Literature DB >> 15589442

Tolerability of opioids in patients with acute pain due to nonmalignant musculoskeletal disease. A hospital-based observational study.

Anne Cherasse1, Géraldine Muller, Paul Ornetti, Christine Piroth, Christian Tavernier, Jean Francis Maillefert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of adverse effects of opioids used to treat acute nonmalignant musculoskeletal pain.
METHODS: Prospective, single-center, observational study in patients admitted to a rheumatology department for a nonmalignant painful musculoskeletal condition with onset within the last 3 months and a need for WHO Class III analgesics. The following side effects were recorded daily: nausea and vomiting, constipation, pruritus, urinary retention, drowsiness, confusion, and hallucinations.
RESULTS: The 75 study patients (46 women and 29 men with a mean age of 56.4 years) were admitted for nerve root pain, osteoporotic vertebral fracture, inflammatory joint disease, or other disorders. First-line treatment was sustained-release morphine sulfate in a mean starting dosage of 55.2 mg/day. The dosage was increased if needed (mean maximum dosage, 78.3 mg/day). Mean treatment duration was 8.9 days. Adverse effects were recorded in 73.3% of patients but were usually minor, requiring no change in the treatment regimen. Eight patients experienced serious adverse effects (confusion in five and urinary retention in three) that resolved with no change in treatment in two patients, after dosage reduction in two patients and after substitution of fentanyl or hydromorphone hydrochloride in four patients. Treatment discontinuation was not associated with adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Morphine is often responsible for adverse effects in patients with acute nonmalignant musculoskeletal pain. These effects are usually moderate and very rarely require discontinuation of the drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15589442     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  5 in total

1.  Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and American Society of Spine Radiology.

Authors:  M E Jensen; J K McGraw; J F Cardella; J A Hirsch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Intravenous pamidronate for pain relief in recent osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a randomized double-blind controlled study.

Authors:  T Armingeat; R Brondino; T Pham; V Legré; P Lafforgue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Non-surgical management of acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A review.

Authors:  Bhavuk Garg; Vivek Dixit; Sahil Batra; Rajesh Malhotra; Alok Sharan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-02-07

4.  Acupuncture in patients with a vertebral compression fracture: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Hyun-Jong Lee; Jung-Chul Seo; Sung-Hoon Park; Min-Ah Kwak; Im Hee Shin; Bo-Mi Min; Min-Su Cho; Woon-Seok Roh; Jin-Yong Jung
Journal:  J Pharmacopuncture       Date:  2015-03

5.  The Efficacy of Fentanyl Transdermal Patch as the First-Line Medicine for the Conservative Treatment of Osteoporotic Compression Fracture.

Authors:  June Ho Choi; Hui Dong Kang; Jin Hoon Park; Bon Sub Gu; Sang Ku Jung; Se Hyun Oh
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.