Literature DB >> 16896872

Morphological analysis of the proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography.

James B Stiehl1, Donald Jacobson, Guilermo Carrera.   

Abstract

The anatomy of the proximal femur was studied in 35 specimens using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and compared with anatomical sections studied by plane radiography and gross dissection. We found the primary supporting structure of the femoral head to be the primary compressive strut, which is a dense column of trabecular bone projecting from the pressure buttress of the medial femoral neck to the epiphyseal scar. Trabecular bone mushroomed from the epiphyseal scar and terminated at right angles to the cortex of the femoral head. We believe the primary compressive strut is the predominant load-bearing structure connecting the femoral head to the femoral neck, as many specimens lacked continuity of the head cortex to the femoral neck. Based on the CT number, the primary compressive strut had similar bone density to cortical structures such as the lesser trochanter, calcar femorale and posterior lateral femoral cortex. Ward's triangle lacked structural integrity in many cases, and we doubt the significance of tensile trabculae for sharing load. Surgical techniques such as femoral fracture fixation, resurfacing hip arthroplasty and allograft transplantation may benefit from this knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896872      PMCID: PMC2267581          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0182-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography.

Authors:  S M Snyder; E Schneider
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study.

Authors:  J C Lotz; T N Gerhart; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Three-dimensional anatomy of the cancellous structures within the proximal femur from computed tomography data.

Authors:  R P Elke; E J Cheal; C Simmons; R Poss
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  [In vivo measurement of hip joint stress. 1. Physical therapy].

Authors:  G Bergmann; A Rohlmann; F Graichen
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

5.  Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture.

Authors:  D R Carter; T E Orr; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The anatomic basis of femoral component design.

Authors:  P C Noble; J W Alexander; L J Lindahl; D T Yew; W M Granberry; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single-energy quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  S I Esses; J C Lotz; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.

Authors:  P C Noble; G G Box; E Kamaric; M J Fink; J W Alexander; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data.

Authors:  T J Beck; A C Looker; C B Ruff; H Sievanen; H W Wahner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Structural grafting of the acetabulum.

Authors:  H P Chandler
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Fragility fractures of the proximal femur: review and update for radiologists.

Authors:  Kimia Khalatbari Kani; Jack A Porrino; Hyojeong Mulcahy; Felix S Chew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Changes in proximal femoral mineral geometry precede the onset of radiographic hip osteoarthritis: The study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M K Javaid; N E Lane; D C Mackey; L-Y Lui; N K Arden; T J Beck; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-07

Review 3.  The paradox of Wolff's theories.

Authors:  A Hammer
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Subchondral bone density distribution in the human femoral head.

Authors:  David A Wright; Michael Meguid; Omri Lubovsky; Cari M Whyne
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Computer Navigation-Aided Excision of Proximal Femoral Osteochondroma: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Chun Ming Chan; Feng Yu; Yuan Li; Xiaohui Niu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Fracture risk predictions based on statistical shape and density modeling of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Todd L Bredbenner; Robert L Mason; Lorena M Havill; Eric S Orwoll; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Morphology of Proximal Femur in South-West Coast of India.

Authors:  S U Kamath; S Agarwal; J Austine
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2020-11

8.  The Effect of Valgus Reduction on the Position of the Blade of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Eui Yub Jung; In Taek Oh; Sang Yeup Shim; Byung Ho Yoon; Yerl Bo Sung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-18

9.  Calcar Femorale in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Hip Secondary to Developmental Dysplasia.

Authors:  Tomonori Tetsunaga; Kazuo Fujiwara; Hirosuke Endo; Tomoko Tetsunaga; Naofumi Shiota; Toru Sato; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.