Literature DB >> 1688454

Comprehending figurative referential descriptions.

R W Gibbs1.   

Abstract

A common way of referring to people is with figurative language. People can be referred to metaphorically, as in calling a terrible boxer "a creampuff," or metonymically, as in calling a naval admiral "the brass." The present studies investigated the anaphoric inferences that occur during comprehension of figurative referential descriptions. Subjects read short narratives, each ending in either a literal or figurative description of another person. Immediately after the last line of each text, the anaphoric antecedent for the description of another person. Immediately after the last line of each text, the anaphoric antecedent for the description was presented in a probe recognition task. The results of three experiments indicated that metaphoric and metonymic referential descriptions reinstate their antecedents in the course of comprehension. Subjects were faster at reinstating the antecedents for literal referential descriptions than at reinstating metaphoric and metonymic descriptions. Moreover, people understand metaphoric referential descriptions more easily than they do metonymic ones. The implications of these findings for theories of anaphora resolution and figurative language comprehension are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1688454     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.1.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  Comprehending anaphoric metaphors.

Authors:  Raluca Budiu; John R Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Seana Coulson; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

3.  Seeing what they read and hearing what they say: readers' representation of the story characters' world.

Authors:  Celia M Klin; April M Drumm
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

4.  Kill the song—steal the show: what does distinguish predicative metaphors from decomposable idioms?

Authors:  Stéphanie Caillies; Christelle Declercq
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-06

5.  Repeating phrases across unrelated narratives: evidence of text repetition effects.

Authors:  Celia M Klin; Angela S Ralano; Kristin M Weingartner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

6.  Metaphor and readers' attributions of intimacy.

Authors:  William S Horton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

7.  Repeated text in unrelated passages: Repetition versus meaning selection effects.

Authors:  Celia M Klin; April M Drumm; Angela S Ralano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-07

8.  Metaphoric reference: when metaphors are not understood as easily as literal expressions.

Authors:  K H Onishi; G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-11

9.  It's hard to offend the college: effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Differentiating among pragmatic uses of words through timed sensicality judgments.

Authors:  Valentina Bambini; Marta Ghio; Andrea Moro; Petra B Schumacher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.