Literature DB >> 16870769

Dose separation does not overcome the pharmacokinetic interaction between fosamprenavir and lopinavir/ritonavir.

Amanda H Corbett1, Kristine B Patterson, Hsiao-Chuan Tien, Leslie A Kalvass, Joseph J Eron, Linh T Ngo, Michael L Lim, Angela D M Kashuba.   

Abstract

Previous investigations have shown a significant negative two-way drug interaction between fosamprenavir (FPV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients and seronegative volunteers. This randomized, nonblinded, three-way crossover study of HIV-seronegative adult volunteers investigated dose separation and increased doses of RTV as a means to overcome the interaction between FPV and LPV/RTV. Eleven HIV-seronegative volunteers were given FPV plus LPV/RTV at 700 mg plus 400/100 mg every 12 hours (q12h) simultaneously for 10 days and then randomized to receive each of three 7-day treatments in one of six possible sequences, as follows: FPV plus LPV/RTV at 700 mg plus 400 mg/100 mg q12h simultaneously, FPV/RTV at 700 mg/100 mg q12h plus LPV/RTV at 400 mg/100 mg q12h, with doses separated by 4 h, and FPV/RTV at 1,400 mg/200 mg in the morning plus LPV/RTV at 800 mg/200 mg in the evening. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on day 8 of each treatment, and samples were analyzed for FPV, amprenavir (APV), LPV, and RTV concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMR [with 95% confidence intervals]) for the 4- and 12-h dose separation strategies compared to simultaneous administration were calculated for the areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 24 h. Compared to simultaneous administration, RTV exposures increased with both 4-h and 12-h dose separation strategies (GMR, 5.30 [3.66 to 7.67] and 4.45 [3.09 to 6.41], respectively). LPV exposures also significantly increased with both 4-h and 12-h dose separation strategies (GMR, 1.76 [1.34 to 2.32] and 1.43 [1.02 to 2.01], respectively). However, both the 4- and 12-h strategies resulted in greater reductions in APV exposure (0.67 [0.54 to 0.83] and 0.77 [0.59 to 0.99], respectively) compared to simultaneous administration. Additional investigations are warranted to determine the optimal dosing of FPV with LPV/RTV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16870769      PMCID: PMC1538690          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01006-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  18 in total

1.  Effect of Maalox on the bioavailability of oral gemifloxacin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Allen; M Vousden; A Porter; A Lewis
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.544

2.  Evaluation of the influence of antacids and H2 antagonists on the absorption of moxifloxacin after oral administration of a 400mg dose to healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H Stass; M F Böttcher; K Ochmann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Transporters and drug therapy: implications for drug disposition and disease.

Authors:  Richard H Ho; Richard B Kim
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Effect of simultaneous versus staggered dosing on pharmacokinetic interactions of protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Carla B Washington; Charles Flexner; Lewis B Sheiner; Susan L Rosenkranz; Yoninah Segal; Judith A Aberg; Terrence F Blaschke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  Induction of drug metabolism: the role of nuclear receptors.

Authors:  Christoph Handschin; Urs A Meyer
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir in salvage therapy; pharmacokinetics, tolerability and efficacy.

Authors:  Charles J L la Porte; Jan-Christian Wasmuth; Katrin Schneider; Jürgen K Rockstroh; David M Burger
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  Dual vs single protease inhibitor therapy following antiretroviral treatment failure: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Scott M Hammer; Florin Vaida; Kara K Bennett; Mary K Holohan; Lewis Sheiner; Joseph J Eron; Lawrence Joseph Wheat; Ronald T Mitsuyasu; Roy M Gulick; Fred T Valentine; Judith A Aberg; Michael D Rogers; Cheryl N Karol; Alfred J Saah; Ronald H Lewis; Laura J Bessen; Carol Brosgart; Victor DeGruttola; John W Mellors
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Pharmacokinetic interaction between amprenavir and delavirdine: evidence of induced clearance by amprenavir.

Authors:  Jonathan Q Tran; Carolyn Petersen; May Garrett; Brian Hee; Bradley M Kerr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Protein binding in antiretroviral therapies.

Authors:  Marta Boffito; David J Back; Terrence F Blaschke; Malcolm Rowland; Richard J Bertz; John G Gerber; Veronica Miller
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.205

10.  In vitro antiviral interaction of lopinavir with other protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Akhteruzzaman Molla; Hongmei Mo; Sudthida Vasavanonda; Lixin Han; C Thomas Lin; Ann Hsu; Dale J Kempf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Double-boosted protease inhibitor antiretroviral regimens: what role?

Authors:  Esteban Ribera; Adrian Curran
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of the HIV integrase inhibitor elvitegravir.

Authors:  Srinivasan Ramanathan; Anita A Mathias; Polina German; Brian P Kearney
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Brief Report: Significant Decreases in Both Total and Unbound Lopinavir and Amprenavir Exposures During Coadministration: ACTG Protocol A5143/A5147s Results.

Authors:  Julie B Dumond; Joseph Rigdon; Katie Mollan; Camlin Tierney; Angela D M Kashuba; Francesca Aweeka; Ann C Collier
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Antiretroviral drug interactions: overview of interactions involving new and investigational agents and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring for management.

Authors:  R Chris Rathbun; Michelle D Liedtke
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 6.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.