Literature DB >> 16879352

The Tabby cat locus maps to feline chromosome B1.

L A Lyons1, S J Bailey, K C Baysac, G Byrns, C A Erdman, N Fretwell, L Froenicke, K W Gazlay, L A Geary, J C Grahn, R A Grahn, G M Karere, M J Lipinski, H Rah, M T Ruhe, L H Bach.   

Abstract

The Tabby markings of the domestic cat are unique coat patterns for which no causative candidate gene has been inferred from other mammals. In this study, a genome scan was performed on a large pedigree of cats that segregated for Tabby coat markings, specifically for the Abyssinian (Ta-) and blotched (tbtb) phenotypes. There was linkage between the Tabby locus and eight markers on cat chromosome B1. The most significant linkage was between marker FCA700 and Tabby (Z = 7.56, theta = 0.03). Two additional markers in the region supported linkage, although not with significant LOD scores. Pairwise analysis of the markers supported the published genetic map of the cat, although additional meioses are required to refine the region. The linked markers cover a 17-cM region and flank an evolutionary breakpoint, suggesting that the Tabby gene has a homologue on either human chromosome 4 or 8. Alternatively, Tabby could be a unique locus in cats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16879352      PMCID: PMC1619149          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01458.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Genet        ISSN: 0268-9146            Impact factor:   3.169


Coat colour striping patterns, commonly known as Tabby markings, are frequent in domestic cats, but a candidate is not available from other species. Traditionally, three autosomal alleles have been suggested for Tabby: Abyssinian (T; a.k.a. ticked), mackerel (T; a.k.a. striped) and blotched (t; a.k.a. classic). Cats with traditional patterns resulting from Tabby alleles are presented in Fig. 1. The allelic series T > T > t has been suggested; however, this series is disputed because the Tabby coat patterns that form a distinctive spotted pattern cannot be explained with a single, allelic model. However, traditional patterns are represented by three alleles: T, which produces few markings and possible stripes on the head, legs and tail but not on the torso; T, which produces stripes on the head, legs, tail and torso; and t, which produces stripes on the head, legs and tail but circular patterns on the torso. Cats that are homozygous for the Abyssinian allele (TT) may have less barring on the legs and can be distinguished from heterozygotes. Hence, the T allele can be considered co-dominant to T and t when considering the leg barring, but this demarcation has variable expression and is difficult to distinguish.
Figure 1

Tabby patterns in the domestic shorthair cats: (a) Abysinnian, T-, (b) mackerel, TT or Tt, and (c) blotched, tt. The Abysinnian pattern is also known as ticked, the mackerel pattern as striped and the blotched pattern as classic. Homozygous TT individuals have the same pattern on the torso but may have less barring on the legs and tail. The Ttmackerel pattern may appear as the broken mackerel or spotted mackerel patterns; however, these phenotypes have not segregated in pedigrees, and the spotted pattern may be affected by modifiers.

Tabby patterns in the domestic shorthair cats: (a) Abysinnian, T-, (b) mackerel, TT or Tt, and (c) blotched, tt. The Abysinnian pattern is also known as ticked, the mackerel pattern as striped and the blotched pattern as classic. Homozygous TT individuals have the same pattern on the torso but may have less barring on the legs and tail. The Ttmackerel pattern may appear as the broken mackerel or spotted mackerel patterns; however, these phenotypes have not segregated in pedigrees, and the spotted pattern may be affected by modifiers. In the mouse, loss-of-function alleles for the sex-linked ectodysplasin-A (Eda) gene were originally described as ‘Tabby’, but this phenotype affects hair structure and is completely unrelated to the Tabby phenotypic patterns in cats (Ferguson ; Srivastava ). Therefore, a full-genome scan across the cat autosomes was performed to identify the locus for Tabby markings. An extended pedigree of 64 cats segregating for Tabby markings (Fig. 2) from the WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition (Melton Mowbray, Leics, UK) was used for linkage analysis. Three marking patterns were used to demarcate the Tabby phenotypes: Abyssinian, mackerel and blotched (Fig. 1; Lomax & Robinson 1988). Buccal cells were non-invasively obtained by swabbing the internal cheek of each cat with a cytological brush. DNA was extracted from buccal cells from the cats representing the pedigree as previously described (Oberbauer ).
Figure 2

