Literature DB >> 16893274

Discounting of past outcomes.

Richard Yi1, Kirstin M Gatchalian, Warren K Bickel.   

Abstract

Drug use, abuse, and addiction are common behavioral manifestations of impulsiveness. A useful and popular laboratory analogue of impulsiveness is temporal discounting. Temporal discounting refers to the reduction in the present, subjective value of outcomes that are temporally distant in the future. The extensive literature on temporal discounting indicates hyperbolic discounting, the magnitude effect, and the sign effect. It is possible that the same principles may apply to other dimensions of psychological distance, including past temporal distance. The purpose of the present study was to examine the possibility that outcomes in the past are discounted hyperbolically and at a similar rate to outcomes in the future. The magnitude and sign effects were also examined in past discounting. Indifference points of college students were determined from a paper-and-pencil questionnaire of future and past discounting. The results demonstrate that humans discount temporally distant past outcomes similarly to future outcomes. Discounting of the future and past are qualitatively and quantitatively similar; discounting of past outcomes is orderly, hyperbolic, and consistent with most empirical observations from studies of future discounting, including the magnitude and sign effects. The present study indicates that the discounting of past outcomes is a quantifiable phenomenon, and the results are similar to observations from the established future-discounting literature. Past discounting may be of use in the study of drug-dependent and other impulsive populations. Implications of a relationship between future and past discounting are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893274     DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.3.311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  22 in total

1.  A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention.

Authors:  Peter T Radu; Richard Yi; Warren K Bickel; James J Gross; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Altruism in time: social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers.

Authors:  W K Bickel; D P Jarmolowicz; E T Mueller; C T Franck; C Carrin; K M Gatchalian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Cigarette smokers discount past and future rewards symmetrically and more than controls: is discounting a measure of impulsivity?

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Benjamin P Kowal; Kirstin M Gatchalian
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Altering the magnitude of delay discounting by pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Mark R Dixon; Bethany Holton
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

5.  Restricted psychological horizon in active methamphetamine users: future, past, probability, and social discounting.

Authors:  Richard Yi; Anne E Carter; Reid D Landes
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Reid D Landes; Paul F Hill; Carole Baxter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Effects of delay and probability combinations on discounting in humans.

Authors:  David J Cox; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Temporal horizons of cigarette satiety: determining the window of time over which recent smoking influences motivation to smoke.

Authors:  Benjamin P Kowal; Warren K Bickel; Reid D Landes
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 9.  Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: fictive and real money gains and losses.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Jeffery A Pitcock; Richard Yi; Edgardo J C Angtuaco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.