Literature DB >> 16885536

Somatic cell nuclear transfer alters peri-implantation trophoblast differentiation in bovine embryos.

Daniel R Arnold1, Vilceu Bordignon, Réjean Lefebvre, Bruce D Murphy, Lawrence C Smith.   

Abstract

Abnormal placental development limits success in ruminant pregnancies derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), due to reduction in placentome number and consequently, maternal/fetal exchange. In the primary stages of an epithelial-chorial association, the maternal/fetal interface is characterized by progressive endometrial invasion by specialized trophoblast binucleate/giant cells (TGC). We hypothesized that dysfunctional placentation in SCNT pregnancies results from aberration in expression of genes known to be necessary for trophoblast proliferation (Mash2), differentiation (Hand1), and function (IFN-tau and PAG-9). We, therefore, compared the expression of these factors in trophoblast from bovine embryos derived from artificial insemination (AI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and SCNT prior to (day 17) and following (day 40 of gestation) implantation, as well as TGC densities and function. In preimplantation embryos, Mash2 mRNA was more abundant in SCNT embryos compared to AI, while Hand1 was highest in AI and IVF relative to SCNT embryos. IFN-tau mRNA abundance did not differ among groups. PAG-9 mRNA was undetectable in SCNT embryos, present in IVF embryos and highest in AI embryos. In postimplantation pregnancies, SCNT fetal cotyledons displayed higher Mash2 and Hand1 than AI and IVF tissues. Allelic expression of Mash2 was not different among the groups, which suggests that elevated mRNA expression was not due to altered imprinting status of Mash2. The day 40 SCNT cotyledons had the fewest number of TGC compared to IVF and AI controls. Thus, expression of genes critical to normal placental development is altered in SCNT bovine embryos, and this is expected to cause abnormal trophoblast differentiation and contribute to pregnancy loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885536     DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.01217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reproduction        ISSN: 1470-1626            Impact factor:   3.906


  10 in total

1.  A comparative study on expression profile of developmentally important genes during pre-implantation stages in buffalo hand-made cloned embryos derived from adult fibroblasts and amniotic fluid derived stem cells.

Authors:  Sadeesh Em; Fozia Shah; Meena Kataria; P S Yadav
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 2.  BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle.

Authors:  Alan D Ealy; Lydia K Wooldridge; Sarah R McCoski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of the method of conception and embryo transfer procedure on mid-gestation placenta and fetal development in an IVF mouse model.

Authors:  L Delle Piane; W Lin; X Liu; A Donjacour; P Minasi; A Revelli; E Maltepe; P F Rinaudo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Genome-wide identification, classification, and functional analysis of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors in the cattle, Bos Taurus.

Authors:  Fengmei Li; Wuyi Liu
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  High developmental potential in vitro and in vivo of cattle embryos cloned without micromanipulators.

Authors:  Lleretny Rodríguez; Felipe I Navarrete; Heribelt Tovar; José F Cox; Fidel Ovidio Castro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Comparative proteomic analysis of malformed umbilical cords from somatic cell nuclear transfer-derived piglets: implications for early postnatal death.

Authors:  Jong-Yi Park; Jae-Hwan Kim; Yun-Jung Choi; Kyu-Chan Hwang; Seong-Keun Cho; Ho-Hyun Park; Seung-Sam Paik; Teoan Kim; Chankyu Park; Hoon Taek Lee; Han Geuk Seo; Soo-Bong Park; Seongsoo Hwang; Jin-Hoi Kim
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  The endometrium responds differently to cloned versus fertilized embryos.

Authors:  Stefan Bauersachs; Susanne E Ulbrich; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Megan Minten; Myriam Reichenbach; Horst-Dieter Reichenbach; Helmut Blum; Thomas E Spencer; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chromatin modifying agents in the in vitro production of bovine embryos.

Authors:  Fabio Morato Monteiro; Clara Slade Oliveira; Letícia Zoccolaro Oliveira; Naiara Zoccal Saraiva; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; Flavia Lombardi Lopes; Daniel Robert Arnold; Joaquim Mansano Garcia
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2010-09-29

9.  Epigenetic modification with trichostatin A does not correct specific errors of somatic cell nuclear transfer at the transcriptomic level; highlighting the non-random nature of oocyte-mediated reprogramming errors.

Authors:  Sayyed Morteza Hosseini; Isabelle Dufort; Julie Nieminen; Fariba Moulavi; Hamid Reza Ghanaei; Mahdi Hajian; Farnoosh Jafarpour; Mohsen Forouzanfar; Hamid Gourbai; Abdol Hossein Shahverdi; Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani; Marc-André Sirard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Establishment of Trophectoderm Cell Lines from Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Embryos of Different Sources and Examination of In Vitro Developmental Competence, Quality, Epigenetic Status and Gene Expression in Cloned Embryos Derived from Them.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar Mohapatra; Anjit Sandhu; Karn Pratap Singh; Suresh Kumar Singla; Manmohan Singh Chauhan; Radheysham Manik; Prabhat Palta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.