Literature DB >> 1688490

Immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptors in human breast carcinomas. Evaluation of 130 cases and review of the literature regarding concordance with biochemical assay and clinical relevance.

D C Allred1, M A Bustamante, C O Daniel, H V Gaskill, A B Cruz.   

Abstract

An estrogen receptor-immunocytochemical assay (ER-ICA) was performed on frozen sections of 130 samples of human breast carcinoma. A standard dextran-coated charcoal assay (DCCA) was performed on the same samples. Concordance of results between the tests was 91%. The sensitivity and specificity of the ER-ICA, compared with the DCCA, were 92% and 89%, respectively. We describe the ER-ICA technique and review the literature regarding the use of the ER-ICA in evaluating breast cancer with respect to the agreement of results with the DCCA, the nature of discordant results, the ability to predict the clinical response to hormone therapy, and the ability to predict disease-free survival. The combined experience of many studies has shown that the ER-ICA is a highly specific and sensitive method for measuring the level of ERs in breast tumors with a high level of agreement with the DCCA. Early experience has suggested that the ER-ICA can predict the response to hormone therapy and disease-free survival, as well as or better than the DCCA. The evaluation of receptor heterogeneity, made possible by the ER-ICA, may enhance our ability to discriminate ER-positive tumors with a relatively high risk of recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1688490     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410130113018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  37 in total

Review 1.  Active cell death in hormone-dependent tissues.

Authors:  M P Tenniswood; R S Guenette; J Lakins; M Mooibroek; P Wong; J E Welsh
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  Clinical and pathological predictors of the response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Mónica Fernández-Sánchez; Armando Gamboa-Dominguez; Norma Uribe; Ana Cristina García-Ulloa; Diana Flores-Estrada; Myrna Candelaria; Oscar Arrieta
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Significance of immunohistochemistry in breast cancer.

Authors:  Dana Carmen Zaha
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

4.  Laminin 332 expression and prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Philip M Carpenter; Argyrios Ziogas; Emma M Markham; Alegria S Cantillep; Rui Yan; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Frequency of oestrogen and progesterone receptor positivity by immunohistochemical analysis in 7016 breast carcinomas: correlation with patient age, assay sensitivity, threshold value, and mammographic screening.

Authors:  A Rhodes; B Jasani; A J Balaton; D M Barnes; K D Miller
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Integration of risk factors to allow patient selection for adjuvant systemic therapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  W C Wood
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Targeting Estrogen Receptor Beta in a Phase 2 Study of High-Dose Estradiol in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Wisconsin Oncology Network Study.

Authors:  Kari B Wisinski; Wei Xu; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Sandeep Saha; KyungMann Kim; Anne Traynor; Leah Dietrich; Robert Hegeman; Dhimant Patel; Jules Blank; Josephine Harter; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Oestrogen receptor analysis: correlation between enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical methods.

Authors:  T A Aasmundstad; O A Haugen; E Johannesen; A L Høe; S Kvinnsland
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Estrogen receptors in 699 primary breast cancers: a comparison of immunohistochemical and biochemical methods.

Authors:  A Molino; R Micciolo; M Turazza; F Bonetti; Q Piubello; A Corgnati; L Sperotto; G Martignoni; A Bonetti; R Nortilli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Analysis of prognostic factors and treatment modality changes in breast cancer: a single institution study in Korea.

Authors:  Won-Suk Lee; Jeong Eon Lee; Jung Han Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Jung-Hyun Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.