Literature DB >> 16880298

Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Tina Lavender1, Zarko Alfirevic, Stephen Walkinshaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The World Health Organization recommends partograms with a 4-hour action line, denoting the timing of intervention for prolonged labor; others recommend earlier intervention. We assessed the effect of different action line positioning on birth outcomes.
METHODS: A randomized trial of primigravid women with uncomplicated pregnancies, in spontaneous labor at term, was conducted in the northwest of England. Women were assigned to have their labors recorded on a partogram with an action line 2 or 4 hours to the right of the alert line. If progress crossed the action line, diagnosis of prolonged labor was made and managed according to standard protocol. Primary outcomes were rate of cesarean delivery and maternal satisfaction.
RESULTS: A total of 3,000 women were randomly assigned to groups; 2,975 (99.2%) were available for analysis. Questionnaires were completed by 1,929 (65%) women. There were no differences in cesarean delivery rate (136/1,490 compared with 135/1,485; relative risk [RR] 1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.26) or women dissatisfied with labor experience (72/962 compared with 81/967; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.21). More women assigned to the 2-hour arm had labors that crossed the action line (854/1,490 compared with 673/1,485; RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.18-1.37); received more intervention (772/1,490 compared with 624/1,485; RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14-1.33); and, if admitted to the midwife-led unit, were transferred for consultant-led care (366/674 compared with 285/666; RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.42).
CONCLUSION: In this birth setting, for primigravid women selecting low intervention care, the 2-hour partogram increases the need for intervention without improving maternal or neonatal outcomes, compared with the 4-hour partogram, advocated by the World Health Organization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/|/0/78346801.html, ISRCTN78346801.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16880298     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000226862.78768.5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Tanya Soomro; Esme V Menezes; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Physiologic partograph to improve birth safety and outcomes among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.538

3.  Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Nigel J Lee; Jeremy Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Sue V Kildea
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions.

Authors:  Fernando C Barros; Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta; Maneesh Batra; Thomas N Hansen; Cesar G Victora; Craig E Rubens
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies.

Authors:  Tina Lavender; Anna Cuthbert; Rebecca Md Smyth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 6.  Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term.

Authors:  Tina Lavender; Anna Hart; Rebecca M D Smyth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

7.  Evaluation of the alert line of partogram in recognizing the need for neonatal resuscitation.

Authors:  Nahid Bolbol-Haghighi; Maryam Keshavarz; Mehri Delvarianzadeh; Sahar Molzami
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

8.  Evaluation of paperless partogram as a bedside tool in the management of labor.

Authors:  Kiran Agarwal; Lata Agarwal; Vijender Kumar Agrawal; Ashok Agarwal; Mahender Sharma
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2013-01

9.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.