INTRODUCTION: Auditory hallucinations or voices are experienced by 75% of people diagnosed with schizophrenia. We presumed that auditory cortex of schizophrenia patients who experience hallucinations is tonically "tuned" to internal auditory channels, at the cost of processing external sounds, both speech and nonspeech. Accordingly, we predicted that patients who hallucinate would show less auditory cortical activation to external acoustic stimuli than patients who did not. METHODS: At 9 Functional Imaging Biomedical Informatics Research Network (FBIRN) sites, whole-brain images from 106 patients and 111 healthy comparison subjects were collected while subjects performed an auditory target detection task. Data were processed with the FBIRN processing stream. A region of interest analysis extracted activation values from primary (BA41) and secondary auditory cortex (BA42), auditory association cortex (BA22), and middle temporal gyrus (BA21). Patients were sorted into hallucinators (n = 66) and nonhallucinators (n = 40) based on symptom ratings done during the previous week. RESULTS: Hallucinators had less activation to probe tones in left primary auditory cortex (BA41) than nonhallucinators. This effect was not seen on the right. DISCUSSION: Although "voices" are the anticipated sensory experience, it appears that even primary auditory cortex is "turned on" and "tuned in" to process internal acoustic information at the cost of processing external sounds. Although this study was not designed to probe cortical competition for auditory resources, we were able to take advantage of the data and find significant effects, perhaps because of the power afforded by such a large sample.
INTRODUCTION:Auditory hallucinations or voices are experienced by 75% of people diagnosed with schizophrenia. We presumed that auditory cortex of schizophreniapatients who experience hallucinations is tonically "tuned" to internal auditory channels, at the cost of processing external sounds, both speech and nonspeech. Accordingly, we predicted that patients who hallucinate would show less auditory cortical activation to external acoustic stimuli than patients who did not. METHODS: At 9 Functional Imaging Biomedical Informatics Research Network (FBIRN) sites, whole-brain images from 106 patients and 111 healthy comparison subjects were collected while subjects performed an auditory target detection task. Data were processed with the FBIRN processing stream. A region of interest analysis extracted activation values from primary (BA41) and secondary auditory cortex (BA42), auditory association cortex (BA22), and middle temporal gyrus (BA21). Patients were sorted into hallucinators (n = 66) and nonhallucinators (n = 40) based on symptom ratings done during the previous week. RESULTS:Hallucinators had less activation to probe tones in left primary auditory cortex (BA41) than nonhallucinators. This effect was not seen on the right. DISCUSSION: Although "voices" are the anticipated sensory experience, it appears that even primary auditory cortex is "turned on" and "tuned in" to process internal acoustic information at the cost of processing external sounds. Although this study was not designed to probe cortical competition for auditory resources, we were able to take advantage of the data and find significant effects, perhaps because of the power afforded by such a large sample.
Authors: D A Silbersweig; E Stern; C Frith; C Cahill; A Holmes; S Grootoonk; J Seaward; P McKenna; S E Chua; L Schnorr Journal: Nature Date: 1995-11-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Toshikazu Ikuta; Pamela DeRosse; Miklos Argyelan; Katherine H Karlsgodt; Peter B Kingsley; Philip R Szeszko; Anil K Malhotra Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Gary H Glover; Bryon A Mueller; Jessica A Turner; Theo G M van Erp; Thomas T Liu; Douglas N Greve; James T Voyvodic; Jerod Rasmussen; Gregory G Brown; David B Keator; Vince D Calhoun; Hyo Jong Lee; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon; Michele Diaz; Daniel S O'Leary; Syam Gadde; Adrian Preda; Kelvin O Lim; Cynthia G Wible; Hal S Stern; Aysenil Belger; Gregory McCarthy; Burak Ozyurt; Steven G Potkin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Judith M Ford; Thomas Dierks; Derek J Fisher; Christoph S Herrmann; Daniela Hubl; Jochen Kindler; Thomas Koenig; Daniel H Mathalon; Kevin M Spencer; Werner Strik; Remko van Lutterveld Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Christopher J Kroppmann; Daniel M Alschuler; Shiva Fekri; Roberto Gil; L Fredrik Jarskog; Jill M Harkavy-Friedman; Gerard E Bruder Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Dylan G Gee; Sarah C McEwen; Jennifer K Forsyth; Kristen M Haut; Carrie E Bearden; Jean Addington; Bradley Goodyear; Kristin S Cadenhead; Heline Mirzakhanian; Barbara A Cornblatt; Doreen Olvet; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Aysenil Belger; Larry J Seidman; Heidi Thermenos; Ming T Tsuang; Theo G M van Erp; Elaine F Walker; Stephan Hamann; Scott W Woods; Todd Constable; Tyrone D Cannon Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: David B Keator; Dingying Wei; Syam Gadde; Jeremy Bockholt; Jeffrey S Grethe; Daniel Marcus; Nicole Aucoin; Ibrahim B Ozyurt Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2009-09-07 Impact factor: 4.081