Cancer cells are defined by their ability to divide uncontrollably and metastasize to secondary sites in the body. Consequently, tumor cell migration represents a promising target for anticancer drug development. Using our high-throughput cell migration assay, we have screened several classes of compounds for noncytotoxic tumor cell migration inhibiting activity. One such compound, apocynin (4-acetovanillone), is oxidized by peroxidases to yield a variety of oligophenolic and quinone-type compounds that are recognized inhibitors of NADPH oxidase and may be inhibitors of the small G protein Rac1 that controls cell migration. We report here that while apocynin itself is not effective, apocynin derivatives inhibit migration of the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-435 at subtoxic concentrations; the migration of nonmalignant MCF10A breast cells is unaffected. These compounds also cause a significant rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton, cell rounding, and decreased levels of active Rac1 and its related G protein Cdc42. These results may suggest a promising new route to the development of novel anticancer therapeutics.
Cancer cells are defined by their ability to divide uncontrollably and metastasize to secondary sites in the body. Consequently, tumor cell migration represents a promising target for anticancer drug development. Using our high-throughput cell migration assay, we have screened several classes of compounds for noncytotoxic tumor cell migration inhibiting activity. One such compound, apocynin (4-acetovanillone), is oxidized by peroxidases to yield a variety of oligophenolic and quinone-type compounds that are recognized inhibitors of NADPH oxidase and may be inhibitors of the small G protein Rac1 that controls cell migration. We report here that while apocynin itself is not effective, apocynin derivatives inhibit migration of the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-435 at subtoxic concentrations; the migration of nonmalignant MCF10A breast cells is unaffected. These compounds also cause a significant rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton, cell rounding, and decreased levels of active Rac1 and its related G protein Cdc42. These results may suggest a promising new route to the development of novel anticancer therapeutics.
Cancer remains the second highest cause of death in
the US [1, 2]. Unlike primary tumors that can be surgically
removed and treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or
radiotherapy, secondary tumors (metastases) are difficult to treat
because metastatic tumor cells disseminate throughout the body,
making them almost impossible to target. While the majority of
anticancer drugs target the hyper-proliferation of metastatic
cells and are efficacious in treating the beginning stages of
cancer, none are curative for metastatic disease [3, 4]. Many
of these drugs are ineffective if the cancer is not treated
immediately and may prove toxic to healthy tissue. Cytotoxic
anticancer drugs also generate a variety of adverse side effects,
including nausea, vomiting, suppressed immune system, and hair
loss [5].Nontoxic inhibitors of cancer cell migration are
therefore an attractive new class of potential anticancer drugs,
offering the promise that potentially malignant tumors could be
confined to their tissue of origin through multiple rounds of
traditional adjuvant therapy. However, identifying such compounds
is complicated by the highly complex and tightly
controlled cell migration process [6-8]. Migrating cells
use proteolytic enzymes to digest “holes” in the surrounding
ECM, and then extend cytoplasmic projections (pseudopodia) from
the cell body in the direction of migration, forming a “ leading
edge,” behind which the remainder of the cell follows [9].
Extension and contraction of pseudopodia occur in a cyclic
pattern, giving rise to the typical “crawling” behavior of
moving cells. Pseudopodia are enriched in proteins thought to
control the direction and rate of cell migration [10]. These
include extracellular proteases, extracellular matrix receptors
(eg, integrins) and adapter proteins that link these receptors to
the actomyosin cytoskeleton, as well as numerous signaling
molecules, including GTPases (Rac1, Cdc42, RhoA) that control the
assembly and activation of this cytoskeleton [11]. However,
how these molecules work to choreograph the sequential
rearrangement of cytoskeletal elements during cell migration is
not well understood.The number of known compounds that specifically
inhibit this cyclical process is likewise very low. To address
this issue, we have developed an automated high-throughput
screening assay for identifying nontoxic inhibitors of cancer cell
migration. We have previously used this assay to
characterize the antimigratory behavior of carboxyaminoimidazole,
perillyl alcohol, and tamoxifen on breast cancer cells
[12, 13]. Having illustrated the nontoxic effects of these
well-known compounds on cancer cell migration, we have now turned
our attention to identifying new, previously unidentified
inhibitors of tumor cell migration.Natural products present a potentially rich source for
novel anticancer drugs. Plants, in particular, are repositories of
biodiversity, and therefore, represent a source of many medicines.
