Literature DB >> 16889793

Metrics that differentiate the origins of osmolyte effects on protein stability: a test of the surface tension proposal.

Matthew Auton1, Allan Chris M Ferreon, D Wayne Bolen.   

Abstract

Osmolytes that are naturally selected to protect organisms against environmental stresses are known to confer stability to proteins via preferential exclusion from protein surfaces. Solvophobicity, surface tension, excluded volume, water structure changes and electrostatic repulsion are all examples of forces proposed to account for preferential exclusion and the ramifications exclusion has on protein properties. What has been lacking is a systematic way of determining which force(s) is(are) responsible for osmolyte effects. Here, we propose the use of two experimental metrics for assessing the abilities of various proposed forces to account for osmolyte-mediated effects on protein properties. Metric 1 requires prediction of the experimentally determined ability of the osmolyte to bring about folding/unfolding resulting from the application of the force in question (i.e. prediction of the m-value of the protein in osmolyte). Metric 2 requires prediction of the experimentally determined ability of the osmolyte to contract or expand the Stokes radius of the denatured state resulting from the application of the force. These metrics are applied to test separate claims that solvophobicity/solvophilicity and surface tension are driving forces for osmolyte-induced effects on protein stability. The results show clearly that solvophobic/solvophilic forces readily account for protein stability and denatured state dimensional effects, while surface tension alone fails to do so. The agreement between experimental and predicted m-values involves both positive and negative m-values for three different proteins, and as many as six different osmolytes, illustrating that the tests are robust and discriminating. The ability of the two metrics to distinguish which forces account for the effects of osmolytes on protein properties and which do not, provides a powerful means of investigating the origins of osmolyte-protein effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16889793     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  19 in total

1.  From the test tube to the cell: exploring the folding and aggregation of a beta-clam protein.

Authors:  Zoya Ignatova; Beena Krishnan; Jeffrey P Bombardier; Anna Marie C Marcelino; Jiang Hong; Lila M Gierasch
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.505

2.  Urea orientation at protein surfaces.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Laura B Sagle; Paul S Cremer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Osmolyte perturbation reveals conformational equilibria in spin-labeled proteins.

Authors:  Carlos J López; Mark R Fleissner; Zhefeng Guo; Ana K Kusnetzow; Wayne L Hubbell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Molten globule and native state ensemble of Helicobacter pylori flavodoxin: can crowding, osmolytes or cofactors stabilize the native conformation relative to the molten globule?

Authors:  N Cremades; J Sancho
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  How osmolytes influence hydrophobic polymer conformations: A unified view from experiment and theory.

Authors:  Jagannath Mondal; Duncan Halverson; Isaac T S Li; Guillaume Stirnemann; Gilbert C Walker; Bruce J Berne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effect of osmolytes on the binding of EGR1 transcription factor to DNA.

Authors:  David C Mikles; Vikas Bhat; Brett J Schuchardt; Caleb B McDonald; Amjad Farooq
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Glycosylation sterically inhibits platelet adhesion to von Willebrand factor without altering intrinsic conformational dynamics.

Authors:  Alexander Tischer; Venkata R Machha; Laurie Moon-Tasson; Linda M Benson; Matthew Auton
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  Counteracting chemical chaperone effects on the single-molecule α-synuclein structural landscape.

Authors:  Allan Chris M Ferreon; Mahdi Muhammad Moosa; Yann Gambin; Ashok A Deniz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Stabilization of the predominant disease-causing aldolase variant (A149P) with zwitterionic osmolytes.

Authors:  Jack D Stopa; Sushil Chandani; Dean R Tolan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Sorbitol counteracts temperature- and chemical-induced denaturation of a recombinant α-amylase from alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. TS-23.

Authors:  Meng-Chun Chi; Tai-Jung Wu; Hsing-Ling Chen; Huei-Fen Lo; Long-Liu Lin
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 3.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.