Literature DB >> 16877984

Synergistic sedation with oral midazolam as a premedication and intravenous propofol versus intravenous propofol alone in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in children: a prospective, randomized study.

Gregorios A Paspatis1, Ioanna Charoniti, Maria Manolaraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Nikolaos Papanikolaou, Almout Anastasiadou, Aliki Gritzali.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the present study was to compare the required dose of intravenous (IV) propofol between group A (synergistic sedation with an oral dose of midazolam combined with IV propofol) and group B (IV propofol alone), in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) in pediatric patients. The secondary objective was to compare the safety, the efficacy, the ease of IV line placement and the ease of separation from parents between the 2 groups.
METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive children (aged 3 y or older) who underwent UGIE were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 medication regimens. Patients in group A (n = 26, mean age: 8.1 y) received midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) orally. Thirty minutes after the midazolam dose was given, repeated IV doses of propofol 0.5 mg/kg were administered titrated to achieve the level of deep sedation. Patients in group B (n = 28, mean age: 9 y) received IV propofol alone with the same methodology and sedation end point.
RESULTS: The mean dose (1.8 +/- 0.7 mg/kg) of propofol administered in group A patients was remarkably lower compared with that (2.9 +/- 0.9 mg/kg) of group B. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that among sex, age, ASA grade and the type of sedation, the synergistic sedation was the only factor associated with the ease of IV line placement (chi(2) = 16.3, P < 0.001) and the ease of separation from parents (chi(2) = 41.6, P < 0.001). Additional multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that among sex, age, ASA grade and the type of sedation, synergistic sedation was the only factor associated with a higher level of patient comfort (chi(2) = 35.5, P < 0.001). The recovery time was significantly shorter in group B patients (7.7 +/- 3.6 min) compared with that of group A (25.9 +/- 4.1 minutes) (P < 0.01). The 2 regimens were equally safe.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that synergistic sedation with an oral dose of midazolam combined with propofol may benefit the children who undergo UGIE with regard to lower mean dose of propofol used, easier IV line placement, easier separation from the parents, less pain induced by the IV line placement and greater patient comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877984     DOI: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000228099.04702.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  15 in total

1.  Prospective description of coughing, hemodynamic changes, and oxygen desaturation during endoscopic sedation.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid El Chafic; George Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Oral Lorazepam is not Superior to Placebo for Lowering Stress in Children Before Digestive Endoscopy: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fella Chennou; Alexanne Bonneau-Fortin; Olivia Portolese; Lina Belmesk; Mélissa Jean-Pierre; Geneviève Côté; Martha H Dirks; Prévost Jantchou
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Remifentanil compared with midazolam and pethidine sedation during colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Maria M Manolaraki; Angeliki Theodoropoulou; Charalampos Stroumpos; Emmanouil Vardas; Pantelis Oustamanolakis; Aliki Gritzali; Gregorios Chlouverakis; Gregorios A Paspatis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Monitored anesthesia care with propofol versus surgeon-monitored sedation with benzodiazepines and narcotics for preoperative endoscopy in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; David S Tichansky; Johnathan Isom; Gayle Minard; Tiffany K Bee
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Propofol versus Midazolam for Sedation during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Children.

Authors:  Ji Eun Oh; Hae Jeong Lee; Young Hwan Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-07-31

6.  The benzodiazepine diazepam potentiates responses of α1β2γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors activated by either γ-aminobutyric acid or allosteric agonists.

Authors:  Ping Li; Megan M Eaton; Joe Henry Steinbach; Gustav Akk
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Harmony of Duet over Solo: Use of Midazolam or Propofol for Sedative Endoscopy in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Ko; Ki Baik Hahm
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-07-31

8.  Comparison between Midazolam Used Alone and in Combination with Propofol for Sedation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Yu Seok Kim; Myung-Hwan Kim; Seung Uk Jeong; Byung Uk Lee; Sang Soo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Dong-Wan Seo; Sung Koo Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-01-24

Review 9.  Procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Charu Mahajan; Hari Hara Dash
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2014-01

10.  A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ulas E Akbulut; Sedat Saylan; Bilal Sengu; Gulgun E Akcali; Engin Erturk; Murat Cakir
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.