Pedigree segregating for domestic cat Tabby patterns and linked markers from cat chromosome B1. Circles represent females, squares represent males, filled symbols indicate phenotypically Tabby Abyssinian cats, symbols with a center dot are Tabby blotched patterned cats and striped symbols indicate Tabby mackerel pattern cats. Unknown patterns are presented as open symbols. Unknown cats had solid, non-agouti colours, thus Tabby patterns could not be distinguished. Symbols with a diagonal slash represent cats that were not available for the analyses. Numbers under the symbols represent the laboratory sample numbers. Genotypes for the seven linked markers (FCA023, FCA809, FCA811, FCA812, FCA700, FCA254 and FCA813) are represented below the cat identification numbers respectively and are presented as haplotypes. No genotype data are represented by ‘0’. Cat H118 was duplicated to break an inbreeding loop and is also represented as B118. Cats that are recombinants between at least one marker in the haplotype and the Tabby phenotype are indicated with an ‘R’.

Pedigree segregating for domestic cat Tabby patterns and linked markers from cat chromosome B1. Circles represent females, squares represent males, filled symbols indicate phenotypically Tabby Abyssinian cats, symbols with a center dot are Tabby blotched patterned cats and striped symbols indicate Tabby mackerel pattern cats. Unknown patterns are presented as open symbols. Unknown cats had solid, non-agouti colours, thus Tabby patterns could not be distinguished. Symbols with a diagonal slash represent cats that were not available for the analyses. Numbers under the symbols represent the laboratory sample numbers. Genotypes for the seven linked markers (FCA023, FCA809, FCA811, FCA812, FCA700, FCA254 and FCA813) are represented below the cat identification numbers respectively and are presented as haplotypes. No genotype data are represented by ‘0’. Cat H118 was duplicated to break an inbreeding loop and is also represented as B118. Cats that are recombinants between at least one marker in the haplotype and the Tabby phenotype are indicated with an ‘R’. Approximately 150 feline-derived microsatellites were selected from the feline linkage (Menotti-Raymond , 2003) and radiation hybrid (RH) (Murphy ) maps to conduct a genome scan with an average marker spacing of 75 cR. Genotyping for the markers (Young ) and two-point linkage between the microsatellite genotypes and the Tabby phenotype (Lyons ) was conducted using the linkage software program (Lathrop ). Only torso patterns were considered for the phenotypic determination of Tabby Abyssinian to avoid problems when determining homozygotes and heterozygotes for this allele. To represent the dominant allelic series, the Tabby alleles were coded as binary factors for the linkage analysis: 111 representing T, 011 representing T and 001 representing the t allele. Frequencies of the phenotype and of the co-dominant marker alleles were estimated by directly counting unrelated parents in the pedigree. One individual (H118) was duplicated to remove an inbreeding loop. Pairwise analyses for markers on cat chromosome B1 and the Tabby phenotype are presented in Table 1. Linkage was suggested between eight markers on feline chromosome B1 and Tabby with LOD scores >3.0. Seven additional markers on cat chromosome B1 were genotyped to refine the linked region and the recombination map for this chromosome (Table 1). The most significant linkage was between marker FCA700 and Tabby (Z = 7.56, θ = 0.03). The small number of meioses in the pedigree restricts accurate multipoint mapping of the region; however, the Tabby locus likely resides between markers FCA559 and FCA254, which cover an estimated 113.6-cR region on the RH map of cat chromosome B1 and approximately 15.9 Mb or 17 cM on the linkage map (Menotti-Raymond ). The other 55 markers genotyped across the pedigree were not linked to Tabby (data not shown).
Table 1

LOD scores for pairwise comparisons between Tabby and chromosome B1 microsatellite markers.

MarkerFeline B1 position (cR)1HSA chromosome2Max LOD (Z)3Recombination rate (θ) at LOD (Z)
FCA577156.7No RHNS
FCA519248.781.420.191
FCA559416.983.170.099
FCA339566.18
FCA023597.1No RH5.380.038
FCA809608.785.340.081
FCA810618.1No RH0.480.000
FCA811630.2No RH3.690.048
FCA812648.1No RH3.760.053
FCA700663.047.560.030
FCA254679.7No RH5.090.106
FCA813701.2No RH3.680.05
FCA550731.8No RHNS
FCA814774.0No RHNS
FCA815783.6No RH
FCA513793.6No RH2.640.144
FCA816826.14NS

Radiation hybrid (RH) positions were previously published (Menotti-Raymond et al. 2003).

Human chromosome that has homologous sequence to the feline sequence. Markers without a chromosome position have not been assigned on the human radiation hybrid map (no RH).

NS, non-significant LOD score.

