Literature DB >> 16896508

Intravenous pamidronate for pain relief in recent osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a randomized double-blind controlled study.

T Armingeat1, R Brondino, T Pham, V Legré, P Lafforgue.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We performed a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing intravenous pamidronate and placebo for pain relief in recent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCF).
METHODS: Patients suffered from recent (<21 days), painful, osteoporosis-related VCF. They were randomized to receive daily intravenous infusions of either placebo or 30 mg pamidronate for three consecutive days (total pamidronate: 90 mg). The main criterion for efficacy was improvement in standing pain on a 100-mm visual analogical scale (VAS) at day 7. Secondary criteria were standing pain at days 3 and 30; supine pain at days 3, 7, and 30; patients' overall assessment of improvement; mobility index; and number of "20% responders" and "50% responders" (respectively, 20% and 50% improvement in standing pain at days 7 and 30). Statistical analysis with non-parametric tests was carried out on an intention to treat basis.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study; 16 were given placebo and 16 pamidronate. Thirty-one patients were evaluated at day 7 and 26 patients at day 30. VAS pain decreased significantly in both groups at day 7 (placebo -23 mm, pamidronate -42 mm, p<0.01). The difference in pain scores between groups was -23.25 mm (confidence interval (CI) [-42.3; -4.2], p=0.018) at day 7 and -26 mm at day 30 (p=0.03), in favor of pamidronate. At day 7, there were 4 versus 12 "50% responders," respectively, in the placebo and in the pamidronate groups (likelihood ratio: 8.372; p=0.004) and 9 versus 14 "20% responders" (likelihood ratio: 4.038; p=0.044). At day 30, there were 5 versus 10 "50% responders," respectively, in the placebo and in the pamidronate groups, and 7 versus 11 "20% responders." Patients' overall assessment of improvement at day 7 was 37+/-26 mm in the placebo group and 59+/-30 mm in the pamidronate group (p=0.019), and 42+/-26 mm and 72+/-21 mm at day 30 (p=0.07). The two groups did not differ significantly at days 7 and 30 for supine pain, Schober index, or finger-ground distance. No significant adverse reaction related to treatment occurred.
CONCLUSION: Pamidronate provides rapid and sustained pain relief in patients with acute painful osteoporotic VCF and is well tolerated. Further investigations are needed to better define the place of pamidronate in the management of painful recent osteoporotic collapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896508     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0169-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  29 in total

Review 1.  Can bisphosphonates be given to patients with fractures?

Authors:  H Fleisch
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Long-term effect of incadronate disodium (YM-175) on fracture healing of femoral shaft in growing rats.

Authors:  C Li; S Mori; J Li; Y Kaji; T Akiyama; J Kawanishi; H Norimatsu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Analgesic effect of bisphosphonates in mice.

Authors:  A Bonabello; M R Galmozzi; T Bruzzese; G P Zara
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Alendronate in the prevention of bone loss after a fracture of the lower leg.

Authors:  E van der Poest Clement; M van Engeland; H Adèr; J C Roos; P Patka; P Lips
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Pamidronate in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced bone loss in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Mariana Salamoun; Yasser Abou Mourad; Aref Chehal; Ziad Salem; Ziyad Mahfoud; Ali Shamseddine
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Tolerability of opioids in patients with acute pain due to nonmalignant musculoskeletal disease. A hospital-based observational study.

Authors:  Anne Cherasse; Géraldine Muller; Paul Ornetti; Christine Piroth; Christian Tavernier; Jean Francis Maillefert
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Pharmaceutical treatment of symptomatic vertebral fractures in primary care.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; D Sykes; S Puffer; P Brown; C Cooper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Daily oral pamidronate in women and men with osteoporosis: a 3-year randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial with a 2-year open extension.

Authors:  Caroline Brumsen; Socrates E Papapoulos; Paul Lips; Petronella H L M Geelhoed-Duijvestijn; Neveen A T Hamdy; Jan Otto Landman; Eugene V McCloskey; J Coen Netelenbos; Ernest K J Pauwels; Jan C Roos; Rob M Valentijn; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of back pain caused by vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  J D Ringe; H Faber; O Bock; S Valentine; D Felsenberg; M Pfeifer; H W Minne; S Schwalen
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2002-07-10       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 10.  Analgesic efficacy of calcitonin for vertebral fracture pain.

Authors:  Linsey A Blau; James D Hoehns
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  14 in total

1.  An unusual cause of spinal bone loss detected by DXA scanning.

Authors:  H Davies; M W J Davie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Rzewuska; Manuela Ferreira; Andrew J McLachlan; Gustavo C Machado; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Safety of long-term bisphosphonate therapy for the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Yannis Dionyssiotis
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-07-21

Review 5.  Pamidronate treatment in rheumatology practice: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Gleb Slobodin; Itzhak Rosner; Joy Feld; Doron Rimar; Michael Rozenbaum; Nina Boulman; Majed Odeh
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Current management of pain associated with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Walter Pöllmann; Wolfgang Feneberg
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  [Risk assessment in pain therapy].

Authors:  D Schoeffel; H R Casser; M Bach; H G Kress; R Likar; H Locher; W Steinleitner; M Strohmeier; H Brunner; R D Treede; W Zieglgänsberger; J Sandkühler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  A pilot trial of intravenous pamidronate for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Marco Pappagallo; Brenda Breuer; Hung-Mo Lin; James B Moberly; Julia Tai; Christopher Noto; Angela Sanchez; Paolo L Manfredi
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Kyphoplasty increases vertebral height, decreases both pain score and opiate requirements while improving functional status.

Authors:  Reda Tolba; Robert B Bolash; Joshua Shroll; Shrif Costandi; Jarrod E Dalton; Chirag Sanghvi; Nagy Mekhail
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 10.  Intermittent bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis: progress to date.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Reginster; Olivier Malaise; Audrey Neuprez; Victor-Emmanuel Jouret; Pierre Close
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.