INTRODUCTION: The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was constructed in Sweden; this questionnaire has proved to be valid for persons with hip disability with or without hip osteoarthritis (OA) and with high demands of physical function. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency, reliability, construct validity, and floor and ceiling effects of the Dutch version of the HOOS questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After translation with a forward/backward protocol, 74 hip arthroplasty patients and 88 hip OA patients filled in the Dutch HOOS, as well as a Short Form-36 (SF-36), an Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and a VAS-pain questionnaire. RESULTS: The Dutch version of the HOOS questionnaire achieved excellent scores in all of the clinimetric properties. CONCLUSION: The Dutch HOOS questionnaire has a good internal consistency and reliability. Moreover, the construct validity is good and no floor and ceiling effects were found. The HOOS is a good instrument for patients with different stadia of hip OA.
INTRODUCTION: The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was constructed in Sweden; this questionnaire has proved to be valid for persons with hip disability with or without hip osteoarthritis (OA) and with high demands of physical function. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency, reliability, construct validity, and floor and ceiling effects of the Dutch version of the HOOS questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After translation with a forward/backward protocol, 74 hip arthroplastypatients and 88 hip OA patients filled in the Dutch HOOS, as well as a Short Form-36 (SF-36), an Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and a VAS-pain questionnaire. RESULTS: The Dutch version of the HOOS questionnaire achieved excellent scores in all of the clinimetric properties. CONCLUSION: The Dutch HOOS questionnaire has a good internal consistency and reliability. Moreover, the construct validity is good and no floor and ceiling effects were found. The HOOS is a good instrument for patients with different stadia of hip OA.
Authors: Rudolf W Poolman; Marc F Swiontkowski; Jeremy C T Fairbank; Emil H Schemitsch; Sheila Sprague; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Jennifer M T A Meessen; Marta Fiocco; Rutger L Tordoir; Arnout Sjer; Suzan H M Verdegaal; P Eline Slagboom; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Rob G H H Nelissen Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Thomas H Nijman; Vanessa A Scholtes; Frank R A J de Meulemeester; Cor P van der Hart; Rudolf W Poolman Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2012-02-04
Authors: I N Sierevelt; L Beimers; C J A van Bergen; D Haverkamp; C B Terwee; G M M J Kerkhoffs Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Veronique M A Voorn; Henricus M Vermeulen; Rob G H H Nelissen; Margreet Kloppenburg; Tom W J Huizinga; Nicolette A C Leijerzapf; Herman M Kroon; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Henrica M J van der Linden Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Franco M Impellizzeri; Mario Bizzini; Michael Leunig; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Anne F Mannion Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: C S Leichtenberg; C Tilbury; Ppfm Kuijer; Shm Verdegaal; R Wolterbeek; Rghh Nelissen; Mhw Frings-Dresen; Tpm Vliet Vlieland Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 1.891