Several therapeutic cancer treatments have been derived from
compounds found in plants (eg, taxol, paclitaxel, perillyl
alcohol) [14, 15]. Apocynin, obtained from the roots of
Picrorhiza kurroa, is another potential anticancer
compound. Its rhizomes have been used in oriental traditional
medicine for thousands of years, treating a variety of diseases of
the liver and lungs [16]. Apocynin disrupts the assembly of
the NADPH oxidase complex, which includes the same Rac1 protein
that regulates the actin cytoskeleton during cell migration
[17, 18]. The possible link between apocynin and Rac1 inhibition suggests that apocynin may be a source for inhibitors
of Rac1-mediated tumor cell migration. In this study, we report
the application of an in vitro screening assay to identify
apocynin-derived inhibitors of Rac1-based tumor cell migration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tissue culture media (DMEM, RPMI) and penicillin
G-streptomycin sulfate (GPS) were purchased from Mediatech
(Cellgro, Va). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Gemini
Bio-Products (Woodland, Calif). Trypsin-EDTA was obtained from
Sigma Chemical Co (St Louis, Mo). F-actin/G-actin in vivo assay
kit (BK037) was obtained from Cytoskeleton Inc (Denver, Colo).
PAK-1 PBD agarose beads were obtained from Upstate Cell Signaling
(Lake Placid, NY). Mouse monoclonal IgG2b antibody against Rac1
(Cat# 610650) and mouse monoclonal IgG1 antibody against Cdc42
(Cat# 610928) were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories
(San Diego, Calif). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat
antimouse IgG and HRP-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG secondary
antibodies were obtained from Jackson Immuno Research (West Grove,
Pa). The protein assay kit was purchased from Pierce (Rockford,
Ill). MTT and apocynin were purchased from Sigma. Phalloidin and
calcein AM were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, Ore). MIC
plates were generously donated by Millipore (Danvers, Mass).
Unless otherwise specified, the other standard reagents were
obtained from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ).
Synthesis of compounds
Apocynin (1 g) was dissolved in 5 mL
dimethylformamide and transferred to 490 mL phosphate buffer
(20 mM, pH 7) to obtain a concentration of 12 mM apocynin.
To this solution, 5 mL of a 1 mg/ml soybean peroxidase
(SBP) solution in aqueous buffer were added. The reaction vessel
was wrapped in aluminum foil and the solution was magnetically
stirred at room temperature. The reaction was initiated by the
addition of a concentrated H solution (30% w/v),
added continuously via syringe pump at 0.1 ml/h for
12 hours) resulting in a total of 20 mM
H fed to the reaction. The resulting precipitate was
collected by centrifugation in 50 mL conical centrifugation
tubes at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes, and washed three times
with DI water. The individual pellets were pooled, transferred to
1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes, and dried under vacuum. All
compounds except A5 were synthesized at pH 7-8 and collected after
the first wash. Compound A5 was synthesized at pH 5 and collected
similarly.
Cell culture
Cryopreserved MDA-MB 435breast cancer cells were obtained from
the ATCC (Manassas, Va) and were grown according to the
manufacturers' instructions. Briefly, cells were plated at 5 × 103 cells/cm2 in a T75 flask (75 cm2) for
continuous passaging in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS,
1% L-glutamine [29.2 mg/mL], penicillin G [10,000 U/mL],
and streptomycin sulfate [10,000 μg/mL]. Medium was
changed twice weekly and cells were detached by trypsin-EDTA and
passaged into fresh culture flasks at a ratio of 1 : 10 upon reaching confluence. Cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 95% air and 5% CO.
Adhesion assays
Cell adhesion assays were performed as previously
described using Sarstedt 96-well suspension cell culture plates
[19]. Tissue culture plates were coated with purified
fibronectin at a concentration of 20 μg/mL for 1 hour
at room temperature. Wells were washed twice with PBS and
incubated with nd-blotto (5% nondairy creamer in
PBS + 0.2% Tween 20) for 30 minutes prior to
the assay. Cells were allowed to attach for 30 minutes at
37°C in the presence of either 203 ng/μl, 36 ng/μl, or 3.6 ng/μl per well of each of the four compounds, or their respective vehicle controls. Cells were
subsequently fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde, washed twice in PBS,
and incubated in crystal violet dye for 15 minutes. Wells were
washed thoroughly with water and the violet dye was extracted with
10% SDS solution. Absorbance was measured using a TECAN
SPECTAFluor spectrophotometer at 595 nm and relative adhesion
was compared to cells attached to nd-blotto.
