Literature DB >> 16875843

Reducing inter-scanner variability of activation in a multicenter fMRI study: role of smoothness equalization.

Lee Friedman1, Gary H Glover, Diana Krenz, Vince Magnotta.   

Abstract

Scanner-to-scanner variability of activation in multicenter fMRI studies is often considered undesirable. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of a new procedure, "smoothness equalization", on reducing scanner differences in activation effect size as part of a multicenter fMRI project (FIRST BIRN). Five subjects were sent to 9 centers (10 scanners) and scanned on 2 consecutive days using a sensorimotor fMRI protocol. High-field (4 T and 3 T) and low-field (1.5 T) scanners from three vendors (GE, Siemens, and Picker) were included. The activation effect size of the scanners for the detection of neural activation during a sensorimotor task was evaluated as the percent of temporal variance accounted for by our model (percent of variance accounted for or PVAF). Marked scanner effects were noted for both PVAF as well as the degree of smoothness of the raw and processed images. After smoothness equalization, there was a dramatic (low field) or consistent (high-field) reduction in scanner-to-scanner variation of activation. It was shown that the likely basis of the scanner differences in smoothness was differences in k-space filtering algorithms. This work highlights the need to account for differences in smoothness when comparing scanners on activation effect size in multicenter fMRI studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875843     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  74 in total

1.  Effects of combining field strengths on auditory functional MRI group analysis: 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Kihwan Han; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Data-Driven Extraction of a Nested Model of Human Brain Function.

Authors:  Taylor Bolt; Jason S Nomi; B T Thomas Yeo; Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Function biomedical informatics research network recommendations for prospective multicenter functional MRI studies.

Authors:  Gary H Glover; Bryon A Mueller; Jessica A Turner; Theo G M van Erp; Thomas T Liu; Douglas N Greve; James T Voyvodic; Jerod Rasmussen; Gregory G Brown; David B Keator; Vince D Calhoun; Hyo Jong Lee; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon; Michele Diaz; Daniel S O'Leary; Syam Gadde; Adrian Preda; Kelvin O Lim; Cynthia G Wible; Hal S Stern; Aysenil Belger; Gregory McCarthy; Burak Ozyurt; Steven G Potkin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Test-retest and between-site reliability in a multicenter fMRI study.

Authors:  Lee Friedman; Hal Stern; Gregory G Brown; Daniel H Mathalon; Jessica Turner; Gary H Glover; Randy L Gollub; John Lauriello; Kelvin O Lim; Tyrone Cannon; Douglas N Greve; Henry Jeremy Bockholt; Aysenil Belger; Bryon Mueller; Michael J Doty; Jianchun He; William Wells; Padhraic Smyth; Steve Pieper; Seyoung Kim; Marek Kubicki; Mark Vangel; Steven G Potkin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice: look before you leap.

Authors:  Gregory G Brown
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Encoding, rehearsal, and recall in signers and speakers: shared network but differential engagement.

Authors:  D Bavelier; A J Newman; M Mukherjee; P Hauser; S Kemeny; A Braun; M Boutla
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  K-space spatial low-pass filters can increase signal loss artifacts in Echo-Planar Imaging.

Authors:  E C Caparelli; D Tomasi
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.880

8.  Integration of routine QA data into mega-analysis may improve quality and sensitivity of multisite diffusion tensor imaging studies.

Authors:  Peter Kochunov; Erin W Dickie; Joseph D Viviano; Jessica Turner; Peter B Kingsley; Neda Jahanshad; Paul M Thompson; Meghann C Ryan; Els Fieremans; Dmitry Novikov; Jelle Veraart; Elliot L Hong; Anil K Malhotra; Robert W Buchanan; Sofia Chavez; Aristotle N Voineskos
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Voxel-based morphometric multisite collaborative study on schizophrenia.

Authors:  Judith M Segall; Jessica A Turner; Theo G M van Erp; Tonya White; H Jeremy Bockholt; Randy L Gollub; Beng C Ho; Vince Magnotta; Rex E Jung; Robert W McCarley; S Charles Schulz; John Lauriello; Vince P Clark; James T Voyvodic; Michele T Diaz; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Tuning in to the voices: a multisite FMRI study of auditory hallucinations.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Brian J Roach; Kasper W Jorgensen; Jessica A Turner; Gregory G Brown; Randy Notestine; Amanda Bischoff-Grethe; Douglas Greve; Cynthia Wible; John Lauriello; Aysenil Belger; Bryon A Mueller; Vincent Calhoun; Adrian Preda; David Keator; Daniel S O'Leary; Kelvin O Lim; Gary Glover; Steven G Potkin; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.