OBJECTIVES: To examine whether infertile couples (with a time to pregnancy of > 12 months), who conceive naturally or after treatment, give birth to children with an increased prevalence of congenital malformations. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Danish national birth cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Three groups of liveborn children and their mothers: 50,897 singletons and 1366 twins born of fertile couples (time to pregnancy < or = 12 months), 5764 singletons and 100 twins born of infertile couples who conceived naturally (time to pregnancy > 12 months), and 4588 singletons and 1690 twins born after infertility treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of congenital malformations determined from hospital discharge diagnoses. RESULTS: Compared with singletons born of fertile couples, singletons born of infertile couples who conceived naturally or after treatment had a higher prevalence of congenital malformations-hazard ratios 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.35) and 1.39 (1.23 to 1.57). The overall prevalence of congenital malformations increased with increasing time to pregnancy. When the analysis was restricted to singletons born of infertile couples, babies born after treatment had an increased prevalence of genital organ malformations (hazard ratio 2.32, 1.24 to 4.35) compared with babies conceived naturally. No significant differences existed in the overall prevalence of congenital malformations among twins. CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal treatment for infertility may be related to the occurrence of malformations of genital organs, but our results suggest that the reported increased prevalence of congenital malformations seen in singletons born after assisted reproductive technology is partly due to the underlying infertility or its determinants. The association between untreated infertility and congenital malformations warrants further examination.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether infertile couples (with a time to pregnancy of > 12 months), who conceive naturally or after treatment, give birth to children with an increased prevalence of congenital malformations. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Danish national birth cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Three groups of liveborn children and their mothers: 50,897 singletons and 1366 twins born of fertile couples (time to pregnancy < or = 12 months), 5764 singletons and 100 twins born of infertile couples who conceived naturally (time to pregnancy > 12 months), and 4588 singletons and 1690 twins born after infertility treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of congenital malformations determined from hospital discharge diagnoses. RESULTS: Compared with singletons born of fertile couples, singletons born of infertile couples who conceived naturally or after treatment had a higher prevalence of congenital malformations-hazard ratios 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.35) and 1.39 (1.23 to 1.57). The overall prevalence of congenital malformations increased with increasing time to pregnancy. When the analysis was restricted to singletons born of infertile couples, babies born after treatment had an increased prevalence of genital organ malformations (hazard ratio 2.32, 1.24 to 4.35) compared with babies conceived naturally. No significant differences existed in the overall prevalence of congenital malformations among twins. CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal treatment for infertility may be related to the occurrence of malformations of genital organs, but our results suggest that the reported increased prevalence of congenital malformations seen in singletons born after assisted reproductive technology is partly due to the underlying infertility or its determinants. The association between untreated infertility and congenital malformations warrants further examination.
Authors: Helle Larsen; Gunnar L Nielsen; Jørgen Bendsen; Carolin Flint; Jørn Olsen; Henrik T Sørensen Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2003 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Michèle Hansen; Carol Bower; Elizabeth Milne; Nicholas de Klerk; Jennifer J Kurinczuk Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2004-11-26 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: J Olsen; M Melbye; S F Olsen; T I Sørensen; P Aaby; A M Andersen; D Taxbøl; K D Hansen; M Juhl; T B Schow; H T Sørensen; J Andresen; E L Mortensen; A W Olesen; C Søndergaard Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Rebecca F Liberman; Kelly D Getz; Dominique Heinke; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Eugene R Declercq; Xiaoli Chen; Angela E Lin; Marlene Anderka Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: C Allen; S Bowdin; R F Harrison; A G Sutcliffe; L Brueton; G Kirby; J Kirkman-Brown; C Barrett; W Reardon; E Maher Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Michele Hansen; Elizabeth Milne; Nicholas de Klerk; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Peter Jacoby; Carol Bower Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 3.412