Literature DB >> 16870218

Feasibility and benefits of implementing a Slimming on Referral service in primary care using a commercial weight management partner.

J H Lavin1, A Avery, S M Whitehead, E Rees, J Parsons, T Bagnall, J H Barth, C H S Ruxton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess participation in a costed Slimming on Referral service and identify factors associated with success. STUDY
DESIGN: Simple intervention offering participation in a new service to 100 eligible patients. The setting was two Derby general practices, one inner city and one suburban. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seven patients (mean age 50 years) attending general practice for non-obesity reasons. INCLUSION CRITERIA: BMI > or = 30, age > or = 18 years, not pregnant, no recent commercial weight management group membership, willingness to attempt weight loss.
METHODS: Patients were offered free attendance at a local Slimming World group for 12 consecutive weeks. Body weight and height were measured at baseline, and questionnaires established perceived health, motivation to lose weight, employment, concerns, responsibilities and well-being. Weight was measured at each group visit. The main outcome measures were: (1) changes in body weight at 12 and 24 weeks, (2) social and demographic factors associated with barriers to enrolment, continued attendance and successful weight loss.
RESULTS: Ninety-one (85%) patients attended a group, with 62 completing 12 weeks. Average weight loss in participants was 5.4 kg (6.4% baseline weight). Forty-seven then chose to self-fund, with 34 (37% original group) completing a further 12 weeks. Average weight loss over the total 24 weeks was 11.1 kg (11.3% baseline weight). Regular attendance was affected by income, financial concerns (independent of actual income), age, perceived importance of weight loss and initial weight loss success. Well-being of patients significantly improved between baseline and both 12 and 24 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration with an appropriate commercial weight management organization offers a feasible weight management option that is either similar to, or better than, other options in terms of attrition, efficacy and cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16870218     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  20 in total

Review 1.  Linkages between clinical practices and community organizations for prevention: a literature review and environmental scan.

Authors:  Deborah S Porterfield; Laurie W Hinnant; Heather Kane; Joseph Horne; Kelly McAleer; Amy Roussel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Aidan Q Innes; Greig Thomson; Mary Cotter; James A King; Niels B J Vollaard; Benjamin M Kelly
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Community-Clinical Linkages With Community Health Workers in the United States: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Abby M Lohr; Maia Ingram; Annabelle V Nuñez; Kerstin M Reinschmidt; Scott C Carvajal
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2018-01-24

4.  Obesity in primary care: evidence for advising weight constancy rather than weight loss in unsuccessful dieters.

Authors:  Rachel Pryke; Andrea Docherty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  A randomised controlled trial to compare a range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with a minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: the Lighten Up trial.

Authors:  Kate Jolly; Amanda Daley; Peymane Adab; Amanda Lewis; John Denley; Jane Beach; Paul Aveyard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Weight Watchers on prescription: an observational study of weight change among adults referred to Weight Watchers by the NHS.

Authors:  Amy L Ahern; Ashley D Olson; Louise M Aston; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Comparison of range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: lighten Up randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kate Jolly; Amanda Lewis; Jane Beach; John Denley; Peymane Adab; Jonathan J Deeks; Amanda Daley; Paul Aveyard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-03

8.  Cost effectiveness of primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment, relative to standard care: a modelled lifetime analysis.

Authors:  N R Fuller; H Carter; D Schofield; H Hauner; S A Jebb; S Colagiuri; I D Caterson
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Service evaluation of weight outcomes as a function of initial BMI in 34,271 adults referred to a primary care/commercial weight management partnership scheme.

Authors:  Richard James Stubbs; David Johnathan Brogelli; Jenny Barber; Carolyn Pallister; Stephen Whybrow; Amanda Avery; Jacquie Lavin
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-04-24

10.  A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment, relative to standard care--an international randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  N R Fuller; S Colagiuri; D Schofield; A D Olson; R Shrestha; C Holzapfel; S B Wolfenstetter; R Holle; A L Ahern; H Hauner; S A Jebb; I D Caterson
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.