Literature DB >> 12095381

Dual vs single protease inhibitor therapy following antiretroviral treatment failure: a randomized trial.

Scott M Hammer1, Florin Vaida, Kara K Bennett, Mary K Holohan, Lewis Sheiner, Joseph J Eron, Lawrence Joseph Wheat, Ronald T Mitsuyasu, Roy M Gulick, Fred T Valentine, Judith A Aberg, Michael D Rogers, Cheryl N Karol, Alfred J Saah, Ronald H Lewis, Laura J Bessen, Carol Brosgart, Victor DeGruttola, John W Mellors.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Management of antiretroviral treatment failure in patients receiving protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimens is a therapeutic challenge.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether adding a second PI improves antiviral efficacy of a 4-drug combination in patients with virologic failure while taking a PI-containing regimen.
DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, 4-arm trial, double-blind and placebo-controlled for second PI, conducted between October 1998 and April 2000, for which there was a 24-week primary analysis with extension to 48 weeks.
SETTING: Thirty-one participating AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) Clinical Trials Units in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 481 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons with prior exposure to a maximum of 3 PIs and viral load above 1000 copies/mL. INTERVENTION: Selectively randomized assignment (per prior PI exposure) to saquinavir (n = 116); indinavir (n = 69); nelfinavir (n = 139); or placebo twice per day (n = 157); in combination with amprenavir, abacavir, efavirenz, and adefovir dipivoxil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy analysis involved the proportion with viral load below 200 copies/mL at 24 weeks. Other measures were changes in viral load and CD4 cell count from baseline, adverse events, and HIV drug susceptibility.
RESULTS: Of 481 patients, 148 (31%) had a viral load below 200 copies/mL at week 24. The proportions of patients with a viral load below 200 copies/mL in the saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, and placebo arms were 34% (40/116), 36% (25/69), 34% (47/139), and 23% (36/157), respectively. The proportion in the combined dual-PI arms was higher than in the amprenavir-plus-placebo arm (35% [112/324] vs 23% [36/157], respectively; P =.002). Overall, a higher proportion of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive patients had a viral load below 200 copies/mL compared with NNRTI-experienced patients (43% [115/270] vs 16% [33/211], respectively; P<.001). Baseline HIV-1 hypersusceptibility to efavirenz (< or = 0.4-fold difference in susceptibility compared with reference virus) was associated with suppression of viral load at 24 weeks to below 200 copies/mL (odds ratio [OR], 3.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-7.33; P =.001), and more than 10-fold reduction in efavirenz susceptibility, with less likelihood of suppression at 24 weeks (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.87; P =.03).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of antiretroviral-experienced patients with advanced immunodeficiency, viral load suppression to below 200 copies/mL was achieved in 31% of patients with regimens containing 4 or 5 new drugs. Use of 2 PIs, being naive to NNRTIs, and baseline hypersusceptibility to efavirenz were associated with a favorable outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12095381     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.2.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  37 in total

1.  Outcomes of patients on dual-boosted PI regimens: experience of the Swiss HIV cohort study.

Authors:  Regina B Osih; Patrick Taffé; Martin Rickenbach; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Luigia Elzi; Christoph Fux; Milos Opravil; Enos Bernasconi; Patrick Schmid; Huldrych F Günthard; Matthias Cavassini
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.205

2.  Bayesian Experimental Design for Long-Term Longitudinal HIV Dynamic Studies.

Authors:  Yangxin Huang; Hulin Wu
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 1.111

3.  Antiretroviral therapy for adults infected with HIV: Guidelines for health care professionals from the Quebec HIV care committee.

Authors:  Danielle Rouleau; Claude Fortin; Benoît Trottier; Richard Lalonde; Normand Lapointe; Pierre Côté; Jean-Pierre Routy; Marie-France Matte; Irina Tsarevsky; Jean-Guy Baril
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Testing for associations with missing high-dimensional categorical covariates.

Authors:  Jennifer Schumi; A Gregory DiRienzo; Victor DeGruttola
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Buckley-James boosting for survival analysis with high-dimensional biomarker data.

Authors:  Zhu Wang; C Y Wang
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-08

Review 6.  ["State of the HAART". Current strategies for antiretroviral therapy].

Authors:  S Staszewski; C Stephan
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  Lower CD4 cell count and higher virus load, but not antiretroviral drug resistance, are associated with AIDS-defining events and mortality: an ACTG Longitudinal Linked Randomized Trials (ALLRT) analysis.

Authors:  Susan Swindells; Hongyu Jiang; A Lisa Mukherjee; Mark Winters; Ronald J Bosch; David Katzenstein
Journal:  HIV Clin Trials       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

8.  Virologic efficacy of boosted double versus boosted single protease inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Yue Wang; Mark J van der Laan; Soo-Yon Rhee; Robert W Shafer; W Jeffrey Fessel
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.177

9.  Docking and multivariate methods to explore HIV-1 drug-resistance: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Anna Maria Almerico; Marco Tutone; Antonino Lauria
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Flexible regression model selection for survival probabilities: with application to AIDS.

Authors:  A Gregory DiRienzo
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.