LOD scores for pairwise comparisons between Tabby and chromosome B1 microsatellite markers. Radiation hybrid (RH) positions were previously published (Menotti-Raymond et al. 2003). Human chromosome that has homologous sequence to the feline sequence. Markers without a chromosome position have not been assigned on the human radiation hybrid map (no RH). NS, non-significant LOD score. Positions (in cR) of the markers on cat chromosome B1 and the homologous sequences in humans are shown in Table 1. The comparative map between the cat and human indicates that a gene controlling the Tabby locus is on feline chromosome B1 near a breakpoint of evolutionarily conserved segments that are homologous to human chromosomes 4 and 8. Domestic cats have several tabby coat patterns, including Abyssinian, mackerel, broken mackerel, spotted and blotched. The analysed pedigree was limited primarily to the Abyssinian and blotched phenotypes. One mating between phenotypically Abyssinian and mackerel cats produced one cat of each phenotype and one mating between phenotypically blotched and mackerel cats produced two blotched and one mackerel cat. The segregation of these patterns is consistent with the hypothesis of a tri-allelic locus with a dominant series of alleles; however, the number of meioses from mackerel patterned cats was limited in our pedigree. Leg barring was not used to distinguish Abyssinian heterozygotes, and the mackerel patterns were not delineated between mackerel and broken mackerel in the analysis. Thus, controlled matings are required to clarify these classifications. In wild felids, such as lions and pumas, spotted Tabby patterns are evident in cubs but are lacking in the TabbyAbyssinian patterns of the adults. Along with the presentation of other coat pattern markings such as the spotted patterns and broken mackerel patterns, alternative hypotheses for the dominance of alleles and the presence of potential modifiers are still possible. The identified 17-cM region on cat chromosome B1 should be explored for candidate genes and causative mutations for feline Tabby patterns.
  10 in total

1.  Tabby pattern alleles of the domestic cat.

Authors:  T D Lomax; R Robinson
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Alternatives to blood as a source of DNA for large-scale scanning studies of canine genome linkages.

Authors:  A M Oberbauer; D I Grossman; M L Eggleston; D N Irion; A L Schaffer; N C Pedersen; J M Belanger
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  The Tabby phenotype is caused by mutation in a mouse homologue of the EDA gene that reveals novel mouse and human exons and encodes a protein (ectodysplasin-A) with collagenous domains.

Authors:  A K Srivastava; J Pispa; A J Hartung; Y Du; S Ezer; T Jenks; T Shimada; M Pekkanen; M L Mikkola; M S Ko; I Thesleff; J Kere; D Schlessinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tyrosinase mutations associated with Siamese and Burmese patterns in the domestic cat (Felis catus).

Authors:  L A Lyons; D L Imes; H C Rah; R A Grahn
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  A genetic linkage map of microsatellites in the domestic cat (Felis catus).

Authors:  M Menotti-Raymond; V A David; L A Lyons; A A Schäffer; J F Tomlin; M K Hutton; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  A radiation hybrid map of the cat genome: implications for comparative mapping.

Authors:  W J Murphy; S Sun; Z Chen; N Yuhki; D Hirschmann; M Menotti-Raymond; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Cloning of Tabby, the murine homolog of the human EDA gene: evidence for a membrane-associated protein with a short collagenous domain.

Authors:  B M Ferguson; N Brockdorff; E Formstone; T Ngyuen; J E Kronmiller; J Zonana
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Feline polycystic kidney disease is linked to the PKD1 region.

Authors:  Amy E Young; David S Biller; Eric J Herrgesell; Heather R Roberts; Leslie A Lyons
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans.

Authors:  G M Lathrop; J M Lalouel; C Julier; J Ott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Second-generation integrated genetic linkage/radiation hybrid maps of the domestic cat (Felis catus).

Authors:  M Menotti-Raymond; V A David; M E Roelke; Z Q Chen; K A Menotti; S Sun; A A Schäffer; J F Tomlin; R Agarwala; S J O'Brien; W J Murphy
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.645

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Periodic patterns in Rodentia: Development and evolution.

Authors:  Matthew R Johnson; Gregory S Barsh; Ricardo Mallarino
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 2.  Genetic testing in domestic cats.

Authors:  Leslie A Lyons
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Defining and mapping mammalian coat pattern genes: multiple genomic regions implicated in domestic cat stripes and spots.

Authors:  Eduardo Eizirik; Victor A David; Valerie Buckley-Beason; Melody E Roelke; Alejandro A Schäffer; Steven S Hannah; Kristina Narfström; Stephen J O'Brien; Marilyn Menotti-Raymond
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.