Literature DB >> 16873295

Lack of concordance between the 75-g and 100-g glucose load tests for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Giorgio Mello1, Parretti Elena, Agostino Ognibene, Riccardo Cioni, Filippo Tondi, Paola Pezzati, Monica Pratesi, Gianfranco Scarselli, Gianni Messeri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is common and can have a substantial impact on fetal growth, birth weight, and morbidity. The American Diabetes Association recommends GDM testing with either a 3-h, 100-g glucose load (100 g) (criteria according to Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768-73) or a 2-h, 75-g glucose load (75g). We investigated the comparability of the 75 g and the 100g tests in the diagnosis of GDM.
METHODS: From January 1997 to December 1999, in 1061 consecutive Caucasian nonobese and nondiabetic pregnant women who attended the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, we performed GDM testing with a 75-g load during 2 periods of pregnancy: early (16-20 weeks) and late (26-30 weeks). Because we assumed there would be few GBM cases in women with a 1-h plasma glucose <1300 mg/L in the 75 g test, we did not retest these women. We retested the remaining women with possible or diagnosed GDM with a 100-g load within a week.
RESULTS: GDM was diagnosed in 41 of 227 women with the 100-g load and 15 of 227 with the 75-g load (11 concordant); the kappa index was 0.21. At 26-31 weeks of pregnancy, 484 of 976 women (49.9%) underwent both tests. GDM was diagnosed in 60 of 484 woman with the 100-g load and in 26 of 484 with the 75-g load (13 concordant); the kappa index was 0.18.
CONCLUSIONS: Among women with possible GDM in both early and late periods of pregnancy, there was only weak diagnostic agreement between results determined with 75-g and 100-g glucose loads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16873295     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.058040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

1.  Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity for Women Who Would Be Added to the Diagnosis of GDM Using IADPSG Criteria: A Secondary Analysis of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study.

Authors:  Thaddeus P Waters; Alan R Dyer; Denise M Scholtens; Sharon L Dooley; Elaine Herer; Lynn P Lowe; Jeremy J N Oats; Bengt Persson; David A Sacks; Boyd E Metzger; Patrick M Catalano
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: The influence of changing diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Eoin Noctor; Fidelma P Dunne
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Predictive Characteristics of Elevated 1-Hour Glucose Challenge Test Results for Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Margaret Harper; George R Saade; Steve N Caritis; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Relationship between carbohydrate intake and oral glucose tolerance test results among pregnant women.

Authors:  Emily A Rosenberg; Ellen W Seely; Kaitlyn James; Juliana Arenas; Michael J Callahan; Melody Cayford; Stacey Nelson; Sarah N Bernstein; Ravi Thadhani; Camille E Powe
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 8.180

5.  Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria.

Authors:  Esa M Davis; Christina M Scifres; Kaleab Abebe; Tina Costacou; Diane Comer; Patrick Catalano; Hyagriv Simhan; Matthew Freiberg; Nancy Day
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-10-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.