Migration assays
Cell migration assays were performed using
8 μm MIC plates. Control filters were coated with purified
fibronectin at a concentration of 20 μg/ml or nd-blotto
for 1 hour at room temperature prior to assay. Basal chambers
for the nd-blotto wells were filled with migration medium
(DMEM + 1% sodium pyruvate + 1X GPS)
while the basal chambers for the remaining wells were filled with
control medium. Cell suspensions in migration medium were seeded
at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well. One lane of cells
was left untreated while the rest were given either one of the
four compounds at final concentrations of either
203 ng/μl, 36 ng/μl, or 3.6 ng/μl per well, or their respective vehicle control. Migrations were allowed
to run for 18 hours at 37°C. Filters were then
incubated for 30 minutes with 5 μM calcein AM and
washed thoroughly with PBS. Residual cells were swabbed from the
top of the wells to avoid false readings. To quantitate migration,
plates were read at 485Ex/535Em with a TECAN SPECTAFluor
spectrophotometer. Relative fluorescence values for each
experimental condition were expressed relative to FN and nd-blotto
controls.
Viability
Cell viability assays were performed using Sarstedt
96-well suspension cell culture plates. Cells were plated at a
density of 5 × 103 cells per well in a half and half
mixture of migration medium and control medium. One lane was left
untreated as a positive control while the remaining lanes were
treated as per the migration plates with the compounds and
vehicles. After aspirating the medium, cells were supplied with
fresh medium containing 5 mg/ml of MTT
(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) and
incubated for 4 hours at 37°C. Medium was again
aspirated and 100 μl of 10% SDS was added to each
well. Plates were placed back in the incubator for 2 hours and
absorbance was measured using a TECAN SPECTAFluor
spectrophotometer at 570 nm. Viability was expressed relative
to the untreated control.
Immunohistochemistry
MDA-MB 435 cells were grown on glass cover slips
coated with 20 μg/ml of fibronectin for 4 hours in the
presence of one of the four compounds at a final concentration of
15.2 ng/μl or the respective ethanol vehicle control.
Cells were then fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes
and washed thoroughly with PBS. Cover slips were blocked with
PBS + 1% BSA for 30 minutes and again washed
thoroughly with PBS. TRITC conjugated phalloidin was incubated
with the cover slips at a 1 : 200 concentration in blocking
solution for 1 hour at room temperature. Cover slips were
mounted using Prolong antifade medium (Molecular Probes). Cells
were visualized with a Nikon TE2000-S inverted fluorescence/phase
contrast microscope equipped with a digital SPOT camera.
Actin isolation
Actin was isolated using an F-actin/G-actin in vivo
assay kit. Briefly, cells were plated on four separate 25 cm
tissue culture plates which were coated with fibronectin for
4 hours at a concentration of 30 × 106 cells per plate. Compounds 5 and 9 were each added to one of the plates at a final
concentration of 36 ng/μl. The other plates were used as
an untreated condition and vehicle control. Cells were grown for
4 hours and harvested in approximately 1 mL of warm LAS2
buffer (LAS1 stabilization buffer with 100 mM ATP and protease
inhibitors). Cell lysates were homogenized using a 25 G needle
and incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes, followed by
centrifugation at 100,000 xg for 60 minutes at
37°C. Supernatants containing G-actin were immediately
removed and the pellets containing the F-actin were dissociated
using cytochalasin-D in ice cold dH.
Rac1/Cdc42 isolation
Rac1 and Cdc42 isolation was
done using PAK-1 PBD agarose beads. Briefly, treated and untreated
cells were lysed with 1 mL of MLB (magnesium-containing lysis
buffer) (25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl,
1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 25 mM NaF, 10 mM
MgCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, protease inhibitors). PAK-1agarose (30 μl) was added to
each lysate and agitated for 1 hour at 4°C. Beads were
collected by centrifugation and the supernatant discarded. Beads
were then washed three times with MLB.
