Literature DB >> 16873061

Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis.

Emmanuelle Martini1, Robert L Diaz, Neil Hunter, Scott Keeney.   

Abstract

Crossovers produced by homologous recombination promote accurate chromosome segregation in meiosis and are controlled such that at least one forms per chromosome pair and multiple crossovers are widely spaced. Recombination initiates with an excess number of double-strand breaks made by Spo11 protein. Thus, crossover control involves a decision by which some breaks give crossovers while others follow a predominantly noncrossover pathway(s). To understand this decision, we examined recombination when breaks are reduced in yeast spo11 hypomorphs. We find that crossover levels tend to be maintained at the expense of noncrossovers and that genomic loci differ in expression of this "crossover homeostasis." These findings define a previously unsuspected manifestation of crossover control, i.e., that the crossover/noncrossover ratio can change to maintain crossovers. Our results distinguish between existing models of crossover control and support the hypothesis that an obligate crossover is a genetically programmed event tied to crossover interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16873061      PMCID: PMC1949389          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  35 in total

1.  Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation.

Authors:  V Borde; A S Goldman; M Lichten
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  N Hunter; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet.

Authors:  Scott L Page; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes.

Authors:  Jennifer C Fung; Beth Rockmill; Michael Odell; G Shirleen Roeder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Identification of residues in yeast Spo11p critical for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation.

Authors:  Robert L Diaz; Alston D Alcid; James M Berger; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Modeling interference in genetic recombination.

Authors:  M S McPeek; T P Speed
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance.

Authors:  E Foss; R Lande; F W Stahl; C M Steinberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The control of chiasma distribution.

Authors:  G H Jones
Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol       Date:  1984

9.  Recombination nodules in the oocytes of the chicken, Gallus domesticus.

Authors:  M I Rahn; A J Solari
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1986

10.  The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination.

Authors:  Peter B Moens; Nadine K Kolas; Madalena Tarsounas; Edyta Marcon; Paula E Cohen; Barbara Spyropoulos
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  176 in total

1.  Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number.

Authors:  Simona Rosu; Diana E Libuda; Anne M Villeneuve
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Pch2 modulates chromatid partner choice during meiotic double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sarah Zanders; Megan Sonntag Brown; Cheng Chen; Eric Alani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Altered distribution of MLH1 foci is associated with changes in cohesins and chromosome axis compaction in an asynaptic mutant of tomato.

Authors:  Huanyu Qiao; Hildo H Offenberg; Lorinda K Anderson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Distinct roles of Mus81, Yen1, Slx1-Slx4, and Rad1 nucleases in the repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister chromatid exchange.

Authors:  Sandra Muñoz-Galván; Cristina Tous; Miguel G Blanco; Erin K Schwartz; Kirk T Ehmsen; Stephen C West; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Loss of DNA methylation affects the recombination landscape in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Marie Mirouze; Michal Lieberman-Lazarovich; Riccardo Aversano; Etienne Bucher; Joël Nicolet; Jon Reinders; Jerzy Paszkowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Robustness in crossover regulation during meiosis.

Authors:  Chitra V Kotwaliwale
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 7.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  Recombination patterns in maize reveal limits to crossover homeostasis.

Authors:  Gaganpreet K Sidhu; Celestia Fang; Mischa A Olson; Matthieu Falque; Olivier C Martin; Wojciech P Pawlowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Meiotic recombination-related DNA synthesis and its implications for cross-over and non-cross-over recombinant formation.

Authors:  Masahiro Terasawa; Hideyuki Ogawa; Yasumasa Tsukamoto; Miki Shinohara; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Nancy Kleckner; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work.

Authors:  Audrey Lynn; Rachel Soucek; G Valentin Börner
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.