Literature DB >> 16892057

High-resolution imaging reveals highly selective nonface clusters in the fusiform face area.

Kalanit Grill-Spector1, Rory Sayres, David Ress.   

Abstract

A region in ventral human cortex (fusiform face area, FFA) thought to be important for face perception responds strongly to faces and less strongly to nonface objects. This pattern of response may reflect a uniform face-selective neural population or activity averaged across populations with heterogeneous selectivity. Using high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we found that the FFA has a reliable heterogeneous structure: localized subregions within the FFA highly selective to faces are spatially interdigitated with localized subregions highly selective to different object categories. We found a preponderance of face-selective responses in the FFA, but no difference in selectivity to faces compared to nonfaces. Thus, standard fMRI of the FFA reflects averaging of heterogeneous highly selective neural populations of differing sizes, rather than higher selectivity to faces. These results suggest that visual processing in this region is not exclusive to faces. Overall, our approach provides a framework for understanding the fine-scale structure of neural representations in the human brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16892057     DOI: 10.1038/nn1745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  61 in total

1.  Sparsely-distributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortex.

Authors:  Minna Ng; Vivian M Ciaramitaro; Stuart Anstis; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A brief thought can modulate activity in extrastriate visual areas: Top-down effects of refreshing just-seen visual stimuli.

Authors:  Matthew R Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; Carol L Raye; Mark D'Esposito; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Visual field and task influence illusory figure responses.

Authors:  Afiza Abu Bakar; Lichan Liu; Markus Conci; Mark A Elliott; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Developmental neuroimaging of the human ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Golijeh Golarai; John Gabrieli
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Johannes Haushofer; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Opposing influences of affective state valence on visual cortical encoding.

Authors:  Taylor W Schmitz; Eve De Rosa; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Defining the face processing network: optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; Giuseppe Iaria; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Functional subdomains within human FFA.

Authors:  Tolga Çukur; Alexander G Huth; Shinji Nishimoto; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Seeing Jesus in toast: neural and behavioral correlates of face pareidolia.

Authors:  Jiangang Liu; Jun Li; Lu Feng; Ling Li; Jie Tian; Kang Lee
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.