Literature DB >> 16893262

Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Noriyuki Nakamura1, Kazuo Fujita, Tomokazu Ushitani, Hiromitsu Miyata.   

Abstract

The authors compared perception of the standard and reversed Müller-Lyer figures between pigeons (Columbia livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). In Experiment 1, pigeons learned to classify 6 lengths of target lines into "long" and "short" categories by pecking 2 keys on the monitor, ignoring the 2 brackets so placed that they would not induce an illusion. In the test that followed, all 3 birds chose the "long" key more frequently for the standard Müller-Lyer figures with inward-pointing brackets (><) than for the figures with outward-pointing brackets (<>). The subjects' responses were accountable by neither overall lengths of the figures nor horizontal gaps between the 2 brackets. For the reversed figures, effects of the brackets were absent. These results suggested that the pigeons perceived the standard Müller-Lyer illusion but not the reversed one. Experiment 2 confirmed that humans perceived both types of the illusion. Pigeons and humans may perceive the same illusory figures in different ways. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893262     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.3.252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Oana Tudusciuc; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

3.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

Review 4.  Determining whether a patient is feeling better: pitfalls from the science of human perception.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Victoria M Dickinson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive the Zöllner illusion?

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

6.  The brain creates illusions not just for us: sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) can "see the magic" as well.

Authors:  Theodora Fuss; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 7.  What can fish brains tell us about visual perception?

Authors:  Orsola Rosa Salva; Valeria Anna Sovrano; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in guppies.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 9.  The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  What can volumes reveal about human brain evolution? A framework for bridging behavioral, histometric, and volumetric perspectives.

Authors:  Alexandra A de Sousa; Michael J Proulx
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.