Eric E Noreen1, Peter W R Lemon. 1. Department of Health Sciences, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA 17325, USA. enoreen@gettysburg.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Several studies have assessed the validity of air displacement plethysmography (ADP), but few have assessed the reliability of ADP using a large, heterogeneous sample. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the reliability of ADP using the Bod Pod in a large, heterogeneous sample. METHODS: A total of 980 healthy men and women (30 +/- 15 yr, mean +/- SD) completed two body composition assessments separated by 15-30 min. All testing was done in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: A significant correlation (r = 0.992, P = 0.001) was found between body density (BD) 1 (1.046 +/- 0.001 kg.L(-1); mean +/- SEM) and BD 2 (1.046 +/- 0.001 kg.L(-1). A paired t-test revealed no significant difference between BD 1 and 2 (P = 0.935). The coefficient of variation (CV) for BD was 0.15%. A significant intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was found for BD (ICC = 0.996, P = 0.001), and the standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.001 kg.L(-1). Body mass (BM) 1 and 2 were correlated significantly (r = 0.999, P = 0.001); however, a significant (P = 0.001) decrease was seen from BM 1 (75.510 +/- 0.461 kg) to BM 2 (75.497 +/- 0.461 kg). Body volume (BV) tended to decrease (P = 0.08) from BV 1 (69.900 +/- 0.449 L) to BV 2 (69.884 +/- 0.449 L). CONCLUSION: ADP using the Bod Pod appears to assess BD reliably; however, the observed CV suggests that multiple trials are necessary to detect small treatment effects.
INTRODUCTION: Several studies have assessed the validity of air displacement plethysmography (ADP), but few have assessed the reliability of ADP using a large, heterogeneous sample. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the reliability of ADP using the Bod Pod in a large, heterogeneous sample. METHODS: A total of 980 healthy men and women (30 +/- 15 yr, mean +/- SD) completed two body composition assessments separated by 15-30 min. All testing was done in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: A significant correlation (r = 0.992, P = 0.001) was found between body density (BD) 1 (1.046 +/- 0.001 kg.L(-1); mean +/- SEM) and BD 2 (1.046 +/- 0.001 kg.L(-1). A paired t-test revealed no significant difference between BD 1 and 2 (P = 0.935). The coefficient of variation (CV) for BD was 0.15%. A significant intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was found for BD (ICC = 0.996, P = 0.001), and the standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.001 kg.L(-1). Body mass (BM) 1 and 2 were correlated significantly (r = 0.999, P = 0.001); however, a significant (P = 0.001) decrease was seen from BM 1 (75.510 +/- 0.461 kg) to BM 2 (75.497 +/- 0.461 kg). Body volume (BV) tended to decrease (P = 0.08) from BV 1 (69.900 +/- 0.449 L) to BV 2 (69.884 +/- 0.449 L). CONCLUSION:ADP using the Bod Pod appears to assess BD reliably; however, the observed CV suggests that multiple trials are necessary to detect small treatment effects.
Authors: Gena R Gerstner; Eric D Ryan; Craig R Kleinberg; Andrew J Tweedell; Abbie E Smith-Ryan Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Hailee L Wingfield; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Mary N Woessner; Malia N Melvin; Sarah N Fultz; Rachel M Graff Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Rozanne Kruger; Sarah P Shultz; Sarah A McNaughton; Aaron P Russell; Ridvan T Firestone; Lily George; Kathryn L Beck; Cathryn A Conlon; Pamela R von Hurst; Bernhard Breier; Shakeela N Jayasinghe; Wendy J O'Brien; Beatrix Jones; Welma Stonehouse Journal: Springerplus Date: 2015-03-14