Literature DB >> 16877738

Residual disease monitoring in childhood acute myeloid leukemia by multiparameter flow cytometry: the MRD-AML-BFM Study Group.

Claudia Langebrake, Ursula Creutzig, Michael Dworzak, Ondrej Hrusak, Ester Mejstrikova, Frank Griesinger, Martin Zimmermann, Dirk Reinhardt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Monitoring of residual disease (RD) by flow cytometry in childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may predict outcome. However, the optimal time points for investigation, the best antibody combinations, and most importantly, the clinical impact of RD analysis remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred forty-two specimens of 150 children enrolled in the AML-Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (BFM) 98 study were analyzed by four-color immunophenotyping at up to four predefined time points during treatment. For each of the 12 leukemia-associated immunophenotypes and time points, a threshold level based on a previous retrospective analysis of another cohort of children with AML and on control bone marrows was determined.
RESULTS: Regarding all four time points, there is a statistically significant difference in the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) in those children presenting with immunologically detectable blasts at 3 or more time points. The levels at bone marrow puncture (BMP) 1 and BMP2 turned out to have the most significant predictive value for 3-year-EFS: 71% +/- 6% versus 48% +/- 9%, P(Log-Rank) = .029 and 70% +/- 6% versus 50% +/- 7%, P(Log-Rank) = .033), resulting in a more than two-fold risk of relapse. In a multivariate analysis, using a combined risk classification based on morphologically determined blasts at BMP1 and BMP2, French-American-British classification, and cytogenetics, the influence of immunologically determined RD was no longer statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: RD monitoring before second induction has the same predictive value as examining levels at four different time points during intensive chemotherapy. Compared with commonly defined risk factors in the AML-BFM studies, flow cytometry does not provide additional information for outcome prediction, but may be helpful to evaluate the remission status at day 28.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877738     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  37 in total

1.  Minimal residual disease-directed therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukaemia: results of the AML02 multicentre trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Hiroto Inaba; Gary Dahl; Raul C Ribeiro; W Paul Bowman; Jeffrey Taub; Stanley Pounds; Bassem I Razzouk; Norman J Lacayo; Xueyuan Cao; Soheil Meshinchi; Barbara Degar; Gladstone Airewele; Susana C Raimondi; Mihaela Onciu; Elaine Coustan-Smith; James R Downing; Wing Leung; Ching-Hon Pui; Dario Campana
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Residual disease detected by multidimensional flow cytometry signifies high relapse risk in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a report from Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Michael R Loken; Todd A Alonzo; Laura Pardo; Robert B Gerbing; Susana C Raimondi; Betsy A Hirsch; Phoenix A Ho; Janet Franklin; Todd M Cooper; Alan S Gamis; Soheil Meshinchi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Impact of pretransplantation minimal residual disease, as detected by multiparametric flow cytometry, on outcome of myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Ted A Gooley; Brent L Wood; Filippo Milano; Min Fang; Mohamed L Sorror; Elihu H Estey; Alexander I Salter; Emily Lansverk; Jason W Chien; Ajay K Gopal; Frederick R Appelbaum; John M Pagel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The prognostic significance of early treatment response in pediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of the international study Relapsed AML 2001/01.

Authors:  Ursula Creutzig; Martin Zimmermann; Michael N Dworzak; Brenda Gibson; Rienk Tamminga; Jonas Abrahamsson; Shau-Yin Ha; Henrik Hasle; Alexey Maschan; Yves Bertrand; Guy Leverger; Christine von Neuhoff; Bassem Razzouk; Carmelo Rizzari; Petr Smisek; Owen P Smith; Batia Stark; Dirk Reinhardt; Gertjan L Kaspers
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Multi-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping for detection of minimal residual disease in AML: past, present and future.

Authors:  J M Jaso; S A Wang; J L Jorgensen; P Lin
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Minimal Residual Disease in AML: Why Has It Lagged Behind Pediatric ALL?

Authors:  Elisabeth Paietta
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2015-06

7.  Universal monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Guangchun Song; Sheila Shurtleff; Allen Eng-Juh Yeoh; Wee Joo Chng; Siew Peng Chen; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing; Dario Campana
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-05-03

Review 8.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Alan S Gamis; Todd A Alonzo; John P Perentesis; Soheil Meshinchi
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 9.  Minimal residual disease quantitation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  David Shook; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Dario Campana
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma       Date:  2009

10.  Comparative analysis of different approaches to measure treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hiroto Inaba; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Xueyuan Cao; Stanley B Pounds; Sheila A Shurtleff; Kathleen Y Wang; Susana C Raimondi; Mihaela Onciu; Jeffrey Jacobsen; Raul C Ribeiro; Gary V Dahl; W Paul Bowman; Jeffrey W Taub; Barbara Degar; Wing Leung; James R Downing; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Dario Campana
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.