Literature DB >> 16892044

Cigarette smoking, von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations and sporadic renal cell carcinoma.

B A C van Dijk1, L J Schouten, E Oosterwijk, C A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, L A L M Kiemeney, R A Goldbohm, J A Schalken, P A van den Brandt.   

Abstract

We investigated whether smoking is associated with mutations in the Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene in 337 cases of sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) among 120 852 people followed for 11.3 years; the findings suggest that smoking causes RCC independently of VHL gene mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16892044      PMCID: PMC2360644          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Mutations in the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) tumour suppressor gene are a common, early event in sporadic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (Gnarra ; Richards ). Tobacco smoke is implicated in the aetiology of RCC, with dose-dependent increased risks for former (rate ratio RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.07–1.36) and current (RR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.26–1.66) smokers (Hunt ). Cigarette smoke metabolites have been shown to cause specific DNA mutations (Harris, 1991; Shiao ; Phillips, 2002), and are excreted in the urine (Hecht, 2002). Occupational exposure to trichloroethylene (Brauch , 2004) and consumption of citrus fruit and vegetables (confined to smokers) (Hemminki ) have been linked to VHL mutations in RCC. We have investigated whether cigarette smoking is associated with sporadic RCC and with mutations in the VHL gene in clear-cell RCC in a prospective cohort study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer (NLCS) included 120 852 men and women, aged 55–69 years, in 1986. The study was designed as a case–cohort study, using all cases and a random sample of 5000 persons from the cohort (subcohort) (Van den Brandt ). All participants who reported prevalent cancer (excluding skin cancer) at baseline were excluded from analyses (leaving 4774 subcohort members). The subcohort was followed to estimate the accumulated person-years in the entire cohort (Volovics and van den Brandt, 1997). Follow-up for incident cancer was established by computerised record linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and PALGA, a national database of pathology reports (Van den Brandt ), and was estimated to be more than 96% complete (Goldbohm ). From 1986 to 1997 (11.3 years follow-up), 355 kidney cancer cases (ICD-O-3: C64.9) were identified. Urothelial cell carcinomas were excluded and only histologically confirmed epithelial cancers were included (ICD-O: M8010–8119, 8140–8570), leaving 337 cases. The collection, classification, DNA isolation and mutation analyses have been described previously (van Houwelingen ). After revision and VHL mutation analyses, data were available for 235 cases. At baseline, all cohort members completed a mailed, self-administered questionnaire on dietary habits (food-frequency questionnaire), lifestyle, smoking, personal and family history of cancer and demographic data (Goldbohm ). Questions on cigarette smoking in the questionnaire addressed smoking status (never, ex- or current smoker), age at first and last exposure, frequency and duration. Information on smoking status was complete for 336 cases and 4762 subcohort members. Differences between cases with and without collected tumour material, between men and women and between cases with and without a mutation in the VHL gene were assessed by Student's t-tests and χ2 tests. RRs and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models processed with STATA (STATA statistical software, Release 7, STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA, 2001), after testing the proportional hazards assumption using scaled Schoenfeld residuals (Schoenfeld, 1982). Standard errors were estimated using the robust Huber–White sandwich estimator to account for additional variance introduced by sampling from the cohort (Lin and Wei, 1989). To obtain P-values for dose–response trends, ordinal exposure variables were fitted as continuous terms. Two-sided P-values are reported throughout this paper. RRs were calculated for never, ex- and current smokers for the total group and for men and women separately. The following case groups were defined: total RCC (all cases of RCC; N=337); clear-cell RCC (all cases of RCC classified as clear-cell by one experienced pathologist (CAHK); N=187); VHL-mutated clear-cell RCC (clear-cell RCC with a mutation in the VHL gene; N=114) and VHL wild-type clear-cell RCC (clear-cell RCC without a mutation in the VHL gene; N=73). Because G:C → T:A transversions and G:C → A:T transitions have been linked to specific tobacco smoke constituents (Harris, 1991; Shiao ), the association of smoking and these mutations was investigated. Confounders entered in the analyses were age, sex (if appropriate) and body mass index. Cigar and pipe smoking (never, ex- and current smoker) were additionally included in the model to account for other sources of tobacco smoke. To assess dose–response relations, the number of cigarettes smoked per day was categorised into <10, 10–20, 20–30 and 30 or more cigarettes per day (additionally adjusted for smoking years), and the number of smoking years was categorised into <20, 20–40 and 40 or more smoking years (additionally adjusted for cigarettes smoked per day). Age at first exposure (<15, 15–17, 17–20 and 20 or older) and years of cessation (<5, 5–20 or more than 20 years) were also investigated, with additional adjustment for cigarettes smoked per day.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences between cases with (N=235) or without (N=102) tumour tissue. The mean age was somewhat higher for cases than for subcohort members (Table 1). There were almost no male never smokers, whereas female smokers were scarce.
Table 1

