Literature DB >> 16877897

Treatment benefits of duloxetine in major depressive disorder as assessed by number needed to treat.

John Cookson1, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Durisala Desaiah, Daniel K Kajdasz.   

Abstract

The efficacy of an antidepressant typically is assessed by comparing it with placebo using a validated rating scale. This type of analysis, however, does not translate well to the clinical settings. For clinicians, a more meaningful measure is the number needed to treat (NNT). The objective of this analysis is to assess the efficacy of duloxetine in terms of NNT. Data were obtained from nine clinical trials designed to assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine as a treatment for major depressive disorder. These studies examined 8-9 weeks of acute treatment with duloxetine. NNT estimates were determined for duloxetine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor comparators from six multi-dose studies, and for duloxetine in patients > or =65 years of age. The NNT was based on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD17) for response and remission, and improvements defined by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) were estimated and compared. The NNT was favorable for both duloxetine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor compared with placebo. The patients receiving duloxetine had NNT for HAMD17 response of 6.0, remission 7-9, and CGI-defined improvement 6-7 by 8 weeks. The NNTs for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine or paroxetine, 20 mg/day) were around 7 for response, 11 for remission, and 8 for CGI-defined improvement. The NNTs in the elderly were similar. The NNT for several measures of efficacy including remission consistently demonstrated the treatment benefits of duloxetine as well as of fluoxetine and paroxetine compared with placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877897     DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200609000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  3 in total

Review 1.  The general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Kylie Thaler; Richard A Hansen; Bradley N Gaynes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Kei Nagao; Taro Kishi; Masatsugu Moriwaki; Kiyoshi Fujita; Shigeki Hirano; Yoshio Yamanouchi; Toshihiko Funahashi; Nakao Iwata
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Targeting Uric Acid and the Inhibition of Progression to End-Stage Renal Disease--A Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Shunya Uchida; Wen Xiu Chang; Tatsuru Ota; Yoshifuru Tamura; Takeshi Shiraishi; Takanori Kumagai; Shigeru Shibata; Yoshihide Fujigaki; Makoto Hosoyamada; Kiyoko Kaneko; Zhong Yang Shen; Shin Fujimori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.