Literature DB >> 16882116

Patients with head and neck cancer prefer individualized cognitive behavioural therapy.

C J Semple1, L Dunwoody, K Sullivan, W G Kernohan.   

Abstract

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is a widely practiced and approved form of psychotherapy for many psychosocial difficulties. As the efficacy of CBT is recognized, its demand has increased and today exceeds the availability of qualified practitioners. Therefore, the effectiveness of delivering CBT using less labour-intensive modes than individualised therapy has been explored. These include group therapy, bibliotherapy and computer assisted therapy. Given the UK Government's impetus towards patient choice and involvement in the planning of healthcare, it was thought essential to ascertain the preferred delivery mode of patients with head and neck cancer for a CBT based intervention. Therefore, a small retrospective cohort (n= 28) of patients following treatment for head and neck cancer were sent postal questionnaires to ascertain their preferences on mode of CBT delivery. Simultaneously, the views of accredited cognitive behaviour therapists (n= 14) were determined on the optimal mode of CBT delivery to these patients. Findings indicated that patients preferred the more individualized mode of CBT delivery, namely one-to-one therapy, followed closely by bibliotherapy, with group format being the least preferred option. Professionals concurred with patients, in that one-to-one interaction was considered an optimal mode of CBT delivery, but professionals considered it equal to group therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882116     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  7 in total

1.  The health professionals' perspectives of support needs of adult head and neck cancer survivors and their families: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Lauren J Breen; Moira O'Connor; Samuel Calder; Vivian Tai; Jade Cartwright; Janet M Beilby
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Feasibility of EASE: a psychosocial program to improve symptom management in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristin M Kilbourn; Derek Anderson; Allison Costenaro; Kate Lusczakoski; Evelinn Borrayo; David Raben
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Efficacy of stress management program for depressive patients with advanced head and neck cancer: A single-center pilot study.

Authors:  Kanako Ichikura; Nao Nakayama; Shiho Matsuoka; Yosuke Ariizumi; Takuro Sumi; Taro Sugimoto; Yuko Fukase; Norio Murayama; Hirokuni Tagaya; Takahiro Asakage; Eisuke Matsushima
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  A unique interactive cognitive behavioral training program for front-line cancer care professionals.

Authors:  Karen Clark; Paul Greene; Kate DuHamel; Matthew Loscalzo; Marcia Grant; Kim Glazier; William Redd
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  [Best supportive care in head and neck cancer].

Authors:  Michaela Salzwimmer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

6.  Development and evaluation of a problem-focused psychosocial intervention for patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Cherith J Semple; Lynn Dunwoody; W George Kernohan; Eilis McCaughan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Illness cognitions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: predicting quality of life outcome.

Authors:  Margreet Scharloo; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Ton P M Langeveld; Els van Velzen-Verkaik; Margreet M Doorn-Op den Akker; Adrian A Kaptein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.603

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.