Literature DB >> 10555867

Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information.

J Lupiáñez1, B Milliken.   

Abstract

Cuing a location with an uninformative cue leads to a facilitatory effect at that location shortly afterward and later (about 300 ms) to a negative effect called inhibition of return (IOR). Until recently, it was argued that IOR occurs in detection and localization tasks, but not in discrimination tasks. However, the authors of several recent studies have demonstrated IOR effects in discrimination tasks, although at a later cue-to-target stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). In this study, the authors examined why IOR occurs at a later SOA in discrimination tasks. In Experiments 1 and 2, different time courses of exogenous cuing effects in detection and discrimination tasks were established. In Experiment 3, the authors examined the role of an attentional set on the time course of exogenous cuing effects by manipulating the proportion of trials in which a distractor is presented in the location opposite the target. A new framework for understanding exogenous cuing effects and their dependence on endogenous attention is proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10555867     DOI: 10.1080/00221309909595373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1309


  24 in total

1.  Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.

Authors:  Bruce Milliken; Juan Lupiáñez; Martha Roberts; Biljana Stevanovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; María Ruz; María Jesús Funes; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-07

5.  Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities.

Authors:  Alexa B Roggeveen; David J Prime; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  How the brain blinks: towards a neurocognitive model of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Klaus Kessler; Frank Schmitz; Joachim Gross; Elkan Akyürek; Kimron Shapiro; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-20

7.  The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.

Authors:  María Jesús Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-06

8.  Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Stefanie Kehrer; Antje Kraft; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stefan P Koch; Herbert Hagendorf; Norbert Kathmann; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-03

Review 9.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  Impaired reflexive orienting to social cues in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Andrea Marotta; Maria Casagrande; Caterina Rosa; Lisa Maccari; Bianca Berloco; Augusto Pasini
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.785

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.