Literature DB >> 16895462

Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis.

Joachim Lange1, Karsten Georg, Markus Lappe.   

Abstract

Biological motion perception is referred to as the ability to recognize a moving human figure from no more than a few moving point lights. Such point-light stimuli contain limited form information about the shape of the body and local image motion signals from the moving points. The contributions of form and motion to the vivid perception of point-light displays are subject to controversy in the discussion. While some studies claim that local motion signals are critical, others emphasize the role of global form cues. Here, we present a template-matching approach to investigate the role of global form analysis. We used a template-matching method that derives biological motion exclusively from form information. The algorithm used static postures monitored from walking humans as stored templates. We compared the simulation results to psychophysical experiments with the commonly used point-light walker and a variant point-light walker with near-absent local motion signals. The common result in all experiments was a high correlation between simulation results and psychophysical data. The results show that the limited form information in point-light stimuli might be sufficient to perceive biological motion. We suggest that it is possible for humans to extract the sparse form information in point-light walkers and to use it to perceive biological motion by integrating dynamic form information over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16895462     DOI: 10.1167/6.8.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  21 in total

1.  Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration.

Authors:  Li Wang; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Does the Level of Graphical Detail of a Virtual Handball Thrower Influence a Goalkeeper's Motor Response?

Authors:  Nicolas Vignais; Benoit Bideau; Cathy Craig; Sébastien Brault; Franck Multon; Paul Delamarche; Richard Kulpa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Interactions between visual and motor areas during the recognition of plausible actions as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Anastasia Pavlidou; Alfons Schnitzler; Joachim Lange
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Action recognition by motion detection in posture space.

Authors:  Stefanie Theusner; Marc de Lussanet; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Lauren J Lorenzi; Geraint Rees; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  fMR-Adaptation Reveals Invariant Coding of Biological Motion on the Human STS.

Authors:  Emily D Grossman; Nicole L Jardine; John A Pyles
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The role of spatial and temporal information in biological motion perception.

Authors:  Joachim Lange; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

8.  Getting the gist of events: recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays.

Authors:  Alon Hafri; Anna Papafragou; John C Trueswell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-09-17

9.  Unaffected perceptual thresholds for biological and non-biological form-from-motion perception in autism spectrum conditions.

Authors:  Ayse Pinar Saygin; Jennifer Cook; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Normal form from biological motion despite impaired ventral stream function.

Authors:  S Gilaie-Dotan; S Bentin; M Harel; G Rees; A P Saygin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.