Literature DB >> 16892997

The effects of memory load on the time course of inhibition of return.

Raymond M Klein1, Alan D Castel, Jay Pratt.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to a processing disadvantage at a recently attended location. It is generally agreed that when elicited in a cue-target task, IOR will not be apparent until attention is disengaged from the originally cued location and returned to a neutral state. Here we test the hypothesis that when such disengagement is dependent on endogenous control, a secondary task that taxes working memory capacity should delay the appearance of IOR. Participants were given a six-item verbal working memory load prior to the peripheral cue in a cue-target detection task. Consistent with the hypothesis, the appearance of IOR was delayed on trials for which participants had to hold information in working memory. Converging evidence was derived from a second experiment in which the time course of IOR's appearance, when we added a central cue to exogenously remove attention from the peripheral cue, was unaffected by the memory load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16892997     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.

Authors:  S Danziger; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Volitional covert orienting to a peripheral cue does not suppress cue-induced inhibition of return.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; L Chelazzi; G Tassinari
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Attentional asymmetry in schizophrenia: disengagement and inhibition of return deficits.

Authors:  A Sapir; A Henik; M Dobrusin; E Y Hochman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: evidence from divided attention tasks.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Jay Pratt; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-08

5.  Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1999-10

6.  Covert visual orienting across the lifespan.

Authors:  D A Brodeur; J T Enns
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1997-03

7.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

8.  Inhibition of return and visuospatial attention in healthy older adults and individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  M E Faust; D A Balota
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Alison L Chasteen; Charles T Scialfa; Jay Pratt
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Abnormalities in rapid, automatic aspects of attention in schizophrenia: blunted inhibition of return.

Authors:  E D Huey; B E Wexler
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Re-examining the contribution of visuospatial working memory to inhibition of return.

Authors:  Ana B Vivas; Ioanna Liaromati; Elvira Masoura; Katerina Chatzikallia
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-01-21

2.  Active Listening Delays Attentional Disengagement and Saccadic Eye Movements.

Authors:  Benjamin D Lester; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

Review 3.  Reaction time variability in ADHD: a review.

Authors:  Leanne Tamm; Megan E Narad; Tanya N Antonini; Kathleen M O'Brien; Larry W Hawk; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Bilingualism modifies disengagement of attention networks across the scalp: A multivariate ERP investigation of the IOR paradigm.

Authors:  John G Grundy; Elena Pavlenko; Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.373

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.