Literature DB >> 16872787

Tailored interventions for screening mammography among a sample of initially non-adherent women: when is a booster dose important?

Celette Sugg Skinner1, Sarah C Kobrin, Patrick O Monahan, Joanne Daggy, Usha Menon, Helen Smith Todora, Victoria L Champion.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess added value of a booster dose of a tailored mammography intervention.
METHODS: Participants, non-adherent at baseline, were randomly assigned to usual care or one of three tailored interventions. Intervention group members (n=657) were further randomly assigned to receive/not receive a booster intervention dose. Electronic record mammography data were collected following initial intervention and at 6 and 15 months post-booster.
RESULTS: Booster had no effect among women not screened after first intervention dose (n=337). Among women screened after initial dose (n=320), booster predicted re-screening at 6 but not 15 months. A boosterxrace interaction showed a booster effect at 6 months for African Americans (OR=4.66, p=.0005) but not Caucasians (OR=0.74, p=.44).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest if a first-dose intervention does not facilitate screening, neither will a booster dose. However, among women for whom a first dose is effective, boosters can facilitate timely repeat adherence, especially among African Americans. At 6 months booster recipients were less likely to be off-schedule but, by 15 months, the groups were similar. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Boosters may effect when, but not whether, women continue screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16872787     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Screening initiation with FIT or colonoscopy: Post-hoc analysis of a pragmatic, randomized trial.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Chul Ahn; Sandi L Pruitt; Amy E Hughes; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta; Noel O Santini; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Amit G Singal; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Basic needs, stress and the effects of tailored health communication in vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Erika R Cappelletti; Matthew W Kreuter; Sonia Boyum; Tess Thompson
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 4.  Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Marc D Schwartz; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2013-05

5.  A stepped randomized trial to promote colorectal cancer screening in a nationwide sample of U.S. Veterans.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Deborah J Del Junco; Sharon P Coan; Caitlin C Murphy; Scott T Walters; Robert H Friedman; Lori A Bastian; Deborah A Fisher; David R Lairson; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.261

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.