Literature DB >> 16876990

A simple fluorescent method for detecting mismatched DNAs using a MutS-fluorophore conjugate.

Minseon Cho1, Suhman Chung, Seong-Dal Heo, Jakang Ku, Changill Ban.   

Abstract

A fluorescent method was developed for the detection of unpaired and mismatched DNAs using a MutS-fluorophore conjugate. The fluorophore, 2-(4'-(iodoacetoamido)anilino) naphthalene-6-sulfonic acid (IAANS), was site-specifically attached to the 469 position of Thermus aquaticus (Taq.) MutS mutant (C42A/T469C). The fluorophore labeled residue located at the dimer interface of the protein undergoes a drastic conformational change upon binding with mismatched DNA. The close proximity of the two identical fluorescent molecules presumably causes the self-quenching of the fluorophore, since fluorescence emission of the biosensor decreases with increasing concentrations of mismatched DNA. The order of binding affinity for each unpaired and mismatched DNA obtained by this method was DeltaT (Kd=52 nM)>GT (62 nM)>DeltaC (130 nM)>CT (160 nM)>DeltaG (170 nM)>DeltaA (250 nM)>CC (720 nM)>AT (950 nM). This order is comparable to the previous results of the gel mobility shift assay. Thus, this method can be a simple, useful tool for elucidating the mechanism of DNA mismatch repair as well as a novel probe for detecting of genetic mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16876990     DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  8 in total

1.  Large conformational changes in MutS during DNA scanning, mismatch recognition and repair signalling.

Authors:  Ruoyi Qiu; Vanessa C DeRocco; Credle Harris; Anushi Sharma; Manju M Hingorani; Dorothy A Erie; Keith R Weninger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Using FAM labeled DNA oligos to do RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assay.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Ya Gao; Xiaojue Peng; Guohua Yang; Feng Gao; Shaoqing Li; Yingguo Zhu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  A systematic comparison of error correction enzymes by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Nathan B Lubock; Di Zhang; Angus M Sidore; George M Church; Sriram Kosuri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Mismatch binding, ADP-ATP exchange and intramolecular signaling during mismatch repair.

Authors:  Manju M Hingorani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-12-02

5.  Slow conformational changes in MutS and DNA direct ordered transitions between mismatch search, recognition and signaling of DNA repair.

Authors:  Anushi Sharma; Christopher Doucette; F Noah Biro; Manju M Hingorani
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  MutS switches between two fundamentally distinct clamps during mismatch repair.

Authors:  Cherlhyun Jeong; Won-Ki Cho; Kyung-Mi Song; Christopher Cook; Tae-Young Yoon; Changill Ban; Richard Fishel; Jong-Bong Lee
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 15.369

7.  Dynamics of MutS-mismatched DNA complexes are predictive of their repair phenotypes.

Authors:  Vanessa C DeRocco; Lauryn E Sass; Ruoyi Qiu; Keith R Weninger; Dorothy A Erie
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Error removal in microchip-synthesized DNA using immobilized MutS.

Authors:  Wen Wan; Lulu Li; Qianqian Xu; Zhefan Wang; Yuan Yao; Rongliang Wang; Jia Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Xiaolian Gao; Jiong Hong
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.