Western blotting
Western blots were performed on actin lysates and Rac1/Cdc42
lysates. Once protein concentrations were determined using a
Pierce micro-BCA kit, lysates were suspended in Laemmli sample
buffer and resolved on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The gels were then
electrophoretically transblotted to Trans-Blot nitrocellulose
membranes (0.2 μm) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif). The
membranes were incubated with blocking solution (5% nonfat dried
milk in 1X PBS + 0.2% Tween-20 (PBST)) for
1 hour, then probed with either a G-actin antibody (1 : 1000),
Rac1 antibody (1 : 250), or a Cdc42 antibody (1 : 250) for 2 hours at room temperature. After three washes with PBST,
membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary IgG (1 : 25, 000)
for 1 hour, followed by another three washes with
PBST. Immunoreactive bands were detected using the SuperSignal
chemiluminescent reagent (Pierce) and quantitatively analyzed by
normalizing band intensities to the controls on scanned films by
IMAGEJ software.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated a minimum of two times and the
representative data were presented as mean ±
SE. Statistical analyses were preformed using
Student's unpaired t test, and a p
value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
A subset of apocynin derivatives inhibit cancer
cell migration at nonlethal dosesWe employed our high-throughput assay to determine if
apocynin and its derivatives had a physiological effect on cancer
cell migration. Apocynin itself had no substantial effect on
migration, nor did other similarly structured compounds and their
dimers, such as vanillin (data not shown). Of the nearly 100
compounds screened, only a handful yielded any significant
inhibition of migration. Peroxidase catalyzed
oxidation of apocynin leads to a mixture of products
(Scheme 1(a)); however, at pH 8 the major
oxidation product is a trimeric hydroxylated quinone of m/z
50819a (Scheme 1(b)). Results from a
representative ineffective apocynin derivative, A5, are shown in
Figure 1(a). At sublethal doses, the effective compounds
blocked migration by at least 40%, and as high as 80% (Figures
1(b)–1(d)); at higher, toxic doses, migration was
completely inhibited as expected (not shown). The inhibition of
cell migration seen with the mixture of apocynin oxidation
products at pH 8 could be predominantly due to the trimer
hydroxylated quinone.
Scheme 1
(a) Typical products obtained by the SBP catalyzed
oxidation of apocynin. (b) Probable structure of the major product
obtained from the SBP catalyzed oxidation of apocynin at pH 8 that
had a significant inhibition on cancer cell
migration.
Figure 1
Migration
(solid) and viability (shaded) assays of MDA-MB 435 breast cancer
cells in the presence or absence of compound A5 (panel (a)),
compound A8 (panel (b)), compound 5 (panel (c)), and compound 9
(panel (d)). Migration studies were performed for 18 hours
using Millipore MIC plates, and cells were stained with calcein
AM. Viability was assessed by utilizing an MTT assay and measuring
absorbance at 570 nm. Three concentrations of each compound
were used; [low] = 3.6 ng/μl, [med] = 36 ng/μl, and [high] = 203 ng/μ l. Data not shown for high concentration.
Apocynin derivatives inhibit migration at the level of the actin cytoskeletonTo address the possible mechanisms underlying this
nontoxic migration inhibition activity, we further characterized
the cells treated with these compounds. In 30-minutes-adhesion
assays, the active compounds had no appreciable inhibitory effect
on cell adhesion to fibronectin as compared to the controls
(Figure 2). The slight decreases seen in adhesion
caused by compounds A5, A8, and 9 correlated to the minor levels
of cell death observed in Figure 1. Staining with
fluorescently tagged phalloidin revealed that, unlike control
MDA-MB 435cancer cells, which spread and formed well-defined
actin stress fibers when plated on fibronectin
(Figure 3, panels (a) and (b)), cells treated with the
migration inhibiting drugs (compound A8, Figure 3,
panel (c); compound 9, panel (e)) failed to organize their
filamentous actin (F-actin) cytoskeleton and remained round. Cells
treated with the ineffective compound A5 (Figure 3,
panel (d)) spread well and organized distinct stress fibers as
seen in controls. These changes in actin organization were
likewise reflected in western blots for monomeric actin (G-actin)
and F-actin in treated and untreated cell lysates
(Figure 4): cells treated with active compounds 5 and
9 contained approximately 50% less F-actin compared to control
cells, while the amount of G-actin was comparable in all
conditions.
