Literature DB >> 16870357

Imitation of cigarette smoking: an experimental study on smoking in a naturalistic setting.

Zeena Harakeh1, Rutger C M E Engels, Rick B Van Baaren, Ron H J Scholte.   

Abstract

AIMS: Examine whether smokers imitate smoking behaviour of strangers and to what extent this is moderated by the nature of social interactions. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: An experiment with a three (heavy smoking, light smoking, or no smoking condition) by two (warm versus cold social interaction condition) factorial design. Daily smoking young adults were exposed to same-gender confederates and were observed in a bar laboratory. MEASUREMENTS: Smoking and social behaviour were observed and coded during a 30-min break between two tasks, consisting of rating television advertisements.
FINDINGS: Participants imitated the smoking behaviour of confederates. After controlling for young people's craving, confederate's smoking explains 35% of the variance in the number of cigarettes smoked. Participants are more likely to smoke and to continue smoking in the warm social interaction condition. Lighting up the first cigarette was affected by confederate's smoking and participant's urges to smoke. Lighting up a second was affected by the heavy smoking condition and warm social interaction condition. Lighting up a third cigarette was affected only by the heavy smoking condition.
CONCLUSION: Imitation largely explains why individuals light up a cigarette and continue to smoke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16870357     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  10 in total

1.  Behavioral Economics of Cigarette Purchase Tasks: Within-Subject Comparison of Real, Potentially Real, and Hypothetical Cigarettes.

Authors:  A George Wilson; Christopher T Franck; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Exposure to movie smoking, antismoking ads and smoking intensity: an experimental study with a factorial design.

Authors:  Zeena Harakeh; Rutger C M E Engels; Kathleen Vohs; Rick B van Baaren; James Sargent
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  The effects of social contact on cocaine intake under extended-access conditions in male rats.

Authors:  Andrea M Robinson; Ryan T Lacy; Justin C Strickland; Charlotte P Magee; Mark A Smith
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  Reinforcing effects of stimulants in humans: sensitivity of progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  William W Stoops
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 5.  The case for investigating social context in laboratory studies of smoking.

Authors:  John D Dimoff; Michael A Sayette
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Determinants of obesity: results from a longitudinal study of adolescents and adults living in an urban area.

Authors:  Judith S Brook; Jung Yeon Lee; David W Brook; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2013-12

7.  Parents' and peers' normative influence on adolescents' smoking: results from a Swiss-Italian sample of middle schools students.

Authors:  Francesca Scalici; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2017-01-21

8.  Imitating the Risky Decision-Making of Peers: An Experimental Study Among Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Larisa Riedijk; Zeena Harakeh
Journal:  Emerg Adulthood       Date:  2017-08-23

9.  Cigarette craving and withdrawal symptoms during temporary abstinence and the effect of nicotine gum.

Authors:  Jamie Brown; Peter Hajek; Hayden McRobbie; Jo Locker; Fiona Gillison; Andy McEwen; Emma Beard; Robert West
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Self-categorization as a basis of behavioural mimicry: Experiments in The Hive.

Authors:  Fergus G Neville; John Drury; Stephen D Reicher; Sanjeedah Choudhury; Clifford Stott; Roger Ball; Daniel C Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.