Literature DB >> 16897027

[Operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures with helix wire].

F Müller1, R Voithenleitner, C Schuster, P Angele, B Weigel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2002, a total of 50 patients with a dislocated or unstable fracture of the proximal humerus were treated surgically with a titanium helix wire introduced retrogradely into the medullary cavity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fracture classification showed 8 cases of a two-fragment fracture, 32 cases of a three-fragment fracture, and 10 cases of a so-called four-fragment fracture. A retrospective radiographic and medical review of all 50 patients showed postoperative complications in 24% of the cases; in 8 cases (16%) secondary loss of retention occurred with consecutive projection of the helix wires into the subacromial joint space. There were two cases each (4%) of perforation of the helix wire into the joint space without loss of retention and fracture dehiscence because of a blocking mechanism by the helix wire in the subcapital fracture gap. The postoperative revision rate was 18% (9/50) as a result. Of 50 patients with a titanium helix wire, 38 (76%) were reviewed after an average of 23 months (12-31). Radiologically partial necrosis of the head of the humerus was seen in two patients and there was necrosis of the head of the humerus with pseudarthrosis in one patient, which had a negative effect on the Constant score.
RESULTS: Because of a change of procedure (n=5) and intercurrent deaths (n=5) only 2 of 12 patients, in whom complications had occurred postoperatively, could be followed up clinically; the results of the follow-up are sure to be distorted by this selection effect. Of 38 patients, 32 (84%) showed very good to good results functionally; the average Constant score was 74 points and the average age- and sex-specific corrected score was 92%. DISCUSSION: Thus, the procedure does not achieve better functional results compared to other rigid and semirigid internal fixation methods while it has a high complication and revision rate compared to other rigid and semirigid internal fixation methods. Moreover, early functional treatment is not possible so that the titanium helix wire represents a retention aid rather than stable internal fixation. Overall we cannot recommend the procedure for the operative management of proximal humerus fractures further and have abandoned it ourselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897027     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1088-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  21 in total

1.  [Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Is the T-plate still adequate osteosynthesis procedure?].

Authors:  H Bäthis; M Tingart; B Bouillon; T Tiling
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 0.942

2.  Helix wire osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: unacceptable nonunion rate in two- and three-part fractures.

Authors:  K Raissadat; P-J Struben; C J M van Loon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Percutaneous minimal osteosynthesis of fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients.

Authors:  U Zingg; D Brunnschweiler; H Keller; U Metzger
Journal:  Swiss Surg       Date:  2002

4.  Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.

Authors:  A J Wijgman; W Roolker; T W Patt; E L F B Raaymakers; R K Marti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  [Hemi-arthroplasty--primary or secondary measure for 3- and 4-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly?].

Authors:  U Bosch; R W Fremerey; M Skutek; P Lobenhoffer; H Tscherne
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  [The cannulated blade plate 90 degrees for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients].

Authors:  M Fuchs; A Losch; K M Stürmer
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.942

7.  The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  C M Court-Brown; A Garg; M M McQueen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-08

8.  Operative treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures: two-year results in 99 cases.

Authors:  M Hessmann; L Gotzen; H Gehling; F Baumgaertel; I Klingelhoeffer
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.090

9.  [Stabilization of proximal humeral fractures with the intramedullary dynamic titanium helix wire].

Authors:  Jochen Erhart; Thomas Heinz; Raimund Schuster; Manfred Greitbauer; Vilmos Vécsei
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  [Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate].

Authors:  R Hente; J Kampshoff; B Kinner; B Füchtmeier; M Nerlich
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.000

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Intramedullary claw for stabilization of proximal humerus fractures: a comparison with other semirigid techniques].

Authors:  V Seyr; S Heel; M Dünser
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The treatment of dislocated humeral head fractures with a new proximal intramedullary nail system.

Authors:  Bernd Füchtmeier; Stefan Bröckner; Reiner Hente; Mohamad Maghsudi; Michael Nerlich; Lukas Prantl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new gliding screw concept for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Y P Acklin; I Zderic; J A Inzana; S Grechenig; R Schwyn; R G Richards; B Gueorguiev
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 5.853

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.