Literature DB >> 16873112

Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity.

Barbara J Juhasz1, Simon P Liversedge, Sarah J White, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

This experiment investigated whether properties of the text being read affect binocular coordination of the eyes during reading. Readers' binocular eye movements were recorded while they read sentences that contained high- and low-frequency words. In addition, half of the sentences were presented in normal case, and half were presented in alternating case (i.e., AlTeRnAtInG cAsE). Past research has suggested that the visual system tolerates less binocular fixation disparity with alternating than with normal case (Heller & Radach, 1999). While both word frequency and alternating case produced large effects on fixation durations on the target word, neither manipulation affected the magnitude of fixation disparity. It is concluded that linguistic and visual properties of the text being read do not influence binocular coordination of the eyes during reading. Additional analyses also showed no difference in fixation disparity between reading and a nonlinguistic task. Implications of these results for split-fovea models of reading are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16873112     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500497722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  16 in total

1.  Effects of word frequency and modality on sentence comprehension impairments in people with aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

3.  The effect of the frequencies of three consecutive content words on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

4.  Eye position changes during reading fixations are spatially selective.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Matthew S Solomon; Bradley A Seymour; Ralph Radach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Jamie Reilly; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

6.  Novel names extend for how long preschool children sample visual information.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Catarina Vales; Caitlin M Fausey; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-12-26

7.  Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Reading text increases binocular disparity in dyslexic children.

Authors:  Julie A Kirkby; Hazel I Blythe; Denis Drieghe; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Binocular coordination: reading stereoscopic sentences in depth.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Hazel I Blythe; Julie A Kirkby; Keith Rayner; Nicolas S Holliman; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Eye movements reveal effects of visual content on eye guidance and lexical access during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.