Description of possible confounding variables and smoking variables for men and women, Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer, 1986–1997

  Men
Women
Variable Subcohort, N=2331 RCC cases, N=217 RCC, tumour tissue, collected N=148 Subcohort, N=2431 RCC cases, N=119 RCC, tumour tissue, collected N=87
Age, mean (s.d.)61.4 (4.2)62.0 (3.8)62.2 (3.8)61.5 (4.3)61.8 (4.0)61.6 (4.0)
       
Family history of RCC
 Yes, N (%)14 (0.6)3 (1.4)2 (1.4)33 (1.4)1 (0.8)1 (1.2)
       
History of hypertension
 Yes, N (%)534 (22.9)56 (25.8)37 (25.0)700 (28.8)41 (34.5)31 (35.6)
       
BMI, mean (s.d.)25.0 (2.6)25.3 (2.7)25.4 (2.6)25.1 (3.6)25.8 (3.4)25.7 (3.2)
 (N=2247)(N=210)(N=141)(N=2341)(N=113)(N=82)
Cigarette smoking
 Never, N (%)300 (12.9)18 (8.3)12 (8.1)1431 (58.9)66 (55.5)49 (56.3)
 Ex, N (%)1175 (50.4)108 (49.8)79 (53.4)491 (20.2)21 (17.6)15 (17.2)
 Current, N (%)856 (36.7)91 (41.9)57 (38.5)509 (20.9)32 (26.9)23 (26.4)
       
Never smoker
 Yes N (%)217 (9.3)11 (5.1)6 (4.1)1431 (58.9)64 (53.8)48 (55.2)
       
Cigarette only smoker
 Yes, N (%)1413 (60.6)136 (62.7)86 (58.1)995 (40.9)53 (44.5)38 (43.7)
       
Cigar and/or pipe smoker
 Yes, N (%)83 (3.6)7 (3.2)6 (4.1)02 (1.7)1 (1.2)
       
Cigarette and other type of tobacco smoker
 Yes, N (%)618 (26.5)63 (29.0)50 (33.8)5 (0.2)00

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; s.d., standard deviation.

Table 2 shows multivariable adjusted analyses for smoking for the earlier described case groups. Statistically significantly increased RRs were observed for men only (Table 2). The RRs were higher for VHL wild-type clear-cell tumours than for mutated clear-cell tumours. This was observed both in men and women.
Table 2

Rate ratios for ex- and current smokers compared to never smokers for all tumours (total), clear-cell tumours, clear-cell tumours with a VHL gene mutation and VHL wild-type clear-cell cases, Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer (1986–1997)

  Never smokers
Ex-smokers
Current smokers
 
  Cases (N) Person-years subcohort RRa Cases (N) Person-years subcohort RR (95% CI) Cases (N) Person-years subcohort RR (95% CI) P-value for interactionb
Men and women c
 Total8117 906112516 7591.17 (0.85–1.61)11713 3771.60 (1.17–2.20)0.43
 Clear-cell4817 90617316 7591.34 (0.91–1.99)5713 3771.49 (0.98–2.26)0.20
 Clear-cell wild-type1817 90612716 7591.58 (0.84–2.94)2613 3772.06 (1.07–3.94)0.55
 Clear-cell mutated3017 90614616 7591.20 (0.73–1.96)3113 3771.17 (0.69–1.99)0.24
           
Men d
 Total173086110511 6431.52 (0.89–2.59)8881762.07 (1.20–3.56) 
 Clear-cell6308616011 6432.43 (1.07–5.56)3981762.54 (1.05–6.17) 
 Clear-cell wild-type2308612111 6432.68 (0.66–10.86)1581762.95 (0.65–13.28) 
 Clear-cell mutated4308613911 6432.33 (0.84–6.44)2481762.34 (0.79–6.94) 
           
Women e
 Total6414 82012051160.95 (0.57–1.59)2952011.37 (0.87–2.16) 
 Clear-cell4214 82011351160.94 (0.50–1.76)1852011.29 (0.73–2.28) 
 Clear-cell wild-type1614 8201651161.12 (0.44–2.86)1152012.04 (0.94–4.45) 
 Clear-cell mutated2614 8201751160.82 (0.35–1.92)752010.82 (0.35–1.93) 

Abbreviations: RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RR, rate ratio; s.d., standard deviation; VHL, Von Hippel–Lindau.

