[Telemedicine and follow up of peritoneal dialysis patients].

UNLABELLED: Mean-term experience in the use of Telemedicine in Peritoneal Dialisis (PD) patients is limited as well as its cost-benefit. The main objective of this work is to evaluate Telemedicine utility in mean-long term control of stable PD patients, analyzing if the televisit (TV) could substitute 50% of the programed inhospital consults (HC) the time spent in both visit modalities, the quality of patient-personel contact as well as how image and sound have been perceived. Visit resolution was analyzed taking into account the need of HC after a TV; We also have studied if it would be possible to retrain patients in the dialisis technique with telemedicine, and we have checked the patient perceived quality and calculate the real and social costs.
METHODS: during 18 months, the system has been implanted to 19 patients with 7 +/- 4 follow up (range 3-17). A Falcon videoconference kit at patient's place was used, connected to the home television set. In the hospital there was a computer with a videoconference card, webcam and software meeting point which permits the control of patient's camera from the hospital. Both are connected by a 3RDSI line system. A monthly programmed HC or TV has been made. If more controls had been required, they have been made by TV Time spent was recorded on each TV and patients and staff questionary were inquired.
RESULTS: (a) PATIENTS: mean age 44 +/- 8 years, 13 (68%) male. 12 (63%) had elemental educational level and 7 (37%) mean-superior. 17 (89%) were actively working. The PD technique was: CAPD 6 (32%) and APD13 (68%). (b) Televisits: 103 TV have been made. 22 +/- 9 minutes were spent on each TV less than in the HC, 33 +/- 8 minutes (p < 0.01). There were technical problems related with lines in 21 TV, but only in 4 the connection was not possible. 92 TV (89%) were made on time, 99 (96%) had a good image quality and 96 (93%) had a correct sound. 100% of patients perceived TV as close to HC. In 90 TV (87%) medical treatment was modified. Only in 4 cases (3.9%) patients needed an hospital visit. According to patient's valuation, TV replaced correctly to HC in 97 instances (94%) and in 97 (97%) in staff opinion. In all cases (100%) catheter exit site could be evaluated as well as edema presence. Retraining was possible in all cases. There was a save in nurse's time and patient's time and also, a save in physical hospital space. Initial investment apart, the daily cost increment was scarce (1.5 Euro) taking into account that there is a save in time for patients and personnel, save in physical space in hospital and in sanitary transport.
CONCLUSION: Telemedicine is useful from the clinical point of view in the mean-term for stable patients in PD. Daily cost increment is scarce and there is a save in time for patients and personnel, save in physical space in hospital and in sanitary transport.