Literature DB >> 16874196

Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction by use of implants: an assessment of risk factors for complications and cancer control in 120 patients.

Leonie A E Woerdeman1, J Joris Hage, Mark J C Smeulders, Emiel J Th Rutgers, Chantal M A M van der Horst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction by use of an implant is increasingly accepted as a therapy for patients with breast cancer or a hereditary risk of breast cancer. Because little and contradictory evidence regarding possible risk factors for postoperative complications is available, the authors retrospectively assessed 13 such factors. They also evaluated the oncological safety of the procedure.
METHODS: From July of 1996 through June of 2000, 174 skin-sparing mastectomies were combined with immediate breast reconstruction in 120 patients. The authors assessed the influence of five patient-related and eight breast-related characteristics on the incidence of a complicated postoperative course by univariate and multivariate analyses. Oncological safety was evaluated by observed recurrent disease and 5-year survival.
RESULTS: Severe complications were observed in 17 patients of the 120 patients (14 percent), or 19 of the 174 breasts (11 percent). The patient-related characteristics of age and being operated on unilaterally significantly increased the risk of complications. Resident plastic surgeons and previous breast-conserving therapy including radiotherapy significantly increased the risk of implant loss. The local relapse rate among patients operated on for cancer was 0.02. The actuarial 5-year survival rate among patients who underwent curative mastectomies was 0.96.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction by use of an implant is oncologically safe, but the risk of postoperative complications cannot be neglected. The authors' observations may offer guidance for adapting indication and treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer or increased hereditary risk of such cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16874196     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000234049.91710.ba

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Anatomical Silicone-Based Implant and The Hammock Technique of Dermal-Muscle Flap in Large and Ptotic breasts: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Mohamed A Ellabban; Ahmed Nawar; Hala Milad; Mohammed G Ellabban
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surgical decision-making in immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kylie J Musgrave; Melissa Bochner; James Kollias
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The increasing use of prophylactic mastectomy in the prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Andrea Abbott; Amanda Arrington; Natasha Rueth
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  The investigation of the relation between expansion strategy and outcomes of two-stage expander-implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Min Ji Kim; Woo Beom Lee; Il Jae Lee; Hyung Min Hahn; Duy Quang Thai; Ji Young Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

5.  Trends and clinical implications of preoperative breast MRI in Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer.

Authors:  Brigid K Killelea; Jessica B Long; Anees B Chagpar; Xiaomei Ma; Pamela R Soulos; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The relationship of human acellular dermal matrix thickness on complication rate and patient-reported outcomes in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Seung Eun Hong; Jung-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

7.  Establishing a program for individuals at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Fernando Cadiz; Henry M Kuerer; Julio Puga; Jamile Camacho; Eduardo Cunill; Banu Arun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel De La Parra Marquez; Ricardo Fernandez-Riera; Hector Vela Cardona; Jesus María Rangel Flores
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Risk Factors for Complications after Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Felix J Paprottka; Christopher L Schlett; Rosalia Luketina; Karolin Paprottka; Dalius Klimas; Christine Radtke; Detlev Hebebrand
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  A Prospective Study of Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Laser-Assisted Indocyanine Green Angiography.

Authors:  Shayda J Mirhaidari; Gregory M Beddell; Marc V Orlando; Michael G Parker; John C Pedersen; Douglas S Wagner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.