Reference group.

Test for interaction of sex and smoking.

Cigarette, cigar and pipe smoking, multivariable adjusted for age, sex and BMI.

Cigarette, cigar and pipe smoking, multivariable adjusted for age and BMI.

Cigarette smoking, multivariable adjusted for age and BMI.

Dose–response effects were indicated (increasing risk with increasing smoking frequency and a lower risk of RCC after cessation without a clear trend). There were no noteworthy differences between mutated and wild-type clear-cell RCC. This was investigated in ever-smoking men only, as the number of women was too low for meaningful analyses (van Dijk ). The distribution of smokers for the different type of mutations, the mutational spectra, specific mutations (i.e. G:C → T:A transversions and G:C → A:T transitions) and location of mutations was not different for never, ex- and current smokers (van Dijk ).

DISCUSSION

Our results indicate that smoking was associated with increased risk of RCC, but that the number of mutations in the VHL gene was not increased by smoking. The percentage of smokers in this cohort appears to be slightly lower compared to the percentage in the population, which may either be the result of a selective response by smoking status to the baseline questionnaire or of under-reporting of smoking habits because of social desirability. The response rate to the questionnaire at baseline equalled 35.5% (Van den Brandt ), with a slight shift towards nonsmoking compared to the population (Goldbohm ). This selective response would not lead to altered RRs, whereas under-reporting would result in an underestimation of the RRs. Latency of RCC is unknown, but a latency of decades seems plausible. Most of the ever smokers in the subcohort had smoked for 20 years or more (86.0% of men and 75.5% of women), whereas 42.2% of men and 23.7% of women had smoked for 40 years or more. Also, 77.0% of men and 36.7% of women started smoking before the age of 19. These percentages are sufficiently high to assume that smoking could have caused cancer within the time frame measured by this study. We hypothesised smoking to be associated with VHL mutations. Contrary to what we expected, RRs were somewhat higher for VHL wild-type tumours than for VHL-mutated tumours. No association of smoking and specific types of mutations was found. The observation that exposure to BPDE (a smoke constituent) induces G:C → T:A transversions has predominantly been reported for the p53 tumour suppressor gene in lung cancer (Hussain ) and may not apply to all genes and cancer sites, for example, not one p53 G:C → T:A transversion was observed in smokers in a study on bladder cancer (Spruck ). Exposure to N-nitrosamino compounds was associated with G : C → A : T transitions in the RAS gene in tumours of rodents (Harris, 1991) and also with VHL mutations in rats (Shiao ). We found no evidence to suggest that this plays a role in humans. We are among the first to investigate the association of risk factors with VHL mutations. A direct association between a risk factor and mutations may give additional information on the pathway(s) that lead to tumour growth. Previously, a positive association of occupational exposure to trichloroethylene, an industrial solvent, to VHL mutations and a hot spot for mutations was observed in a case–control study (Brauch , 2004). However, long-term exposure to an extremely high dose of the probable carcinogen trichloroethylene was investigated. Decreased risks were observed for vegetable consumption (for smokers) and citrus consumption (for smokers and nonsmokers together) and mutations in a case-only study (Hemminki ). In this report, the OR for risk of VHL mutations compared to wild-type VHL as a result of smoking equalled 0.95 (95% CI: 0.41–2.21) (Hemminki ). This supports our observation that smoking may not be associated with VHL mutations. Smoking was associated with RCC risk for men, but smoking was not associated with VHL mutations, irrespective of sex, implying that smoking may cause or promote RCC independent from VHL mutations.
  17 in total

1.  A large-scale prospective cohort study on diet and cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  P A van den Brandt; R A Goldbohm; P van 't Veer; A Volovics; R J Hermus; F Sturmans
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Molecular cloning of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene and its role in renal carcinoma.

Authors:  J R Gnarra; D R Duan; Y Weng; J S Humphrey; D Y Chen; S Lee; A Pause; C F Dudley; F Latif; I Kuzmin; L Schmidt; F M Duh; T Stackhouse; F Chen; T Kishida; M H Wei; M I Lerman; B Zbar; R D Klausner; W M Linehan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1996-03-18

3.  Mutability of p53 hotspot codons to benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE) and the frequency of p53 mutations in nontumorous human lung.

