BACKGROUND: When determining eligibility for isoniazid preventive therapy of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, the cutoff value of the tuberculin skin test (TST) is often reduced from an induration of 10 mm in diameter to one of 5 mm in diameter to compensate for loss of sensitivity. The effectiveness of this reduction depends on the underlying mechanism: a gradual decrease in skin test responsiveness with decreasing immunocompetence or an all-or-nothing switch to complete anergy. No published studies have assessed this directly in patients with tuberculosis. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of TST responses and HIV infection among patients with sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in 6 hospitals in Tanzania. Skin test anergy was defined as a TST reaction < or =2 mm in diameter. RESULTS: Of 991 patients with complete results, 451 (45.5%) had HIV infection. Anergy was observed in 111 (24.6%) of 451 HIV-infected patients and 18 (3.3%) of 540 HIV-uninfected patients (P<.001). The reaction size distributions among nonanergic HIV-infected and uninfected patients showed a limited difference (mean diameter +/- standard deviation, 15.9 +/- 5.0 mm and 16.8 +/- 3.8 mm, respectively; P=.048). The sensitivity of the TST among HIV-uninfected patients was 91.1% at a cutoff value of 10 mm and 95.2% at a cutoff value of 5 mm. The sensitivity of the TST among HIV-infected patients was 64.3% at a cutoff value of 10 mm and 71.2% at a cutoff value of 5 mm; the sensitivity of the TST was 67.6% and 74.5%, respectively, after adjustment for tuberculosis-specific anergy. CONCLUSION: In subjects with tuberculosis disease and HIV infection, loss of TST sensitivity is predominantly attributable to anergy (i.e., an all-or-nothing phenomenon). The decrease in the proportion of false-negative TST results obtained by reducing the cutoff value from 10 mm to 5 mm is limited.
BACKGROUND: When determining eligibility for isoniazid preventive therapy of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infectedpatients, the cutoff value of the tuberculin skin test (TST) is often reduced from an induration of 10 mm in diameter to one of 5 mm in diameter to compensate for loss of sensitivity. The effectiveness of this reduction depends on the underlying mechanism: a gradual decrease in skin test responsiveness with decreasing immunocompetence or an all-or-nothing switch to complete anergy. No published studies have assessed this directly in patients with tuberculosis. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of TST responses and HIV infection among patients with sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in 6 hospitals in Tanzania. Skin test anergy was defined as a TST reaction < or =2 mm in diameter. RESULTS: Of 991 patients with complete results, 451 (45.5%) had HIV infection. Anergy was observed in 111 (24.6%) of 451 HIV-infectedpatients and 18 (3.3%) of 540 HIV-uninfectedpatients (P<.001). The reaction size distributions among nonanergic HIV-infected and uninfected patients showed a limited difference (mean diameter +/- standard deviation, 15.9 +/- 5.0 mm and 16.8 +/- 3.8 mm, respectively; P=.048). The sensitivity of the TST among HIV-uninfectedpatients was 91.1% at a cutoff value of 10 mm and 95.2% at a cutoff value of 5 mm. The sensitivity of the TST among HIV-infectedpatients was 64.3% at a cutoff value of 10 mm and 71.2% at a cutoff value of 5 mm; the sensitivity of the TST was 67.6% and 74.5%, respectively, after adjustment for tuberculosis-specific anergy. CONCLUSION: In subjects with tuberculosis disease and HIV infection, loss of TST sensitivity is predominantly attributable to anergy (i.e., an all-or-nothing phenomenon). The decrease in the proportion of false-negative TST results obtained by reducing the cutoff value from 10 mm to 5 mm is limited.
Authors: Faheem G Sheriff; Karim P Manji; Mohamed P Manji; Mohamedsuhel M Chagani; Rose M Mpembeni; Ahmed M Jusabani; Zaheerabbas R Alwani; Taha S Karimjee Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2010-03-07 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Marc Lipman; Mahdad Noursadeghi; Ibrahim Abubakar; Rishi K Gupta; Claire J Calderwood; Alexei Yavlinsky; Maria Krutikov; Matteo Quartagno; Maximilian C Aichelburg; Neus Altet; Roland Diel; Claudia C Dobler; Jose Dominguez; Joseph S Doyle; Connie Erkens; Steffen Geis; Pranabashis Haldar; Anja M Hauri; Thomas Hermansen; James C Johnston; Christoph Lange; Berit Lange; Frank van Leth; Laura Muñoz; Christine Roder; Kamila Romanowski; David Roth; Martina Sester; Rosa Sloot; Giovanni Sotgiu; Gerrit Woltmann; Takashi Yoshiyama; Jean-Pierre Zellweger; Dominik Zenner; Robert W Aldridge; Andrew Copas; Molebogeng X Rangaka Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Argita D Salindri; Sara C Auld; Marcos C Schechter; Neel R Gandhi; Matthew J Magee Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Peter J Dodd; Kerry A Millington; Azra C Ghani; Junior Mutsvangwa; Anthony E Butterworth; Ajit Lalvani; Elizabeth L Corbett Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Saidi Egwaga; Abdallah Mkopi; Nyagosya Range; Vera Haag-Arbenz; Amuri Baraka; Penny Grewal; Frank Cobelens; Hassan Mshinda; Fred Lwilla; Frank van Leth Journal: BMC Med Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 8.775