Figure 2
Static 5 hours
adhesion of MDA-MB 435 breast cancer cells to purified fibronectin
in the presence and absence of test compounds. Concentrations used
were 36 ng/μl. Adherent cells were stained with crystal
violet, solubilized in 1% SDS, and absorbance determined at
570 nm. Values represent mean ± standard
deviation.
Figure 3
Rearrangement of actin
cytoskeleton in treated and untreated MDA-MB 435 breast cancer
cells. Cells were plated on fibronectin for 4 hours in the
presence of either compound 9 (panel (c)), compound A5 (panel
(d)), or compound A8 (panel (e)) at a final concentration of
15.2 ng/μl and were compared to the positive control
(panel (a)) and the ethanol vehicle (panel (b)).Cells were fixed
and stained for F-actin using TRITC-phalloidin. Bar =
50 μm.
Figure 4
(a) Western blot for G- and F-actin levels in MDA-MB 435
breast cancer cells cultured on fibronectin for 4 hours.
Positive control (lanes 1 and 2) and ethanol control (lanes 3 and
4) were compared to cells in the presence of 36 ng/μl of
compound 5 (lanes 5 and 6) and 36 ng/μl of compound 9
(lanes 7 and 8) by probing with an antibody for G-actin. Odd
numbered lanes represent G-actin while even numbered lanes
represent F-actin totals. (b) Densitometry of the intensity of G-
and F-actin bands.
Small G-proteins are well-known moderators of the
actin cytoskeleton. To test their possible sensitivity to
these compounds, we used PAK-PDB pull down
assays to quantitate active amounts of both Rac1 and Cdc42
(Figures 5 and 6, resp). As shown in
Figure 5, levels of active Rac1 changed very little
between untreated cells, vehicle treated cells, and cells treated
with the inactive compound A5. In contrast, cells treated with
active compounds experienced a 40%–70% decrease in the amount
of active Rac1. Similar results were seen with active Cdc42 in
Figure 6. Relative to the untreated control there was
a small decrease in cells treated with A5, presumably due to the
presence of vehicle which yielded the same slight decrease.
However, we observed an even greater decrease in cells treated
with compounds A8, 5, and 9.
Figure 5
(a) Western blot of MDA-MB 435 breast cancer cells
cultured on fibronectin for 1 hour. Active Rac1 was isolated
using a PAK-PBD pull down assay. Positive control (lane 1) and
ethanol control (lane 2) were compared to cells treated with
36 ng/μl of either compound A5, A8, 5, or 9 (lanes 3, 4,
5, and 6, resp) by probing with a monoclonal antibody for Rac1.
(b) Densitometric analysis of Rac1 band intensities.
Figure 6
(a) Western blot of MDA-MB 435 breast cancer cells
cultured on fibronectin for 1 hour. Active Cdc42 was isolated
using a PAK-PBD pull down assay. Positive control (lane 1) and
ethanol control (lane 2) were compared to cells treated with
36 ng/μl of either compound A5, A8, 5, or 9 (lanes 3, 4,
5, and 6, resp) by probing with a monoclonal antibody for Cdc42.
(b) Densitometric analysis of Cdc42 band
intensities.
