Literature DB >> 16887011

Measuring extravascular lung water: animals and humans are not the same.

Mikhail Y Kirov, Vsevolod V Kuzkov, Enrique Fernandez-Mondejar, Lars J Bjertnaes.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16887011      PMCID: PMC1750985          DOI: 10.1186/cc4989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

The evolution of extravascular lung water (EVLW) monitoring is an important step forward in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients. The determination of EVLW with single transpulmonary thermodilution (STD) has shown an acceptable accuracy and reproducibility [1-4]. However, in the experimental setting the STD technique can overestimate EVLW compared with postmortem gravimetry as a reference method [1-3]. The calculation of EVLW is based on the assumption that EVLW = intrathoracic thermal volume (ITTV) – intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV). According to the STD algorithm (PiCCO; Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany), in humans ITBV = 1.25 × global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) – 28.4 (ml) [4]. However, in experimental studies the relationship between ITBV and GEDV differs significantly. It is still unsettled whether this depends on species differences or different body weights. In pigs weighing between 24.0 and 31.8 kg, the linear regression equation is ITBV = 1.52 × GEDV – 49.7 [1]. Replacing the default PiCCO algorithm by the latter equation, the overestimation was reduced to a level that was not significantly different from the gravimetric value. Employing a thermal dye technique (TDD, Cold Z-021; Pulsion Medical Systems), we recently determined ITBV, GEDV, the ITBV:GEDV ratio, and pulmonary blood volume (PBV) in sheep. The measurements were performed during spontaneous breathing, during mechanical ventilation, and after pneumonectomy (Table 1). Our results confirm the close correlation between ITBV and GEDV in different states. They may also indicate a relationship between ventilation, perfusion and the ITBV/GEDV ratio [4]. Mechanical ventilation can decrease preloading, thus reducing GEDV, whereas ITBV continues to remain an accurate marker of preload. Most probably, ITBV reduces after pneumonectomy because of a decrease in PBV. We therefore suggest that the ITBV:GEDV ratio depends on relative and independent changes in ITBV and GEDV.
Table 1

Volumetric variables in sheep breathing spontaneously, or subjected to mechanical ventilation, or pneumonectomy

ParameterSB (n = 48)MV (n = 51)PE (n = 42)
ITBVI (ml/m2)856 ± 106804 ± 129635 ± 116b,c
GEDVI (ml/m2)654 ± 92551 ± 91b461 ± 97b,c
PBVI (ml/m2)202 ± 32253 ± 56b176 ± 41b,c
ITBV:GEDV ratio1.313 ± 0.0631.463 ± 0.089b1.389 ± 0.101b,c
Correlation between ITBVI and GEDVa0.960.930.95
Regression equationITBVI = 1.16 × GEDVI + 92.45ITBVI = 1.43 × GEDVI + 13.48ITBVI = 1.21 × GEDVI + 73.72

SB, spontaneous breathing; MV, mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 6 to 8 ml/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure 2 cmH2O; PE, pneumonectomy; ITBVI, intrathoracic blood volume index; GEDVI, global end-diastolic volume index; PBVI, pulmonary blood volume index; ITBV, intrathoracic blood volume; GEDV, global end-diastolic volume. All data are distributed normally and are presented as means ± SD. aPearson coefficient, r (p < 0.0001). bp < 0.05 compared with SB; cp < 0.05 compared with MV (analysis of variance followed by Scheffe's test).

We agree with other investigators [1,2] that STD may be a useful tool for monitoring changes in EVLW over time. Our recent study [5] demonstrates that in patients with severe sepsis EVLW measured by STD has a prognostic role and is significantly correlated with lung injury score. Although we have to keep in mind the technical aspects of STD that can differ between experimental and clinical settings, EVLW has evolved as a key variable for evaluating pulmonary hemodynamics. Thus, monitoring of EVLW might be a valid dynamic measure of lung edema at the bedside, supporting therapeutical decisions on patients with a compromised cardiopulmonary function.

Key messages

• The calculation of extravascular lung water with the use of single transpulmonary thermodilution in the experimental animals requires a specific correction. • The monitoring of extravascular lung water is a valid dynamic method for measuring lung edema at the bedside.

Abbreviations

EVLW = extravascular lung water; GEDV = global end-diastolic volume; ITBV = intrathoracic blood volume; PBV = pulmonary blood volume; STD = single transpulmonary thermodilution.

Competing interests

MYK and EF-M are members of the Medical Advisory Board, Pulsion Medical Systems. Approximately 25% of the total expenses to two of the studies upon which this letter is based has been reimbursed by Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany.

Authors' contributions

MYK and VVK participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. EF-M and LJB participated in the preparation of the draft. All authors read and approved the final version.
  5 in total

1.  Extravascular lung water determined with single transpulmonary thermodilution correlates with the severity of sepsis-induced acute lung injury.

Authors:  Vsevolod V Kuzkov; Mikhail Y Kirov; Mikhail A Sovershaev; Vladimir N Kuklin; Evgeny V Suborov; Kristine Waerhaug; Lars J Bjertnaes
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Comparison of a single indicator and gravimetric technique for estimation of extravascular lung water in endotoxemic pigs.

Authors:  Patrik Rossi; Michael Wanecek; Anders Rudehill; David Konrad; Eddie Weitzberg; Anders Oldner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution.

Authors:  S G Sakka; C C Rühl; U J Pfeiffer; R Beale; A McLuckie; K Reinhart; A Meier-Hellmann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Accuracy of transpulmonary thermodilution versus gravimetric measurement of extravascular lung water.

Authors:  Rita Katzenelson; Azriel Perel; Haiim Berkenstadt; Sergei Preisman; Samuel Kogan; Leonid Sternik; Eran Segal
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Extravascular lung water assessed by transpulmonary single thermodilution and postmortem gravimetry in sheep.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Kirov; Vsevolod V Kuzkov; Vladimir N Kuklin; Kristine Waerhaug; Lars J Bjertnaes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of extravascular lung water using the single indicator method in patients: research and potential clinical value.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Kathleen D Liu; Michael A Matthay
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  The impact of early goal-directed fluid management on survival in an experimental model of severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Constantin J C Trepte; Kai A Bachmann; Jan H Stork; Till J Friedheim; Andrea Hinsch; Matthias S Goepfert; Olliver Mann; Jakob R Izbicki; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Computed tomography to estimate cardiac preload and extravascular lung water. A retrospective analysis in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Konstantin Holzapfel; Jens Stollfuss; Tibor Schuster; Veit Phillip; Caroline Schultheiss; Roland M Schmid; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Comparison of quantitative computed tomography analysis and single-indicator thermodilution to measure pulmonary edema in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Chen Li; Jian-ning Zhang; Hai-peng Guo; Da-wei Wu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.819

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.