Literature DB >> 16897282

Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic oesophagectomy improves the quality of extended lymphadenectomy.

G B Cadière1, R Torres, G Dapri, E Capelluto, B Hainaux, J Himpens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy carries considerable morbidity due to parietal trauma. It is also technically extremely demanding because the difficult access even through a large thoracotomy requires the use of long instruments to reach the deepest recess in the chest cavity. Since the first thoracoscopic oesophagectomy reported by Cuschieri et al. [1] in 1992, different minimally invasive approaches have been proposed [2-12]. The aim of this video is to show the accurate and relative ease of an entirely thoracoscopic and laparoscopic oesophagectomy with an extended lymph node dissection of mediastinum in prone position (thoracoscopically) and celiac trunk (laparoscopically).
METHODS: Oesophagectomy by thoracoscopy, laparoscopy and cervicotomy was proposed in a 63-year-old man with a lower third oesophageal cancer. General anaesthesia was performed with a double-lumen endotracheal tube and the patient was placed in prone position. Surgeons were positioned at the right side of the patient. Only three trocars were needed. A 10 mm 30-degree angled scope was inserted in the 7th intercostal space on the posterior axillary line and the remaining two 5 mm trocars were inserted in the 5th and 9th intercostal spaces on the posterior axillary line. Prone position allows an excellent visibility of the operative field even in an only partially deflated lung. In order to achieve a good exposure, transitory pneumothorax with CO2 (14 mmHg) was performed. The mediastinal pleura overlying the oesophagus was incised and the arch of azygos vein was isolated, ligated and divided. The oesophagus was circumferentially mobilized from the thoracic inlet down to oesophageal hiatus. Para oesophageal and subcarinal lymph nodes were dissected so as to remain in block with the surgical specimen. A 28 F chest tube was inserted in the 8th intercostal space on the anterior axillary line. In the second stage the patient was placed in supine position and pneumoperitoneum was established. Five trocars were placed along an ideal semicircular line, with the concavity facing the subcostal margin and a 30-degree angled laparoscope was used. The lesser omentum was widely opened up the right pillar of the hiatus. Mobilization of the greater curvature of the stomach was performed preserving the right gastroepiploic artery. A wide Kocher maneuver was performed. Celiac lymphadenectomy started with skeletonization of the hepatic artery until the root of left gastric artery was reached. This artery and the left gastric vein were dissected, clipped and sectioned. All fatty tissue and lymph nodes along hepatic artery, left gastric artery and celiac trunk were resected in block with the surgical specimen. Multiple applications of a linear endoscopic stapler were used to create the gastric tube. Finally the distal oesophagus was dissected, until the thoracoscopic dissection field was joined. In the third stage a left lateral cervicotomy was performed and the cervical oesophagus was dissected down to the thoracoscopic dissection plane. Oesophagus and stomach were delivered through the cervical incision and an oesophagogastric anastomosis was created by a linear stapler technique. Cervical and abdominal drainages were installed.
RESULTS: The total operative time was 271 minutes (thoracoscopy: 106 minutes, laparoscopy 120 minutes and cervicotomy 45 minutes) and blood loss was about 100 ml. Histological examination demonstrated a squamous cell carcinoma. Both margins of resection were free of tumour and 29 lymph nodes were retrieved. The final stage was IIA (pT3N0Mx).
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic oesophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy is technically feasible and safe. Thoracoscopic oesophagectomy in prone position improves the quality of dissection because: The oesophagus and aorto-pulmonary window are reached under excellent visibility, despite a partially deflated lung, which because of gravity will always remain out of harm's way. For the same reason small to moderate bleeding will not obscure the operative field. Dissection with the long endoscopic instruments is more accurate due to the support provided by the entrance site at the parietal level and the ergonomic position of surgeon. This article contains a supplementary video.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897282     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-2020-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  D I Watson; N Davies; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Totally laparoscopic transhiatal esophago-gastrectomy without thoracic or cervical access. The least invasive surgery for adenocarcinoma of the cardia?

Authors:  R Costi; J Himpens; J Bruyns; G B Cadière
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Shimi; S Banting
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1992-02

5.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  J D Luketich; P R Schauer; N A Christie; T L Weigel; S Raja; H C Fernando; R J Keenan; N T Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus. A 6 year experience.

Authors:  B M Smithers; D C Gotley; D McEwan; I Martin; J Bessell; L Doyle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Right thoracoscopically assisted oesophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  O J McAnena; J Rogers; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy: technique and initial results.

Authors:  D Gossot; P Fourquier; M Celerier
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty.

Authors:  A L DePaula; K Hashiba; E A Ferreira; R A de Paula; E Grecco
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-02

10.  A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  15 in total

1.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer with situs inversus totalis.

Authors:  Yasumichi Yagi; Yutaka Yoshimitsu; Tsutomu Maeda; Hiroshi Sakuma; Michio Watanabe; Masuo Nakai; Hiroshi Ueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for esophageal cancer with the patient in prone position.

Authors:  Roberto Petri; Marco Zuccolo; Marco Brizzolari; Luca Rossit; Alessandro Rosignoli; Vittorio Durastante; Gianfranco Petrin; Lucio De Cecchis; Mario Sorrentino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kazuo Koyanagi; Soji Ozawa; Yuji Tachimori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Hironori Iwasaki; Kiitiro Kobayashi; Akihiko Uchiyama; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Toshihiro Masatsugu; Kenta Koike; Kouji Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy with the patient in the semi-prone position: initial experience and benefits of lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Takuro Miyazaki; Takeshi Nagayasu; Naoya Yamasaki; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Keitaro Matsumoto; Tsutomu Tagawa; Masayuki Obatake; Atsushi Nanashima; Shigekazu Hidaka; Tomayoshi Hayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-04-28

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Christy M Dunst; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Arin Kumar Saha; Christopher D Sutton; Henry Sue-Ling; Simon P L Dexter; Abeezar I Sarela
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Dapri; J Himpens; G B Cadière
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Three-field transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy in the management of carcinoma esophagus-a single--center experience with a review of literature.

Authors:  Sivaram Ganesamoni; Arvind Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.