DISCUSSION
Our screening assay has previously identified three
noncytotoxic compounds that inhibit tumor cell migration. All the
three are already in clinical trials or have been approved for
clinical use [20-22]. Here we expanded our search to
compounds that inhibit cell migration but whose effects on cancer
are unknown, starting with compounds that inhibit
intracellular signaling events that may be linked to cancer cell
migration. The target of this study, apocynin, upon
peroxidase-catalyzed metabolic activation, interferes with NADPH
oxidase and inhibits lymphocyte migration through a G-protein
regulated pathway without affecting adhesion. Reactive oxygen
species generated by NADPH oxidase also control actin structure
[23]. Apocynin or its metabolites have also been shown to
affect the migration of polymorphonuclear granulocytes, suggesting
its mechanism of action is conserved throughout cell types
[24].Our data collectively suggests that the compounds we
identified induce sufficient rearrangement of the actin
cytoskeleton to inhibit migration but not cause cell death over an
18-hour period. Major disruptors of the actin cytoskeleton such as
cytochalasin-D trigger apoptosis [25], but our compounds do
not elicit such a severe response. This disruption of the actin
cytoskeleton leads to cell rounding without an appreciable
decrease in cell adhesion. The highest effective doses used in our
study reduced adhesion by 20%–40% (Figure 2), but
lower doses which also inhibited cell migration resulted in no
significant decrease in adhesion (data not shown). That these
cells continued to be adherent may explain why they remained
viable even after treatment. MDA-MB 435breast cancer cells
contain the characteristic integrin receptors to bind fibronectin;
α3β1, α5β1, and αVβ3
[26]. It is through these integrins, particularly the α5β1 pairing, that cells are able to receive survival
signaling which includes activation of the phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway [27]. Akt signaling pathways have
significant roles in response to extracellular stimuli, serving to
regulate a number of cellular functions including nutrient
metabolism, cell growth, apoptosis, and survival [28].The Rho family of proteins control remodeling of the
actin cytoskeleton [29, 30]. These small G-proteins, which
include Rac1 and Cdc42, are well known for their ability to
modulate and rearrange the actin cytoskeleton. They regulate
signal transduction pathways that mediate distinct cytoskeletal
rearrangements required for the production of actin-rich
protrusions called lamellipodia and fillipodia and then subsequent
cell migration [31]. Our data suggest that the active
derivatives of apocynin might be inhibiting migration by altering
the activity of these proteins.Apocynin or its oxidation products inhibit
translocation of the cytosolic p47-phox and p67-phox proteins to
their membrane fraction counterparts, causing inactivation of
NADPH oxidase [32]. Active Rac1 is necessary for the
translocation of p47-phox and p67-phox, though it does not mediate
it directly. Rac1's role in NADPH oxidase activation is not well
understood, but it is able to bind p67-phox, and this binding may
be what causes the final formation of the active NADPH oxidase
complex. When Rac1 is in its inactive form, there is a decreased
level of O, signifying inactive NADPH oxidase
[33]. NADPH oxidase has also been shown to associate with the
actin cytoskeleton, implicating another mode by which Rac1 may
manage cytoskeletal structure [34]. Other inhibitors of NADPH
oxidase also result in decreased cell migration [35]. This
could be caused by the decreased activation of Rac1 from low
levels of reactive oxygen species, attributed to diminished
activity of NADPH oxidase [36]. Our data suggests that the
compounds may act through Rac1 also.The oxidation products of peroxidase catalysis on
apocynin may mimic the active metabolite synthesis of
myeloperoxidase found in blood. Thus, the inhibitory effect may be
due to the in vivo activation of a biologically inert compound to
give a highly potent cell proliferation inhibitor. Peroxidase
catalysis does not result in single products [37]. Rather,
the enzyme generates a mixture of oxidation products. We have
purified several of these compounds in this work and tested their
abilities to inhibit cell proliferation. In therapy, however, the
action of myeloperoxidase would most likely generate a mixture of
metabolites. The influence of this mixture on biological activity
may serve to increase the potency of the inhibitory effect. Such a
study is left for future investigations.
Authors: Walter M Stadler; Gary Rosner; Eric Small; Donna Hollis; Brian Rini; S Donald Zaentz; John Mahoney; Mark J Ratain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew C Zimmerman; Ryan P Dunlay; Eric Lazartigues; Yulong Zhang; Ram V Sharma; John F Engelhardt; Robin L Davisson Journal: Circ Res Date: 2004-07-22 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Seung-Joo Nam; In Soo Oh; Young Ha Yoon; Bo In Kwon; Wonseok Kang; Hee Ja Kim; Seung Hoon Nahm; Youn-Hee Choi; Seung-Hyo Lee; Vito Racanelli; Eui-Cheol Shin Journal: Clin Exp Med Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Walter C Prozialeck; Joshua R Edwards; Daniel W Nebert; James M Woods; Aaron Barchowsky; William D Atchison Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Cristiane Ribeiro-Pereira; João Alfredo Moraes; Mariele de Jesus Souza; Francisco R Laurindo; Maria Augusta Arruda; Christina Barja-Fidalgo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 3.240