Marder; K L Bell; N L Foster; R F Defendini; A A Sima; C Keohane; T G Nygaard; S Fahn
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  36 in total

1.  Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Thomas G Beach; Sarah E Monsell; Leslie E Phillips; Walter Kukull
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.685

2.  Redox proteomics analyses of the influence of co-expression of wild-type or mutated LRRK2 and Tau on C. elegans protein expression and oxidative modification: relevance to Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Fabio Di Domenico; Rukhsana Sultana; Andrew Ferree; Katelyn Smith; Eugenio Barone; Marzia Perluigi; Raffaella Coccia; William Pierce; Jian Cai; Cesare Mancuso; Rachel Squillace; Manfred Wiengele; Isabella Dalle-Donne; Benjamin Wolozin; D Allan Butterfield
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Tau as a biomarker of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Susanna Schraen-Maschke; Nicolas Sergeant; Claire-Marie Dhaenens; Stéphanie Bombois; Vincent Deramecourt; Marie-Laure Caillet-Boudin; Florence Pasquier; Claude-Alain Maurage; Bernard Sablonnière; Eugeen Vanmechelen; Luc Buée
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.851

4.  Profiling of Argonaute-2-loaded microRNAs in a mouse model of frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism-17.

Authors:  Aidan Kenny; Félix Hernández; Jesús Avila; José J Lucas; David C Henshall; Jochen Hm Prehn; Eva M Jiménez-Mateos; Tobias Engel
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-25

5.  Severe amygdala dysfunction in a MAPT transgenic mouse model of frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Casey Cook; Judy H Dunmore; Melissa E Murray; Kristyn Scheffel; Nawsheen Shukoor; Jimei Tong; Monica Castanedes-Casey; Virginia Phillips; Linda Rousseau; Michael S Penuliar; Aishe Kurti; Dennis W Dickson; Leonard Petrucelli; John D Fryer
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  HspB1 and Hsc70 chaperones engage distinct tau species and have different inhibitory effects on amyloid formation.

Authors:  Hannah E R Baughman; Amanda F Clouser; Rachel E Klevit; Abhinav Nath
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  The role of monogenic genes in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Xylena Reed; Sara Bandrés-Ciga; Cornelis Blauwendraat; Mark R Cookson
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 8.  The genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Rosa Rademakers; Mike Hutton
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 9.  Parkinsonian syndrome in familial frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Joanna Siuda; Shinsuke Fujioka; Zbigniew K Wszolek
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.891

Review 10.  Behind the curtain of tauopathy: a show of multiple players orchestrating tau toxicity.

Authors:  Yunpeng Huang; Zhihao Wu; Bing Zhou
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.