Authors:  S P Hussain; P Amstad; K Raja; M Sawyer; L Hofseth; P G Shields; A Hewer; D H Phillips; D Ryberg; A Haugen; C C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Molecular epidemiology of VHL gene mutations in renal cell carcinoma patients: relation to dietary and other factors.

Authors:  Kari Hemminki; Yongwen Jiang; Xin Ma; Ke Yang; Lars Egevad; Per Lindblad
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Renal cell carcinoma in relation to cigarette smoking: meta-analysis of 24 studies.

Authors:  Jay D Hunt; Olga L van der Hel; Garnett P McMillan; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Validation of a dietary questionnaire used in a large-scale prospective cohort study on diet and cancer.

Authors:  R A Goldbohm; P A van den Brandt; H A Brants; P van't Veer; M Al; F Sturmans; R J Hermus
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 7.  Molecular genetic analysis of von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  F M Richards; A R Webster; R McMahon; E R Woodward; S Rose; E R Maher
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  VHL mutations in renal cell cancer: does occupational exposure to trichloroethylene make a difference?

Authors:  Hiltrud Brauch; Gregor Weirich; Bettina Klein; Sylvia Rabstein; Hermann M Bolt; Thomas Brüning
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 4.372

9.  Prevalence of von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations in sporadic renal cell carcinoma: results from The Netherlands cohort study.

Authors:  Kjeld P van Houwelingen; Boukje A C van Dijk; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Leo J Schouten; Hanneke J M Gorissen; Jack A Schalken; Piet A van den Brandt; Egbert Oosterwijk
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Cigarette smoking, von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations and sporadic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  B A C van Dijk; L J Schouten; E Oosterwijk; C A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; L A L M Kiemeney; R A Goldbohm; J A Schalken; P A van den Brandt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  2'-hydroxyflavanone inhibits proliferation, tumor vascularization and promotes normal differentiation in VHL-mutant renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lokesh Dalasanur Nagaprashantha; Rit Vatsyayan; Jyotsana Singhal; Poorna Lelsani; Laszlo Prokai; Sanjay Awasthi; Sharad S Singhal
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Coffee intake and trace element blood concentrations in association with renal cell cancer among smokers.

Authors:  Hongke Wu; Stephanie Weinstein; Lee E Moore; Demetrius Albanes; Robin Taylor Wilson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Polymorphisms in genes related to activation or detoxification of carcinogens might interact with smoking to increase renal cancer risk: results from The Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer.

Authors:  Kim M Smits; Leo J Schouten; Boukje A C van Dijk; Kjeld van Houwelingen; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Egbert Oosterwijk; Piet A van den Brandt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  BPDE induced lymphocytic chromosome 3p deletions may predict renal cell carcinoma risk.

Authors:  Yimin Zhu; Yohei Horikawa; Hushan Yang; Christopher G Wood; Tomonori Habuchi; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Contemporary epidemiology of renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Wong-Ho Chow; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Prognostic significance of Gremlin1 (GREM1) promoter CpG island hypermethylation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Iris J H van Vlodrop; Marcella M L Baldewijns; Kim M Smits; Leo J Schouten; Leander van Neste; Wim van Criekinge; Hein van Poppel; Evelyne Lerut; Kornel E Schuebel; Nita Ahuja; James G Herman; Adriaan P de Bruïne; Manon van Engeland
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) inactivation in sporadic clear cell renal cancer: associations with germline VHL polymorphisms and etiologic risk factors.

Authors:  Lee E Moore; Michael L Nickerson; Paul Brennan; Jorge R Toro; Erich Jaeger; Jessica Rinsky; Summer S Han; David Zaridze; Vsevolod Matveev; Vladimir Janout; Hellena Kollarova; Vladimir Bencko; Marie Navratilova; Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Dana Mates; Laura S Schmidt; Petra Lenz; Sara Karami; W Marston Linehan; Maria Merino; Stephen Chanock; Paolo Boffetta; Wong-Ho Chow; Frederic M Waldman; Nathaniel Rothman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Cigarette smoking, von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations and sporadic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  B A C van Dijk; L J Schouten; E Oosterwijk; C A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; L A L M Kiemeney; R A Goldbohm; J A Schalken; P A van den Brandt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Genomic investigation of etiologic heterogeneity: methodologic challenges.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Venkatraman E Seshan; Emily C Zabor; Helena Furberg; Arshi Arora; Ronglai Shen; Jodi K Maranchie; Matthew E Nielsen; W Kimryn Rathmell; Sabina Signoretti; Pheroze Tamboli; Jose A Karam; Toni K Choueiri; A Ari Hakimi; James J Hsieh
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.