Literature DB >> 19778853

Minimal residual disease quantitation in acute myeloid leukemia.

David Shook1, Elaine Coustan-Smith, Raul C Ribeiro, Jeffrey E Rubnitz, Dario Campana.   

Abstract

The prognosis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is heterogeneous. A minority of patients have clinical and biologic features associated with a very high risk of relapse. For the remaining patients, no clear prognostic factors can be identified at diagnosis. The degree of treatment response is likely to be an informative predictor of outcome for these patients. Modern assays to detect AML cells that are undetectable by conventional morphologic techniques, ie, minimal residual disease (MRD), can potentially improve measurements of treatment response. It is plausible that modifications to treatment based on the results of these assays will improve clinical management and ultimately increase cure rates. Established MRD assays for AML are based on either polymerase chain reaction amplification of genetic abnormalities or flow cytometric detection of abnormal immunophenotypes. Residual disease and treatment response can be measured by these assays in a manner that is much more sensitive and objective than that afforded by conventional morphologic examination. The expanding use of MRD testing is beginning to change the definitions of treatment response and of remission. Other clinically informative uses of MRD testing include the detection of early relapse and the evaluation of the efficacy of new antileukemic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19778853      PMCID: PMC2785493          DOI: 10.3816/CLM.2009.s.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma        ISSN: 1557-9190


  50 in total

Review 1.  Detection of minimal residual disease in hematologic malignancies by real-time quantitative PCR: principles, approaches, and laboratory aspects.

Authors:  V H J van der Velden; A Hochhaus; G Cazzaniga; T Szczepanski; J Gabert; J J M van Dongen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Determination of minimal residual disease in leukaemia patients.

Authors:  Dario Campana
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Usefulness of quantitative assessment of the WT1 gene transcript as a marker for minimal residual disease detection.

Authors:  Daniela Cilloni; Enrico Gottardi; Milena Fava; Francesca Messa; Sonia Carturan; Alessandro Busca; Angelo Guerrasio; Giuseppe Saglio
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Development of a quantitative-PCR method for specific FLT3/ITD monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  C Beretta; G Gaipa; V Rossi; S Bernasconi; O Spinelli; M G Dell'Oro; C Rizzari; A Rambaldi; A Biondi; G Cazzaniga
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Studies of FLT3 mutations in paired presentation and relapse samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia: implications for the role of FLT3 mutations in leukemogenesis, minimal residual disease detection, and possible therapy with FLT3 inhibitors.

Authors:  Panagiotis D Kottaridis; Rosemary E Gale; Stephen E Langabeer; Marion E Frew; David T Bowen; David C Linch
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Standardization and quality control studies of 'real-time' quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia - a Europe Against Cancer program.

Authors:  J Gabert; E Beillard; V H J van der Velden; W Bi; D Grimwade; N Pallisgaard; G Barbany; G Cazzaniga; J M Cayuela; H Cavé; F Pane; J L E Aerts; D De Micheli; X Thirion; V Pradel; M González; S Viehmann; M Malec; G Saglio; J J M van Dongen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RQ-RT-PCR) in childhood acute myeloid leukemia with AML1/ETO rearrangement.

Authors:  S Viehmann; A Teigler-Schlegel; J Bruch; C Langebrake; D Reinhardt; J Harbott
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Clinical significance of residual disease during treatment in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Bassem I Razzouk; Ching-Hon Pui; Stanley Pounds; Martin Andreansky; Frederick G Behm; Susana C Raimondi; Sheila A Shurtleff; James R Downing; Dario Campana
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  The immunologic detection of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia.

Authors:  D Campana; E Coustan-Smith; G Janossy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  The use of receiver operating characteristic analysis for detection of minimal residual disease using five-color multiparameter flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia identifies patients with high risk of relapse.

Authors:  Adhra Al-Mawali; David Gillis; Ian Lewis
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.058

View more
  14 in total

1.  Impact of pretransplantation minimal residual disease, as detected by multiparametric flow cytometry, on outcome of myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Ted A Gooley; Brent L Wood; Filippo Milano; Min Fang; Mohamed L Sorror; Elihu H Estey; Alexander I Salter; Emily Lansverk; Jason W Chien; Ajay K Gopal; Frederick R Appelbaum; John M Pagel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Effects of dendritic cell-activated and cytokine-induced killer cell therapy on 22 children with acute myeloid leukemia after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yan Bai; Jin-E Zheng; Nan Wang; He-Hua Cai; Li-Na Zhai; Yao-Hui Wu; Fang Wang; Run-Ming Jin; Dong-Feng Zhou
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-22

3.  Prediction of early death after induction therapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with pretreatment risk scores: a novel paradigm for treatment assignment.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Megan Othus; Gautam Borthakur; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge E Cortes; Sherry A Pierce; Frederick R Appelbaum; Hagop A Kantarjian; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Minimal residual disease.

Authors:  D Campana
Journal:  Leuk Suppl       Date:  2012-08-09

5.  Superior mediastinal syndrome : a rare presenting feature of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Rachna Seth; Rishi Bolia; Richa Jain; Anita Chopra; Saroj Singh; Rajive Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Comparative analysis of different approaches to measure treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hiroto Inaba; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Xueyuan Cao; Stanley B Pounds; Sheila A Shurtleff; Kathleen Y Wang; Susana C Raimondi; Mihaela Onciu; Jeffrey Jacobsen; Raul C Ribeiro; Gary V Dahl; W Paul Bowman; Jeffrey W Taub; Barbara Degar; Wing Leung; James R Downing; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Dario Campana
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  How I treat pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Rubnitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Advances and issues in flow cytometric detection of immunophenotypic changes and genomic rearrangements in acute pediatric leukemia.

Authors:  Xin Maggie Wang
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2014-04

Review 9.  Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Treatment Challenges and Future Directions.

Authors:  Laura Finn; Andrew Dalovisio; James Foran
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

10.  Measurements of treatment response in childhood acute leukemia.

Authors:  Dario Campana; Elaine Coustan-Smith
Journal:  Korean J Hematol       Date:  2012-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.