PURPOSE: To assess the disease-stabilizing activity of carboxyaminoimidazole (CAI) in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) using a randomized discontinuation trial (RDT) design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recruited patients had a performance status of 0 to 2, minimal neuropathy or cerebellar dysfunction, measurable disease, and normal organ function. Treatment with 250 mg/d CAI was initiated in all patients and continued until disease progression in those with an objective response. Protocol treatment was discontinued for unacceptable toxicityor progressive disease; patients with stable disease at the 16-week evaluation point were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to continued CAI or placebo. The primary end point was the stable disease rate in the randomized groups. RESULTS:A total of 368 patients were accrued and received therapy. Ninety percent had a performance status of 0 or 1, 80% underwent a prior nephrectomy, and 41% had received no prior systemic therapy. Serious or life-threatening toxicity was experienced by 34%, with asthenia (15%) and neuropsychiatric difficulties (7%) being most common. At the randomization point, 51% of patients had progressed, 30% withdrew, 1% experienced a partial response, and 17% had stable disease and were randomly assigned. A Bayesian futility analysis utilizing the first 49 randomly assigned patients suggested that the probability of demonstrating a higher stable disease rate in the experimental group was less than 9% even under the most optimistic a priori assumptions, and further trial accrual was halted. CONCLUSION: CAI is inactive in RCC. The RDT design should be further explored for evaluating activity of putative disease stabilizing agents.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To assess the disease-stabilizing activity of carboxyaminoimidazole (CAI) in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) using a randomized discontinuation trial (RDT) design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recruited patients had a performance status of 0 to 2, minimal neuropathy or cerebellar dysfunction, measurable disease, and normal organ function. Treatment with 250 mg/d CAI was initiated in all patients and continued until disease progression in those with an objective response. Protocol treatment was discontinued for unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease; patients with stable disease at the 16-week evaluation point were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to continued CAI or placebo. The primary end point was the stable disease rate in the randomized groups. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients were accrued and received therapy. Ninety percent had a performance status of 0 or 1, 80% underwent a prior nephrectomy, and 41% had received no prior systemic therapy. Serious or life-threatening toxicity was experienced by 34%, with asthenia (15%) and neuropsychiatric difficulties (7%) being most common. At the randomization point, 51% of patients had progressed, 30% withdrew, 1% experienced a partial response, and 17% had stable disease and were randomly assigned. A Bayesian futility analysis utilizing the first 49 randomly assigned patients suggested that the probability of demonstrating a higher stable disease rate in the experimental group was less than 9% even under the most optimistic a priori assumptions, and further trial accrual was halted. CONCLUSION:CAI is inactive in RCC. The RDT design should be further explored for evaluating activity of putative disease stabilizing agents.
Authors: Dirk Schadendorf; Jedd D Wolchok; F Stephen Hodi; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Piotr Rutkowski; Jean-Jacques Grob; C Lance Cowey; Christopher D Lao; Jason Chesney; Caroline Robert; Kenneth Grossmann; David McDermott; Dana Walker; Rafia Bhore; James Larkin; Michael A Postow Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edwin M Posadas; Rafi S Ahmed; Theodore Karrison; Russell Z Szmulewitz; Peter H O'Donnell; James L Wade; James Shen; Murali Gururajan; Margarit Sievert; Walter M Stadler Journal: Prostate Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Christine M Hartford; Apurva A Desai; Linda Janisch; Theodore Karrison; Victor M Rivera; Lori Berk; John W Loewy; Hedy Kindler; Walter M Stadler; Heather L Knowles; Camille Bedrosian; Mark J Ratain Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nilofer Azad; Alyssa Perroy; Erin Gardner; Chiyo K Imamura; Cynthia Graves; Gisele A Sarosy; Lori Minasian; Herbert Kotz; Miranda Raggio; William D Figg; Elise C Kohn Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: M Gautier; I Dhennin-Duthille; A S Ay; P Rybarczyk; I Korichneva; H Ouadid-Ahidouch Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 8.739