Literature DB >> 16885673

Elective induction of labor.

Lisa E Moore1, William F Rayburn.   

Abstract

Induction of labor rates have more than doubled nationwide in the past 15 years. The increase in medically induced inductions was slower than the overall increase, suggesting that inductions for marginal or elective reasons rose more rapidly. Elective inductions seem to account for at least half of all inductions and 10% of all deliveries. Whether the experience of an elective induction is satisfactory to the patient, obstetrician, and intrapartum crew warrants more widespread attention. Cesarean rates are high for nulliparas undergoing an induction with an unfavorable cervix. Prospective studies are limited or nonexistent to recommend induction of labor for elective or marginal indications. Until more prospective work is performed, it will be difficult to evaluate the true impact of the elective induction of labor on population-wide cesarean delivery rates. Strategies for increased obstetrician awareness are proposed through practice guidelines and through clinical research trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885673     DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  11 in total

1.  Failed labor induction in nulliparous women at term: the role of pelvic floor muscle strength.

Authors:  Turhan Aran; Mehmet A Osmanagaoglu; Cavit Kart; Suleyman Guven; Mustafa Sahin; Mesut A Unsal
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Factors that influence the practice of elective induction of labor: what does the evidence tell us?

Authors:  Jennifer Moore; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.638

3.  Concurrent analysis of choice and control in childbirth.

Authors:  Austyn Snowden; Colin Martin; Julie Jomeen; Caroline Hollins Martin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  "Early rupture of membranes" during induced labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas.

Authors:  Seung Mi Lee; Jeong Woo Park; Chan-Wook Park; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Duration of labor and the risk of severe postpartum hemorrhage: A case-control study.

Authors:  Lill Trine Nyfløt; Babill Stray-Pedersen; Lisa Forsén; Siri Vangen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Predicting factors for success of vaginal delivery in preterm induction with prostaglandin E2.

Authors:  Yoo Min Kim; Ju Young Park; Ji-Hee Sung; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-03-16

7.  Cesarean section on a rise-Does advanced maternal age explain the increase? A population register-based study.

Authors:  Eva Rydahl; Eugene Declercq; Mette Juhl; Rikke Damkjær Maimburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors and outcomes associated with the induction of labor in referral hospitals of Amhara regional state, Ethiopia: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Tibeb Zena Debele; Endeshaw Admassu Cherkos; Marta Berta Badi; Kiber Temesgen Anteneh; Fitsum Wolde Demssie; Abdella Amano Abdo; Muhabaw Shumye Mihret
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Risk of caesarean section after induced labour: do hospitals make a difference?

Authors:  Cristina Teixeira; Sofia Correia; Henrique Barros
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-05-28

10.  The Effect of Ultrasound-Measured Preinduction Cervical Length on Delivery Outcome in a Low-Resource Setting.

Authors:  Chidebe C Anikwe; Bartholomew C Okorochukwu; Emmanuel Uchendu; Cyril C Ikeoha
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2020-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.