OBJECTIVE: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T has recently become available and potentially provides a significant improvement of tissue contrast in T1-weighted imaging techniques relying on Gd-based contrast enhancement. Imaging at high-field strength may be especially advantageous for methods relying on strong T1-weighting and imaging after contrast material administration. The aim of this study was to compare cardiac delayed enhancement (DE) MRI at 3.0 T and 1.5 T with respect to image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between infarcted and normal myocardium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with history of myocardial infarction were examined at 3.0 T (n = 20) or at 1.5 T (n = 20). Myocardial function was assessed using cine steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) sequences (TR 3.1 milliseconds, TE 1.6 milliseconds, flip angle 70 degrees , and a matrix of 168 x 256 at 1.5 T and TR 3.4 milliseconds, TE 1.7 milliseconds, flip angle 50 degrees and a matrix of 168 x 256 at 3.0 T), acquired in long- and short-axes views. DE images were obtained 15 minutes after the administration of 0.15 mmol of Gd-DTPA/kg body weight using a segmented inversion recovery prepared gradient echo sequence at 1.5 T (TR 9.6 milliseconds, TE 4.4 milliseconds, flip angle 25 degrees , matrix 160 x 256, bandwidth 140 Hertz/pixel) and at 3.0 T (TR 9.8 milliseconds, TE 4.3 milliseconds, flip angle 30 degrees , matrix 150 x 256, bandwidth 140 Hertz/pixel). For image analysis, standardized SNR and CNR measurements were performed in infarcted and remote myocardial regions. Two independent observers rated image quality on a 4-point scale (0 = poor image quality, 1 = sufficient image quality, 2 = good image quality, 3 = excellent image quality). RESULTS: High diagnostic image quality was obtained in all patients. Rating of mean image quality was 2.2 +/- 0.8 at 1.5 T and 2.5 +/- 0.6 at 3.0 T (P = 0.012) for observer 1 and 2.2 +/- 0.7 at 1.5 T and 2.6 +/- 0.6 at 3.0 T (P = 0.003) for observer 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.68 at 1.5 T and 0.78 at 3.0 T). SNR measurements yielded a mean SNR of 37.8 +/- 13.9/22.9 +/- 6.0 in infarcted myocardium (P < 0.001) and 5.6 +/- 2.2/5.9 +/- 2.4 in normal myocardium (P = 0.45) at 3.0 T/1.5 T, respectively. CNR measurements revealed mean values of 32.4 +/- 13.0/16.7 +/- 5.4 (P< 0.001) at 3.0 T/1.5 T, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed enhancement MRI at 3.0 T is feasible and provides superior image quality compared with 1.5 T. Furthermore, using identical contrast doses, increased SNR and CNR values were recorded at 3.0 T.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T has recently become available and potentially provides a significant improvement of tissue contrast in T1-weighted imaging techniques relying on Gd-based contrast enhancement. Imaging at high-field strength may be especially advantageous for methods relying on strong T1-weighting and imaging after contrast material administration. The aim of this study was to compare cardiac delayed enhancement (DE) MRI at 3.0 T and 1.5 T with respect to image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between infarcted and normal myocardium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with history of myocardial infarction were examined at 3.0 T (n = 20) or at 1.5 T (n = 20). Myocardial function was assessed using cine steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) sequences (TR 3.1 milliseconds, TE 1.6 milliseconds, flip angle 70 degrees , and a matrix of 168 x 256 at 1.5 T and TR 3.4 milliseconds, TE 1.7 milliseconds, flip angle 50 degrees and a matrix of 168 x 256 at 3.0 T), acquired in long- and short-axes views. DE images were obtained 15 minutes after the administration of 0.15 mmol of Gd-DTPA/kg body weight using a segmented inversion recovery prepared gradient echo sequence at 1.5 T (TR 9.6 milliseconds, TE 4.4 milliseconds, flip angle 25 degrees , matrix 160 x 256, bandwidth 140 Hertz/pixel) and at 3.0 T (TR 9.8 milliseconds, TE 4.3 milliseconds, flip angle 30 degrees , matrix 150 x 256, bandwidth 140 Hertz/pixel). For image analysis, standardized SNR and CNR measurements were performed in infarcted and remote myocardial regions. Two independent observers rated image quality on a 4-point scale (0 = poor image quality, 1 = sufficient image quality, 2 = good image quality, 3 = excellent image quality). RESULTS: High diagnostic image quality was obtained in all patients. Rating of mean image quality was 2.2 +/- 0.8 at 1.5 T and 2.5 +/- 0.6 at 3.0 T (P = 0.012) for observer 1 and 2.2 +/- 0.7 at 1.5 T and 2.6 +/- 0.6 at 3.0 T (P = 0.003) for observer 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.68 at 1.5 T and 0.78 at 3.0 T). SNR measurements yielded a mean SNR of 37.8 +/- 13.9/22.9 +/- 6.0 in infarcted myocardium (P < 0.001) and 5.6 +/- 2.2/5.9 +/- 2.4 in normal myocardium (P = 0.45) at 3.0 T/1.5 T, respectively. CNR measurements revealed mean values of 32.4 +/- 13.0/16.7 +/- 5.4 (P< 0.001) at 3.0 T/1.5 T, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed enhancement MRI at 3.0 T is feasible and provides superior image quality compared with 1.5 T. Furthermore, using identical contrast doses, increased SNR and CNR values were recorded at 3.0 T.
Authors: Jens Vogel-Claussen; Jan Skrok; Monda L Shehata; Sukhminder Singh; Christopher T Sibley; Danielle M Boyce; Noah Lechtzin; Reda E Girgis; Steven C Mathai; Thomas A Goldstein; Jie Zheng; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke; Paul M Hassoun Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Bernhard D Klumpp; Joern Sandstede; Klaus P Lodemann; Achim Seeger; Tobias Hoevelborn; Michael Fenchel; Ulrich Kramer; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Bernhard D Klumpp; Achim Seeger; Christina Doesch; Joerg Doering; Tobias Hoevelborn; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Meinrad P Gawaz; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Steve Kecskemeti; Kevin Johnson; Christopher J François; Mark L Schiebler; Orhan Unal Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 4.813